Feature Request - "Censor bar" microtransaction nudity filter

"

szteto wrote:

If you want to show pornographic materials to kids, that means you are a sexual predator, and I'll be damned if I'm going to be lectured by a pervert.

By that logic, I guess showing violent material to kids make you a murderer?

On the flip, all that pornography in the Sistine Chapel makes sense with your statement.

"

ggnorekthx wrote:

Please say NO to senseless censorship!

It's hardly censorship if it's voluntary.

"

szteto wrote:

"

Epicly_Curious wrote:

There is no discussion. GGG has responded to a few of these threads with even more sarcastic responses, at least Russel did. They clearly have declined your "I am offended" bullshit :P

Sorry, but where did OP say he was offended? Making a suggestion that would make it more convenient to play the game, and even offering to pay for it as an opt-in service =/= "I am offended."

Threads like this a byproduct of that format of thinking.

This thread is awesome!!!

Now we have a szteto poster who has only 1 char, a lvl 1 in standard, who makes even worse analogies than the OP (assuming they are not the same person).

I love your answers to the gore issue, no problem it seems with piles of dead bodies and rivers of blood in lunaris but a barely perceptible nude image of a statue is worthy of a microtransaction filter.

I support your right to ask for this microtransaction, but I also support those questioning your motives to do so.

Its all moot though as GGG are surely laughing as hard as we are at you new attempt to bring this very important topic up again. Sincere thanks to putting entertaining me at work today.

"

szteto wrote:

"

Miszou wrote:

^ LOL

Please enlighten me. And use short words, as I seem to be too immature to understand.

If you want to show pornographic materials to kids, that means you are a sexual predator, and I'll be damned if I'm going to be lectured by a pervert.

lolwut?

I honestly don't have any response to this. It's so far beyond ridiculous that you're either trolling or... or.. I don't know. I really don't know.

Is this a real thing?

I can only hope that you're trolling and this is some kind of elaborate invocation of Poes Law, because the only other option is that you're so fundamentally repressed as to be completely dysfunctional as a human being.

It blows my mind that people here are so simple and narrow minded that they can't accept the validity of a suggestion that would have absolutely no effect on them whatsoever.

"

szteto wrote:

It blows my mind that people here are so simple and narrow minded that they can't accept the validity of a nude statue that would have absolutely no effect on them whatsoever.

ftfy

You guys know you can find porn anywhere on the internet, right? You don't HAVE to defend the naked statues so aggressively, there are plenty of other tits out there for you to gawp at.

"

szteto wrote:

"

HAJIMEdj wrote:

Pornography =/= nudity, and vice versa.

Now, pretend you're an 6 year old. Do you still know the difference?

YES. So obviously yes. You should seriously hand in your opinion license; your opinions are so wrong that you no longer warrant one.

A 6 year old understands that when her baby brother suckles on her mother's breast, that's he's not having sex with her.
A 6 year old understands that when she gets changed into her pyjamas at night, or gets undressed for bath time, she's not having sex. She's not trying to titillate anyone. She's not performing for the sexual gratification of others. She's not doing anything wrong, or indecent. She's just having a f*cking bath.

Hell, even a 2 year old understand there is nothing wrong with nudity in the above contexts. It sounds like children understand nudity a lot better than you do.

IF the statues in PoE were committing pornographic acts, or attacking you by hitting you with their penises or something, then sure, ask for censor bars. But otherwise - really?
"Why are those statues naked, mummy?"
"Because that's how they were made, darling." It's not hard.
I mean seriously, do you put censor bars on your bathroom mirrors at home, in case someone accidentally sees themselves when naked? Do you get your kids to wear those plastic collars for injured dogs when they get changed, in case they see their evil, pornographic naked bodies?

When someone's understanding of reality is so far removed from it that they continue to argue that nudity is in itself bad, they should no longer get to participate in reality or any discussion of it. Go back to your puritan fantasy word; and preferably don't take any children with you.

[Removed by Admin]