Left-wing terrorists destroying your neighborhood

"

MrSmiley21 wrote:

"

diablofdb wrote:

edit: also you forgot to mention that the party Nazi was a left wing socialist party

It's true. A lot of former Communist Party members joined the NSDAP and even influenced some of its policies. It was a "join us or we'll kill you" gesture (etc, Night of the Long Knives), similar to how Stalin purged Trotskyites in the USSR. A lot of former Commies just fell right into line and became Nazis. The difference between Nazism and Soviet Communism is about the same as a Conservative vs a Libertarian, or not a whole lot.

The only difference between the Nazis and the USSR was, Nazis were nationalist Socialists and the USSR were globalists socialists

"

diablofdb wrote:

The only difference between the Nazis and the USSR was, Nazis were nationalist Socialists and the USSR were globalists socialists

Another difference was in the USSR, the State owned everything, but this wasn't the case in Germany. Although the State did seize control of some industries. They sought to regulate the market, mostly, but within a pretty tight box. Nazi economics is closer to liberal economic policies of today, ironically. Nazi Germany was Socialism-lite, when the USSR was balls to the wall Socialism.

Bottom line left dont want to pay dues. I look at them as shiftless and lazy then they convince other shiftless and lazy ppl world is unfair and they must fight this perceived injustice. So they start small by stealing from petty theft and like taxes on political level then as things get worse and worse because normals dont like working for free the left gets violent.

Left is just basically major underachievers. Wouldnt be so bad if they left everyone else alone and died in a gutter but thats not what happens.

"

MrSmiley21 wrote:

"

diablofdb wrote:

The only difference between the Nazis and the USSR was, Nazis were nationalist Socialists and the USSR were globalists socialists

Another difference was in the USSR, the State owned everything, but this wasn't the case in Germany. Although the State did seize control of some industries. They sought to regulate the market, mostly, but within a pretty tight box. Nazi economics is closer to liberal economic policies of today, ironically. Nazi Germany was Socialism-lite, when the USSR was balls to the wall Socialism.

They own your business here too. I must have like 3 licenses to even practice what I do which is not complex I operate heavy equipment. Not a doctor or anything i move fucking dirt around.. They there are millions of rules what I can do and how to treat employees. Then i pay every quarter 10s of thousands of dollars to IRS. Sometimes I feel like I work for government instead of me. How would you like seeing six figures in bank then after checks are written you have 4. I have to save ever receipt and every contract for contractors board, IRS, and Ca franchise board for 10 years. Thats what owning your own business is like in communist USA.

"

Aim_Deep wrote:

They own your business here too. I must have like 3 licenses to even practice what I do which is not complex I operate heavy equipment. They there are millions of rules what I can do and how to treat employees. Then i pay every quarter 10s of thousands of dollars to IRS. Sometimes I feel like I work for government instead of me. How would you like seeing six figures in bank then after checks are written you have 4. Thats what owning your own business is like in communist USA.

Yeah, but if you hit someone with a track hoe arm and put them in a wheelchair, you shouldn't have to pay anything in damages, right? What right does the government have to decide someone should get paid for getting hit by a track hoe? Even someone in a wheelchair can be a greeter at Walmart, for $2.50/hr (because the government shouldn't set a minimum wage) which means they shouldn't get disability either. If they're hungry, they got soup kitchens they can eat at, so no food stamps either. - in the world of Aim_Deep.

"

MrSmiley21 wrote:

"

Aim_Deep wrote:

They own your business here too. I must have like 3 licenses to even practice what I do which is not complex I operate heavy equipment. They there are millions of rules what I can do and how to treat employees. Then i pay every quarter 10s of thousands of dollars to IRS. Sometimes I feel like I work for government instead of me. How would you like seeing six figures in bank then after checks are written you have 4. Thats what owning your own business is like in communist USA.

Yeah, but if you hit someone with a track hoe arm and put them in a wheelchair, you shouldn't have to pay anything in damages, right? What right does the government have to decide someone should get paid for getting hit by a track hoe? Even someone in a wheelchair can be a greeter at Walmart, for $2.50/hr (because the government shouldn't set a minimum wage) which means they shouldn't get disability either. If they're hungry, they got soup kitchens they can eat at, so no food stamps either. - in the world of Aim Deep.

Of course you should pay thats a tort. But thats not what government is about. Its taking money from produces to feed deadbeats of both rags and riches.

"

Aim_Deep wrote:

Of course you should pay thats a tort. But thats not what government is about. Its taking money from produces to feed deadbeats of both rags and riches.

To put things on as simple of terms as possible, let's say society is a round hole. Some people are square pegs. Square pegs don't fit in round holes. Some of these people are lazy, sure, but some of them have a number of other underlying issues that keep them from fitting in the round hole.

What's your solution?

- Should we just make them the government's indentured servants?
- Should we legally euthanize some people who've committed no serious crimes?
- Should we offer assisted suicide for people who've just "given up"?

I'm really, legitimately curious what the anarcho-capitalist solution is.

Lets try true capitalism again like that built this country from nothing to #1 in 100 short years. You'd be surprised how adversity makes ppl stronger. Basically i don;t believe in square pegs or round holes. We are all amorphous and will adapt. Granted some ppl need help truly disabled and such but charity always took care of them fine.

You wanna know what I'd do under anarcho-capitalism, or turn-of-the-century USA? I'd run a criminal enterprise. Several of my relatives in the past were bootleggers during the prohibition. One of my great grandfathers raised 6 kids, and was a full time bootlegger. He was pretty wealthy when he died. Never worked an honest day in his adult life, and from what I understand, he bragged about not working an honest days work, ever. In other words, he was belligerent. Just like me. Runs in the family. It's what they call genetically inherited personality traits.

You throw me in an environment that's super cutthroat, and super competitive, I can get extremely vicious. Worse than toxic. It honestly doesn't bring the best out in me, but the worst. To the point where primitive survival mechanisms in my brain start to take control of my behavior. Enhanced by my psychosis. With zero conscience. Once I'm pushed to that point, all of my behavior becomes justified, in my mind. Because life becomes about ruthless, cutthroat survival. Some of my ancestors probably survived in ancient times because some weren't beyond killing someone over a loaf of bread - every single day if they had to. When most would resign to their fates and die slowly from starvation before killing someone.

Selling alcohol to adults isn't "cutthroat criminality". It should've never been prohibited in the first place, just like other drugs shouldn't be prohibited now. It was technically illegal, but hardly immoral.

Speaking of truly cutthroat things, the market already accounts for bad actors. The risk is priced in -- by robbing people you can stand to gain a lot, and stand to lose your life. In the end, it's not much different than spending more time on a less risky venture.

Outside of suicidals, I've never met a single person that would rather starve than try to save themselves. Hunger is completely overwhelming and all civility and morals don't mean shit when it sets in. Our current peaceful civilization only exists because people have food.