Hillary Clinton

Interesting sources you've got there.

A guy with a big ass banner on "The war against Jihad" showing Muslims holding American flags and smiling. I'm sure he's an open minded chap.

And then he's quoting what appears to be a tabloid "newspaper", with the note:

* Full disclosure, The New York Observer is published by Jared Kushner, Donald Trump's son-in-law.



Seems fair, and I'm 100% sure you can take everything they say at face value. I'm sure it's completely unbiased and 100% truthful.

"

Glowerss wrote:

Interesting sources you've got there.

A guy with a big ass banner on "The war against Jihad" showing Muslims holding American flags and smiling. I'm sure he's an open minded chap.

And then he's quoting what appears to be a tabloid "newspaper", with the note:

* Full disclosure, The New York Observer is published by Jared Kushner, Donald Trump's son-in-law.



Seems fair, and I'm 100% sure you can take everything they say at face value. I'm sure it's completely unbiased and 100% truthful.

Which of Donald's family members owns the New York Times?

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/13/us/politics/13donate.html?pagewanted=print&_r=0

So this might not be the first time the Clinton campaign has had donor "issues."

Snopes didn't dismiss it either, but when I checked their site it was still in the "undertermined" category.

http://www.snopes.com/clinton-campaign-overcharging-donors/

The NBC affiliate TV station in Minneapolis also carried a piece about this story:

http://www.kare11.com/news/investigations/kare-11-investigates-unauthorized-charges-by-clinton-campaign/229158541

There are two flaws with your presumption:

1) "Shooting the messenger" is a subdivision of the ad hominem logical fallacy.

2) An association fallacy is an informal inductive fallacy of the hasty-generalization or red-herring type and which asserts, by irrelevant association and often by appeal to emotion, that qualities of one thing are inherently qualities of another. Two types of association fallacies are sometimes referred to as guilt by association and honor by association.

Your second two articles are investigating the claims. This is quite a bit different than the thing that Mr. Ray linked.

I should also point out that your NYTimes article actually completely contradicts the one you're trying to say it backs up. The article in question is mostly about whether or not Clinton actually surpassed Obama when it comes to fund raising record, and simply notes that there were some payment issues which brought it below Obama's total. When you're raising millions from hundreds of thousands of individual payments and purchases, mistakes are inevitable.

The article pretty much notes as much:

"

All the presidential campaigns have had erroneous or invalid donations.

"

The Clinton campaign scoffed at any suggestion that it could have gamed the system to come out ahead (there is no evidence that it did)

I don't particularly care one way or another (both candidates are absolute garbage), but if you're gonna hysterically hand wave about how Hillary is the devil, at least use credible stuff.

Hillary does not have the health to persevere as president, she can barely campaign at 1/5th the capacity as the Donald.

Not to mention her energy is so low, Bernie and Trump crowds are huge, whereas Clinton is boring and has trouble bringing the crowd.

Bernie vs Trump pls, shake n bake baby

Marxist news channel MSNBC confirms Hillary was the racist one before it was cool:

https://youtu.be/_QwEebZSSnk?t=8s

"

Xavderion wrote:

Marxist news channel MSNBC confirms Hillary was the racist one before it was cool:

https://youtu.be/_QwEebZSSnk?t=8s

Lol. MSNBC is in no way a Marxist news channel. "Left" leaning, I will give you that, but not close to being Marxist. And Scarborough leans right, far from Marxism.

This business about Hilary or her campaign spreading the birther rumors has been checked and rechecked and as President Obama says there is no there, there. It looks as though a Clinton supporter started this, and there is no evidence of any ties to Clinton or her campaign.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/sep/16/donald-trump/fact-checking-donald-trumps-claim-hillary-clinton-/

I come for the orwellian levels of reality denying and you never dissapoint. Keep going!

"

Xavderion wrote:

"

NeroNoah wrote:

dark

Tfw your signature isn't ironic after all.

My signature is a trigger for Trump supporters at reddit by design (specially those at /r/the_donald). I play the long game.

In Europe the first debate starts at 2 a.m. (London), 3 a.m. (Berlin) or 4 a.m. (Athens) Tuesday(27th) morning, right ? (9 p.m. or 21:00 h ET on Monday(26th))

http://www.weltzeit.de/zeitzonenkarte.php

(world time map)

Why are you randomly using the echoes?

"

Xavderion wrote:

Why are you randomly using the echoes?

reddit is da hint yo.

I be a badass motherfucker dropping it on foolz. if you fakku with me, you done goofed up boi.

-this quality post brought to you by Coca Cola. stay fresh, like a prince -