Looting -- The official thread for discussing the loot system. Updated 18th March, 2013.

"
SL4Y3R wrote:

So, the burden of proof remains on you. If you cannot provide such proof. You are wrong. This is not an opinion, this is a fact.


That's ridiculous. Just because you cant prove it doesnt mean its wrong.

All the anti FFA is for me sufficient evidence that the majority does want a change.

But as I said, you dont need majority support to add an option.
"
SL4Y3R wrote:
Actually, I'm just saying it's not the majority because you can't prove it.

So, the burden of proof remains on you. If you cannot provide such proof. You are wrong. This is not an opinion, this is a fact.

Now if GGG were to come out and say their statistics show..... Than they could prove whatever.

However, you nor I do not have this information. So I cannot say the majority like FFA (which I haven't), and you cannot say the majority hate it (which you have).

Understand?


Not having statistical proof of something does NOT automaticly make it wrong/false and the opposing side of the argument right/true.

It's pretty clear that a lot of people are dissatisfied with this aspect of a game that in most regards has received overwhelmingly positive feedback.


On topic:

I'm not a fan of the current system, makes people focus more of winning the inevitable "click war" every time a rare mob goes down, rather than fighting it out and then reaping the benefits of the battle.

For me it just means that I mostly play solo. Would love the ability to choose when joining a party - a feature I can't see why you "cut throat" looters seem to be so opposed to having.
IGN's:
Nemesis: "Stocktons". HC: "Magomedrasul" & "Stockton".
Last edited by Machida#2999 on Jan 28, 2013, 2:06:16 AM
Correct Mach.

Unfortunately, he's stating it like its a fact, without giving actual evidence. The burden of proof is always on the one who makes the claim. His claim is the majority of people dislike FFA. His proof? That several threads pop up so it must be true.

That does not make his claim true.
Last edited by SL4Y3R#7487 on Jan 28, 2013, 2:05:52 AM
Timer just needs to be 1 min for Rares and 1 and half mins for Unique's. If not that then just permanently lock the loot so you get what has your name on it and then no more problems. If you are going to even add loot system with a built in loot selection system why even have a timer? If you wanted to try and make it fair by picking at random who's drop it is then there never should of been a timer should just be the name and lock that never goes away.
"
leroy989 wrote:
Timer just needs to be 1 min for Rares and 1 and half mins for Unique's. If not that then just permanently lock the loot so you get what has your name on it and then no more problems. If you are going to even add loot system with a built in loot selection system why even have a timer? If you wanted to try and make it fair by picking at random who's drop it is then there never should of been a timer should just be the name and lock that never goes away.


The timer was not added so you would be guaranteed loot.

Sorry.

I hope it never will be too.
"
SL4Y3R wrote:
Correct Mach.

Unfortunately, he's stating it like its a fact, without giving actual evidence. The burden of proof is always on the one who makes the claim. His claim is the majority of people dislike FFA. His proof? That several threads pop up so it must be true.

That does not make his claim true.


It does not. And I agree that it is never smart to use concrete words as "fact" without proof for the sake of furthering your argument.

However if you look at the amount of posts on the topic of looting, it is clear that it is a topic on which a lot of people aren't happy with the current model.
IGN's:
Nemesis: "Stocktons". HC: "Magomedrasul" & "Stockton".
"
BitmapFrogs wrote:
If they change it, they might get more "greens" mid and long term, but there is a chance "reds" will drop the game.

The reds will stay, its just that they are so vocal now to try to somehow counteract the increasing number of people asking for loot-options.
After all, where will their "selfentitled-hardcoress" go? to d3? to tl2? to d2? lol
And if, in worst case scenario, some of them go it's almost negligible because they are so few anyway. So a few of a few is almost nothing, easily balanced by the new incoming casuals/prosumers.
And dont worry, every only-ffa advocate knows that the majority wants loot-options. They are not stupid, they just won't admit it in public.

"
SL4Y3R wrote:
Niche game for a niche market.
Nothings gotta give.

It's damn easy to risk someone else's money, isn't it? After all you won't go to a casino and bet all your money on 13 black just because you're sure of it.
So don't make high risk bets with ggg money.
"
Machida wrote:
"
SL4Y3R wrote:
Correct Mach.

Unfortunately, he's stating it like its a fact, without giving actual evidence. The burden of proof is always on the one who makes the claim. His claim is the majority of people dislike FFA. His proof? That several threads pop up so it must be true.

That does not make his claim true.


It does not. And I agree that it is never smart to use concrete words as "fact" without proof for the sake of furthering your argument.

However if you look at the amount of posts on the topic of looting, it is clear that it is a topic on which a lot of people aren't happy with the current model.


You are also assuming, that:

1. All posts here are Unique Users.
2. All posts are containing complaints.
"
Worldbreaker wrote:
"
Machida wrote:
"
SL4Y3R wrote:
Correct Mach.

