What solo mapping from 95-96 looks like

"

tackle70 wrote:

"

Krayken wrote:

And as wamosknecht said : learn to roll and dont be scared to play the hardest mods.

> can't maintain 77+
> can't get his story straight about income
> says "lrn2roll mapz"


lol

you're hilarious

Yes i can maintain lv 77, I said i sometimes have to fall on lvl 76. I can run 90% of my maps 77+. That's all you have left to argue with? That every now and then i run a lvl 76 map when on a rly bad RNG streak? Do you really think that refutes my whole argument? Thats it? How about my 210 exalts profit versus your deficit? Please tell me more about it?

Hell i could just invest HALF of those exalts into onslaught mod and make sure i run lvl 78 maps all the time. But that would be crushing my profit in half, which would be stupid. Only someone like you doesn't seem to mind crushing his profit, by 100% in your case nonetheless.

removed it,didnt read thread from begining.

"

Krayken wrote:

But that would be crushing my profit in half, which would be stupid.

Would that be your profit of 1-1.5 ex every 10 maps, or your profit of 2 ex per 6 maps?

I'm confused. You just make so much money, and it changes every other post you make, it's hard to keep track of your godliness.

"

tackle70 wrote:

"

Krayken wrote:

But that would be crushing my profit in half, which would be stupid.

Would that be your profit of 1-1.5 ex every 10 maps, or your profit of 2 ex per 6 maps?

I'm confused. You just make so much money, and it changes every other post you make, it's hard to keep track of your godliness.

Last night i made 2 ex out of 6-7 maps yeah. RNG is RNG you know. RNG seems to be on my side tonight as well. You mad bro?

How about my 210 ex profit versus your deficit profit? Which one of us has the best way to roll maps exactly?

Your ego is so huge that you can't even admit when you're wrong. You can keep replying and digging that whole you are sinking in.

If you've read the other replies, im clearly not the only one that uses chisel + alch/chaos and can maintain their map pool WHILE making profit.

Not sure if you noticed, but the general consensus in this thread is that zana's onslaught mod is a good way to go bankrupt and guess what? You are the living proof of it. Just pretty funny that it took you 140 freaking maps to realize it AHAHAHAAH.

There are just 2-3 persons in this thread to state they can sustain solo constant 77/78 pool that never dries. All of them acting childish and arrogant, which makes me doubt they are honest.
Not to mention there's no experienced player that may state high maps can be endlessly self sustained, no matter the tricks in rolling them. Besides wild luck, which can't be a permanent state, anyway. Ask any of the 100's, they know better.
People have tried it all - from pack size to alched super high Q and nothing works. Because it's the way it is by design.
In my experience best results are provided by full chisseled pack size/magic regalled onslaught. Nothing unusual, as you can get easily Q80-90 and it performs much better than Q120-140 no pack/magic maps. Yes, it's expensive but quite efficient.
"Best results" means player will be able to support pool for longer, before it goes dry.

"

Krayken wrote:

Last night i made 2 ex out of 6-7 maps yeah. RNG is RNG you know. RNG seems to be on my side tonight as well. You mad bro?

How about my 210 ex profit versus your deficit profit? Which one of us has the best way to roll maps exactly?

Your ego is so huge that you can't even admit when you're wrong. You can keep replying and digging that whole you are sinking in.

lol... you're hilarious
> you made 210 ex since FM dropped by mapping
> you make 1-1.5 ex per 10 maps
> however, you did not run 1400-2100 maps since FM dropped
> but that's OK because you just made 2 exalts running 6 maps
> but actually that's just good RNG

and around and around the BS wheel goes. I can only wonder what it will spin to next!

The bottom line is that your stated profit level (210 ex) does not match your stated income rate (0.1 - 0.15 ex per map) given your stated amount of maps run (700-800 ish). Those numbers aren't even close. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm allergic to bullshit.

What exactly am I wrong about? You can't even get your own story straight.

"

wamosknecht wrote:

"

danisonxtc wrote:

i alc and go every map until lvl 76, lvl 77 are chis + alc and go, lvl 78 mostly also, besides party cant do mapsmods.

and i can only say, that as a player whos map base has been build up for at least 10k maps, i can sustain 75 maps, everything else, runs out pretty much always, its just a matter of time, if it takes 100 maps or 1k maps.

75s are the maps i can currently sell, since i got so many of them, however i regulary buy 76 maps since they still give me "decent" xp what 75 maps dont.

ppl who say they can "sustain" 76+ maps, just dont do enough maps xD i have had many ppl claiming that they can sustain them, 2-3 weeks later, i saw them buying maps xD

Just invest in rolling maps properly and you will sustain even 77+ regardless of how much you are running

rather then spending money on rolling maps, you might as well just buy maps, its way cheaper in most cases

basically you make 2 chaos per map, so 16 maps = 1 ex in standard league

Just roll your boxes well and leveling 95+ not so bad

"

JVIRUS wrote:

Just roll your boxes well and leveling 95+ not so bad

Are these cartographer boxes on images?
Dunno much about them, never found one in maps I play.

Yes, they are cartographers boxes I found in a palace map, and on a shipyard's zana mission. Chaos spammed until +2/3 additional maps + mirrored , then corruptedm one party member with me. They are rare, but for those wishing to level after 95 they are invaluable.


Most of my currency is in Exalt, Eternal, or Divine orbs, and I rarely do the chaos recipe, so I do not have many chaos lying around. After finding a 77 cartographers box without enough chaos to properly spam it...I always have 30-90 sitting around that I leave for ONLY this purpose.