Rip birdtup #1 nem

"
AluCarD1911 wrote:
[Removed by Admin]

1. he had ENOUGH time to react to that bleeding
2. he even tried to logout after he died lol
3. shows how hardcore players play: if something gets hard push the logout button. yelling about scrubcore but are worse then them

btw: he deserved it. not because im jelly just because he abused the freeze mine bug like no one else.


... seriously ?
IGN : @Morgoth
Suspect REEEP... he had so much time to react... and logged off when he was clearly REEEP.

"
NekoHanten wrote:
fake imo
"
FedeS wrote:
Suspect REEEP... he had so much time to react... and logged off when he was clearly REEEP.

"
NekoHanten wrote:
fake imo


That's what happens when you die due to falling asleep...
some nobody died, big deal
Ha! Thanks for the laugh. Maybe get a life and get some sleep.

Not like it matters really anyway, he will just reroll some other toon up to lvl 98.

But again, thanks for the chuckles.
"
zaberisk wrote:
"
Kenzorz wrote:
Must be fun planning a build that takes 99.9% life nodes (on a Ranger too lol) and playing that all the way to 98.

No wonder he fell asleep.


that´s how people play nemesis ..


I actually wasn't targeting Nemesis/hardcore players with my comment. I know that they must take a lot of life nodes to not die. I've seen streams of top Nemesis players and they usually have 5k-7k life, 7k is already the top end of life stackers meaning maybe around 70-80% life nodes.

This etup guy, has almost 10k life and isn't even a RF build. i.e. he has even more life nodes than those with 7k life meaning his passive tree is probably entirely life nodes, hence why I said 99.9%.

Oh and he plays this build with Spectral Throw...lol. #1 zzzz build.
"so you can see who has more PvPenis" - Chris Wilson
"Everyone can at least be exposed to Leo's PvPenis" - Chris Wilson
"
Kenzorz wrote:
"
zaberisk wrote:
"
Kenzorz wrote:
Must be fun planning a build that takes 99.9% life nodes (on a Ranger too lol) and playing that all the way to 98.

No wonder he fell asleep.


that´s how people play nemesis ..


I actually wasn't targeting Nemesis/hardcore players with my comment. I know that they must take a lot of life nodes to not die. I've seen streams of top Nemesis players and they usually have 5k-7k life, 7k is already the top end of life stackers meaning maybe around 70-80% life nodes.

This etup guy, has almost 10k life and isn't even a RF build. i.e. he has even more life nodes than those with 7k life meaning his passive tree is probably entirely life nodes, hence why I said 99.9%.

Oh and he plays this build with Spectral Throw...lol. #1 zzzz build.


Facepalm
"
Kenzorz wrote:
"
zaberisk wrote:
"
Kenzorz wrote:
Must be fun planning a build that takes 99.9% life nodes (on a Ranger too lol) and playing that all the way to 98.

No wonder he fell asleep.


that´s how people play nemesis ..


I actually wasn't targeting Nemesis/hardcore players with my comment. I know that they must take a lot of life nodes to not die. I've seen streams of top Nemesis players and they usually have 5k-7k life, 7k is already the top end of life stackers meaning maybe around 70-80% life nodes.

This etup guy, has almost 10k life and isn't even a RF build. i.e. he has even more life nodes than those with 7k life meaning his passive tree is probably entirely life nodes, hence why I said 99.9%.

Oh and he plays this build with Spectral Throw...lol. #1 zzzz build.


He can take that many life nodes because he has an awesome weapon and more than enough damage. Speecing into more damage nodes is just risky versus certain reflect scenarios, not to mention there's no need for more damage.
I feel sorry for him. On stream he seemed like a nice guy basicly and put a lot of effort into the whole thing. RIP
"
I feel sorry for him. On stream he seemed like a nice guy basicly and put a lot of effort into the whole thing. RIP

+1
Level 100 Ranger fb_stnemesis
Level 100 Witch fb_HungarianWitch
Level 100 Scion fb_scioonn
In game mostly at CEST 6PM-8PM (not every day), except weekends

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info