[Poll] Self Found League - SFL /FINISHED

"

Thorien_Kell wrote:

Judging by the numerous posts and reactions this theme is getting regularly, and judging by rate similar posts rise often one would think that there is A LOT of interest going for SFL, and that if not most at least very high percentage of players would definitely want to see SFL introduced.

However this might not be the case. Often the loud minority leaves the impression of like "everybody would want it" but in reality only small number (few percentages?) of players are strongly in favor.

Please bear in mind that task of creating such league is far more comprehansive that untrained eye might think. Serious adjustions should be made SFL to work properly (re adjusting traders goods, drop rates, orbs, skill tree, difficulty..) have no mistake about it, it's serious work.

Final question would it be worth it? Remember, devs can do THAT or working on next patch, more uniques, new spells and more content in general. Is it worth it?

Remember, in true SFL all trading and item interactions between player should be permanently disabled. Permanent PA of diablo type should be imposed. Not only that other players cannot take your gear on floor but they even don't see it. Even if you drop it from INV. Well I would say one thing - at least we wold get rid of RMTers, traders, flippers and insanely rich bas*ards ;) That's big thumb up :)

So this is poll, PLEASE VOTE, it should offer some answers. Please take 2 seconds to respond. Please do not make comments or discussions, all we need here is one single letter, ie. percentage of interested players. We will all (hopefully) be smarter after this and if someone after today maker requests for SFL, providing link to this post could offer him a good answer.

A) I am STRONGLY in favor of SFL, even if it would make other content coming late!
B) I like the idea, wouldn't mind having it put if the price /delay is reasonable.
C) I don't care one way or the other. I could try it but I wouldn't be losing sleep if
. . it's never introduced.
D) I don't care for SFL and it would be bad idea of slowing development down because of
. . handful of SFL fanatics

"

MrMisterMissedHer wrote:

"

Arrowneous wrote:

Sorry for discussing this but the minority who don't want an SFL always have lame reasons for being against it and they are posting their 2¢ so we can't let Wookie win this time.

The problem is that people have different ideas of a SFL. What exactly does the OP describe that's not achievable currently and different?

You'll be asking for increased drops, to start with right? This is understandable because drops can suck ass in the game and the expense in terms of time/reward isn't for everyone. The way it scales in end-game doesn't really help.

It boils down to difficulty (a vague term, to say the least), which trading invariably influences.

So, what if I wanted to play in a SFL but that has roughly the same drops as currently (even lower for certain things) but adjusted end-game accessibility, no shared stash (and limited/no stash), no permanent allocation yet still supporting partying (albeit restricted)?

That's still some form of SFL right, but it's not quite the same as the one you'd want, or the OP describes.

What exactly do people want, I generally struggle to relate, is it just instanced crazy drop fests without trading, or at the least rebalanced to account for no trading?