Pointless argument about chance and randomness

"
Deccode wrote:

I'm sure now you are retarded.
The first picture shows randomness.
All chances of all outcomes must be the same.
The chances are not shown in the first picture it's just 3 of different possible outcomes.


Wrong. You shouldn't be so quick with the insults. The chances ARE shown in the picure. It's 0.2, 0.5 and 0.3.

Compare it to the second picture and you will hopefully understand.

"
Deccode wrote:

Next:
Non-equal chances doesn't make it predictable? Even equal chances doesn't make it predictable you low minded freak. You cannot predict randomness. Are you seriously questioning this?

Obviously equal chances doesn't make it predictable... If you think I question whether or not you can predict randomness then you better damn learn how to read properly.

"
Deccode wrote:

I'm saying that you have no idea what you are talking about. You manipulate something, you say it's still random? Then you are dumb. Easy as that. I honestly can't tell you this easier.


You don't take in anything I say to you, and you can't even understand a simple picture, yet you call me dumb?
No, you are the clueless idiot here.
"
linkstatic wrote:
Everyone shut up.

Randomness does NOT mean everything has to have an equal chance for it to occur. Just the fact that the outcome is unpredictable is random by definition.


Yes. Now lets hope that Deccode finally lets that sink in.
Edited
Sure bro and manipulated things are random.
Last edited by Deccode#6112 on Feb 14, 2013, 2:16:58 AM
"
Deccode wrote:
Edited
Sure bro and manipulated things are random.


wow, you must really be the most ignorant person on these forums.
"
Sickness wrote:
"
Deccode wrote:
Edited
Sure bro and manipulated things are random.


wow, you must really be the most ignorant person on these forums.

Ignorant? You are stubborn beyond cure. Your stupidity hurts me.
randomness favoring less links ?
ROFL
( its like in league of legends "I'm a good players but the matchmaking always puts me with noobs, so it's not my fault ).

By the way decode, if you want another subject to continue saying nonsense :
The pure randomness doesn't exists in IT, some "unpredictable" numbers ( such as the time with ms ) are used together and computed so that if gives a very big or small number that is turned to a number between 0 and 1 which ends up as a percent.

But, if we actually consider like randomness ( which we should ), all possible combination have an equal chance to come out with orbs of fusing ..... but as 4L has many many different combinations and 6L much less, the probability to get 6L is very low. This is .... simple.

And usually, when one wants to make a good argument, there is no insult or trashtalk, because it'd makes all credibility vanishing.
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
Last edited by Fruz#6137 on Feb 14, 2013, 7:52:32 AM
"
Fruz wrote:
randomness favoring less links ?
ROFL
( its like in league of legends "I'm a good players but the matchmaking always puts me with noobs, so it's not my fault ).

By the way decode, if you want another subject to continue saying nonsense :
The pure randomness doesn't exists in IT, some "unpredictable" numbers ( such as the time with ms ) are used together and computed so that if gives a very big or small number that is turned to a number between 0 and 1 which ends up as a percent.

But, if we actually consider like randomness ( which we should ), all possible combination have an equal chance to come out with orbs of fusing ..... but as 4L has many many different combinations and 6L much less, the probability to get 6L is very low. This is .... simple.

And usually, when one wants to make a good argument, there is no insult or trashtalk, because it'd makes all credibility vanishing.

The game is favoring less links not the randomness nice reading as well, so far yours were non sense let's see what you even further did. Oh look randomness doesn't exist because some unpredictable numbers are used together and computed. Nice logic I'm not even sure why I counter you by just saying what you wrote lol. Touche I didn't count in 2L 3L and 4L having more possible outcomes still the average needed orbs of making a 6L is not random and more likely manipulated. If you fail to see that an item needs around 100 more of average fusing orbs if not more make a 6L and still call it random sorry my friend you mentally challenged as well or just stubborn. Oh and I'm not even trying to have an argumentation with somebody who claims manipulated shit is still random.
Last edited by Deccode#6112 on Feb 14, 2013, 8:02:58 AM
just a quote for you
"
After I told you that the game is favoring less links on items than more links you still claimed it's still random.

np
sorry for not reading all your pointless posts before that.

"
still the average needed orbs of making a 6L is not random and more likely manipulated

do you .... know the basics of probability ?
Because, apparently, no lol.
go back to college and take some basic maths class, then you will eventually understand what people are saying here and stop wasting the time of everyone.
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
Last edited by Fruz#6137 on Feb 14, 2013, 8:07:13 AM
"
Fruz wrote:
just a quote for you
"
After I told you that the game is favoring less links on items than more links you still claimed it's still random.

np
sorry for not reading all your pointless posts before that.

Hey I actually just read your post history well some of it and from sickness. It's interesting that you are actually arguing with people over the internet in more than half of your posts lol. It's funny to see you guys losing an argument over another subject and then seeking for repair on another lol.
"
Fruz wrote:

do you .... know the basics of probability ?
Because, apparently, no lol.
go back to college and take some basic maths class, then you will eventually understand what people are saying here and stop wasting the time of everyone.

As we can see you do know it lol. Btw do they teach you basic math at college?
Last edited by Deccode#6112 on Feb 14, 2013, 8:09:26 AM
this is a forum, and I'm arguing ...
YOU GOT ME THERE !
nice thing checking historic of people to make an argument btw, you familiar with politic lol ?

I think you have proven your point to everyone here .... or not. But I don't think continuing doing so ( or trying ) will change anything about what people ( the one that had the courage to read some of this ) think about is actually.

I'm just gonna *grab popcorn* and give a look to this thread sometimes to have free facepalms from now on I guess.
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
Last edited by Fruz#6137 on Feb 14, 2013, 8:14:23 AM

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info