Unfortunately, he's stating it like its a fact, without giving actual evidence. The burden of proof is always on the one who makes the claim. His claim is the majority of people dislike FFA. His proof? That several threads pop up so it must be true.

That does not make his claim true.


It does not. And I agree that it is never smart to use concrete words as "fact" without proof for the sake of furthering your argument.

However if you look at the amount of posts on the topic of looting, it is clear that it is a topic on which a lot of people aren't happy with the current model.


You are also assuming, that:

1. All posts here are Unique Users.
2. All posts are containing complaints.


No I'm not.

But I'm sure if you really wanted to find out, you could count all the unique users actually voicing their dissatifaction with the current system.

I know these threads can go on for pages of two guys going back and forth, but on the topic of looting it's more than just a handful of people ;)
IGN's:
Nemesis: "Stocktons". HC: "Magomedrasul" & "Stockton".
Regarding some numbers/facts, moikpei started to actually count post by post in this thread.
You can see the results for only the first 70 pages of 330 so far.
The numbers speak for themself, no matter what or how manipulative the only-ffa-advocates are.
I'm pretty sure after counting all the posts from the entire thread a statistics researcher/worker could actually make a almost spot-on "exit-poll" on the situation ... after all the sample used is more than representative.

"
moikpei wrote:

I COUNTED
I'M STILL COUNTING

BY PAGE 70:
- 168 Users had participated
- Chris last seen on Page 54
- Kyadytim had a pro tier idea back on pages 40-44; something along the lines of if you're not looting you're getting an XP boost. Well thought out posts, go back and read them.
- Multiple Leagues is the most common "other compromise" with "Leader Decides" being the next most common.
- A lot of the people in "No Definable Opinion" were simply whining about the concept of FFA without staking out a position. They were dumped in there for not expressly giving an opinion, but most there seem to have misgivings about FFA.
- New participants start flooding in around page 60. Page 66 goes off topic and leads to a load of No Opinion allocations.

For Instanced (19):
Oasisbhrnw (Silver), Vandro (Bronze), Rambada (Basic), Silver (Basic), Appolian, Deletrix, el_puno, Fruitlord, Golbarin, Isobar, Kempeth, Malice, Mondune, PiotrStark, Rhesos, sommarlov, Tnargav, turbo4i4ka, willam819,

For Timer Extension (3):
CarniavalKlowns, Shark, THEMuffinMan

For Loot-Options (84):
Covert (Diamond), deoxys (Diamond), Skivverus (Diamond), Tertium_Quid (Diamond), Wittgenstein (Diamond), SpudOfDoom (Gold), bersi23 (Silver), Arkwright (Bronze), DarkRookie (Basic), ACLerok, Archartugan, Awesomeasusual, Bartuc, betamancer, bkboggy, CAKE, Corpsepaint, cp_clegg, cybrim, darkcoug, darklord, drakkos, eversorgod, Fluffy, Happy_Thoughts, Hartbrot, Herflik, Kahoder, Killendino, Kress, Kyadytim, Lichalfred, Medenna, Mitch424242, Narfi, nermind, ness, Nightblaze1, obscenerainbow, p0rt, permaximum, Phouriuh, PoERickety, purepower, Riflo, Rustychops, Sadinar, samerath, ShadowTiger, StonerPride, the_jebler, tormenta, zeto, ZhugeLiang, ixarus, Solipcyst, Arcolus, Madav, Celtica, frage069, Stalin828, Dertold, subbypuppyjay, Jive299, Cipher, reiv, Bloodyscissors, zriL, Scorpion, GunHammers, heavensDemise, Archfiend, xMCxRogue, Boryoku, Magni_Steelheart, Myrdinn, Killimangiro, nanahsu, monks, Rokksolid, insidethesun, TheOatman, Moonshine211, BLACKMAGE,

For Keeping Current (16):
Chris (Developer), Zidjian (Silver), tpapp157 (Bronze), Drunk, Hubb, innoruk, Kalyndrel, vahss3, Wisdom, Zephyroth, Menace1024, excalaber, wildleg, respon, cmemmons, manny

Endorses Full FFA (18):
sartormc (Silver), Kaylos (Bronze), andrevv84, Bulkathos, ieatsoap, resira, Vilneus, Zirfith, turtuma85, Kerish, Abydos, jmackay, Smradd, MarcelTorres, PsychoRomeo, Alahadi, Celestias, Scopen

No Definable Opinion/Just Asked Questions (28):
Necx (Gold), wakko (Silver), Ameladol (Basic), madwasp, Nopchar, ResidentHippy, Septile, Ambergino, valaki8, ViralTonic, elhomerjas, Puphy, xerdion94, Kookro, Bladewing, Steelprimus, Starzon29, Kayze, spiritual12, balzdragon, Muerte18, Ferous, Megas_, Mxyzptlk, Icoblablubb, Dogrec, VaJayJayWalker, gokub27
Last edited by mobutu#5362 on Jan 28, 2013, 2:33:30 AM

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info