GGG, I have an intellectual question for you.

"
CharanJaydemyr wrote:
The balloon already popped. Why are you still blowing so hard?


Bias and opinions on the matters of perspective do not make all so.

You still have a lot of conundrums to consider, Charan. Please don't be hasty about this and give me the benefit of the doubt.
You will never see a man faking anger, passion and relentless behavior.

You will always see a man faking love, politeness and respectful behavior.
Last edited by Deceptionist#1813 on May 6, 2014, 1:02:44 AM
"
Deceptionist wrote:
People can't be exiled - ideas can be exiled.


I'll leave you with this: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exile
"
Mivo wrote:
"
Deceptionist wrote:
People can't be exiled - ideas can be exiled.


I'll leave you with this: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exile


I know the illusion.

I know the different contexts of exile.

I understand witticism and irony.

I understand the definition of exile.

What I don't understand is how these characters are exiles, but show 0 evidence of expressing the nature of an exile (based on the definition).

Then when it comes to the definition of "exile", again, it's pure hubris and false-sense of power and control. Nobody can take away the will of anybody - only do they abuse physics to shut them out, which is again absurd because if nature did not work this way, whence cometh the "exile"?
You will never see a man faking anger, passion and relentless behavior.

You will always see a man faking love, politeness and respectful behavior.
Last edited by Deceptionist#1813 on May 6, 2014, 1:14:59 AM
Why did the Romans call those of fundamentally different cultures barbarians, if they still had functional cultures of their own? The non-Romans may not have been civilized in the same way as the Romans, but they were still civilized, no? Then why call them barbarians?

Because they don't live in Oriath, that's why. Sheesh.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
Why did the Romans call those of fundamentally different cultures barbarians, if they still had functional cultures of their own? The non-Romans may not have been civilized in the same way as the Romans, but they were still civilized, no? Then why call them barbarians?

Because they don't live in Oriath, that's why. Sheesh.


They were all barbarians in nature, so what then is a barbarian if all is one?

The same applies to the exiled.

The same applies to hatred.

Can't imply inflection, if all reflection is absolution.
You will never see a man faking anger, passion and relentless behavior.

You will always see a man faking love, politeness and respectful behavior.
Last edited by Deceptionist#1813 on May 6, 2014, 1:44:28 AM
"
CharanJaydemyr wrote:
The balloon already popped. Why are you still blowing so hard?


Maybe he wants to be part of us :<
GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
"
Deceptionist wrote:
They were all barbarians in nature, so what then is a barbarian if all is one?

The same applies to the exiled.

The same applies to hatred.

Can't imply inflection, if all reflection is absolution.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
"
CharanJaydemyr wrote:
Barbarus hic ego sum quia non intelligor ulli.
That made more sense than what Deceptionist says. And that's in fucking Latin.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
Okay, since you're having a hard time understanding what I'm trying to explain, I'll use metaphors instead.

Let's take two opposing groups for an example.

Group A is about X.

Group B is about Y.

---

A person is about being an individual.

Others are about exiling the individual.

---

Group A claims Y about X.

Group B Claims X about Y.

---

The individual is an individual.

Others say they are not an individual, but an exile.

---

Group A attacks Y for X.

Group B defends X for Y.

---

The individual is outnumbered by physical forces, and in fear of their own physical force's health, they submit.

Others attack the individual, outnumbering them until they cannot take the pressure anymore.

--

Let me ask this one last time! Is this really about "an exile" - or is this about "being exiled"? There is a difference between the noun and the verb; both equally dismantled with proper definitive analysis.
You will never see a man faking anger, passion and relentless behavior.

You will always see a man faking love, politeness and respectful behavior.
"
CharanJaydemyr wrote:
THAT ISN'T A METAPHOR!

brain...in....pain...


Yes it is, I just wrote it in a free-to-be-anything-you-want-form... I was just writing out the formula, I never ever said I was going to fill it in. Oh wait... I did!

The metaphor is right there! Maybe it's not visual, because it's perceptual, Charan! The metaphor isn't an object - the metaphor is an action between Group A and Group B compared to being exiled and doing the exiling.

Oh wait, no... It's just an illusion - nah, I'm kidding - it's really a fucking metaphor that went right over your head.
You will never see a man faking anger, passion and relentless behavior.

You will always see a man faking love, politeness and respectful behavior.
Last edited by Deceptionist#1813 on May 6, 2014, 2:14:37 AM

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info