|
Guys and Girls that play this, great game, what do you think of Inventory Slot increase as micro transaction in the shop, I would personally pay $50 if we could get double the size of the current Inventory. I believe GGG would make a killing and make so many peoples lives easier with this account feature! Please let me know what you all think, I maybe wrong cause I have only been playing the game for 5 months and loving it!
This thread has been automatically archived. Replies are disabled.
|
Posted bytherabbi#5392on Oct 14, 2013, 8:35:16 PMBanned
|
|
Hi there,
Thank you so much for your suggestion! I can see how this would make things easier, but unfortunately it would be classified as 'pay to win' as it would give players an unfair in game advantage based on a monetary contribution. If you have any further suggestions please don't hesitate to let us know! We are happy to hear them :)
|
Posted byBex_GGGon Oct 14, 2013, 8:48:24 PMGrinding Gear Games
|
|
Thanks for your reply, I understand :-)
|
Posted bytherabbi#5392on Oct 14, 2013, 9:05:02 PMBanned
|
|
How about making them a teensier bit bigger for free then? :P
|
Posted byOrkan#2820on Oct 15, 2013, 2:19:57 AM
|
"
Bex_GGG wrote:
Hi there,
Thank you so much for your suggestion! I can see how this would make things easier, but unfortunately it would be classified as 'pay to win' as it would give players an unfair in game advantage based on a monetary contribution. If you have any further suggestions please don't hesitate to let us know! We are happy to hear them :)
I agree with you, and I am also curious about the logic that deems this feature pay2win but not stash tabs. If you could share that with me, I'd be grateful. I've been curious for a long time. The features seem analogous to me: a simple convenience.
(For the record, I don't mind having paid for the tabs I have, but I don't consider them any less of a pay2win purchase than the OP's suggestion.)
Also, I agree with Orkan's suggestion to make the inventory size bigger, by exactly one row of squares (for everyone, not just microtransaction purchasers). Because of the distribution of item types and sizes, there is invariably a lot of unused space at the bottom of your inventory that cannot be used at all, even if you play tetris with your items. Adding one additional row would alleviate that issue.
Wash your hands, Exile! Last edited by gibbousmoon#4656 on Oct 15, 2013, 5:02:57 AM
|
Posted bygibbousmoon#4656on Oct 15, 2013, 4:50:41 AM
|
"
gibbousmoon wrote:
"
Bex_GGG wrote:
Hi there,
Thank you so much for your suggestion! I can see how this would make things easier, but unfortunately it would be classified as 'pay to win' as it would give players an unfair in game advantage based on a monetary contribution. If you have any further suggestions please don't hesitate to let us know! We are happy to hear them :)
I agree with you, and I am also curious about the logic that deems this feature pay2win but not stash tabs. If you could share that with me, I'd be grateful. I've been curious for a long time. The features seem analogous to me: a simple convenience.
(For the record, I don't mind having paid for the tabs I have, but I don't consider them any less of a pay2win purchase than the OP's suggestion.)
[..]
They did not strictly disagree at your point afaik, however they don't forbid muling accounts for this purpose. This gives people not wanting to spend their money the alternative to make them unlimitend.
P4Convenience4TW
Last edited by Nightmare90#4217 on Oct 15, 2013, 5:25:49 AM
|
Posted byNightmare90#4217on Oct 15, 2013, 5:23:37 AM
|
"
gibbousmoon wrote:
"
Bex_GGG wrote:
Hi there,
Thank you so much for your suggestion! I can see how this would make things easier, but unfortunately it would be classified as 'pay to win' as it would give players an unfair in game advantage based on a monetary contribution. If you have any further suggestions please don't hesitate to let us know! We are happy to hear them :)
I agree with you, and I am also curious about the logic that deems this feature pay2win but not stash tabs. If you could share that with me, I'd be grateful. I've been curious for a long time. The features seem analogous to me: a simple convenience.
(For the record, I don't mind having paid for the tabs I have, but I don't consider them any less of a pay2win purchase than the OP's suggestion.)
Also, I agree with Orkan's suggestion to make the inventory size bigger, by exactly one row of squares (for everyone, not just microtransaction purchasers). Because of the distribution of item types and sizes, there is invariably a lot of unused space at the bottom of your inventory that cannot be used at all, even if you play tetris with your items. Adding one additional row would alleviate that issue.
Because having extra stash tabs does not affect your wealth earned per hour nearly as much as inventory slots would.
This message was delivered by GGG defence force.
|
Posted bymazul#2568on Oct 15, 2013, 5:25:34 AM
|
|
<redacted>
Personal Item Filter(s):
https://www.pathofexile.com/item-filter/Rxpet8 Last edited by Censurri#7561 on Feb 9, 2021, 11:05:24 PM
|
Posted byCensurri#7561on Oct 15, 2013, 2:46:10 PM
|
|
this would affect map farming to much, other then maps it would save you a tp and 10 seconds in town which would be ok... maps it would let you take more out of the limited 6 portals
|
Posted byLordDargath#1080on Oct 15, 2013, 3:43:34 PM
|
"
gibbousmoon wrote:
"
Bex_GGG wrote:
Hi there,
Thank you so much for your suggestion! I can see how this would make things easier, but unfortunately it would be classified as 'pay to win' as it would give players an unfair in game advantage based on a monetary contribution. If you have any further suggestions please don't hesitate to let us know! We are happy to hear them :)
I agree with you, and I am also curious about the logic that deems this feature pay2win but not stash tabs. If you could share that with me, I'd be grateful. I've been curious for a long time. The features seem analogous to me: a simple convenience.
(For the record, I don't mind having paid for the tabs I have, but I don't consider them any less of a pay2win purchase than the OP's suggestion.)
Also, I agree with Orkan's suggestion to make the inventory size bigger, by exactly one row of squares (for everyone, not just microtransaction purchasers). Because of the distribution of item types and sizes, there is invariably a lot of unused space at the bottom of your inventory that cannot be used at all, even if you play tetris with your items. Adding one additional row would alleviate that issue.
It allows certain players to carry more items, be it items to swap, more items to sell etc
|
Posted byPeenk#2338on Oct 15, 2013, 3:49:50 PM
|
