You don't know what makes Dark Souls fun
+1 OP. Nailed it.
|
![]() |
" This is categorically false. Kiting enemies, prioritizing enemies to prevent being surrounded or killed from greater threats, is the definition of methodical and I think what GGG is going for on the normal engagements. There's nothing methodical about the automaticity of flickering and screen clearing maps with one or two buttons. POE1 became the antithesis of methodical combat. I'm not saying that makes it a bad game but it is what it is. The direction POE2 is going in is a great one if that meaningful combat appeals to you. |
![]() |
Wanna hear something unholy?
I say, diablo ever was and still is the only arpg that really delivers on the actual combat. Imo that is the reason it is still considered the gold standard. Poe was better in every other aspect. Nothing has changed. Exept the buisness models. |
![]() |
" To make it Souls-like with an isometric perspective would require a massive rework at least 1–2 years of rework. They would have to start from scratch with combat systems, martial arts mechanics, loot, and weapon design. And yeah, I totally agree with you we definitely need to bring back that true power fantasy. |
![]() |
I agree with OP. Just saying your trying to make something like dark souls or Elden ring is all good but to an experienced player there are not many similarities beyond misunderstanding the punishment/reward system of the game. Also it's not a out meaningful combat...or slow progression. That is for new players...if you've been playing souls games for 10+ years then you wreck these games just like blasting through T15 maps. I don't think any boss took me over 3 minutes but most I clear in under a minute with ease if I build my character to do so. If I want a challenge I don't build him up and still wreck shit.
|
![]() |
"The issue with making a comparison to Dark Souls is that it inherently shuts out thinking about how to deal with 1v50 battles. Everything you say is what I get in PoE 2 1v50 battles. The mobs are faster than you, you will die if they get 2 hits in, you need to clear them in 3~4 moves. Not all those moves should be dealing meaningful damage as they're battlefield shaping. - Earthquake/Spearfield to mass slow - Shield Wall/Frost Wall/Glacial Bolt to put up walls - Totem/Minion to guard the flanks - Sunder or some other big windup move to clear the pack "Agreed, that kind of gameplay would be boring. I don't know what people are doing to experience that in PoE 2. |
![]() |
The funny or disturbing part is, they already tried to do that. Ask why did they put movement penalty for heavy armour.
And many peoplke really get kind of a souls like feeling during campaign. Granted, it is fun like this during campaign. But the moment you reach endgame, fun is over. And there is where balancing issues are pointed out. So, you can have both. But what excactly do they want to balance towards? A single player experience? A trade war? A community effort? Dont get it. Dont have fun. |
![]() |
" Can you please source where they said they were trying to do that? |
![]() |
" I see the confusion. They may have never said it explicitly. But world is not black and white. It has always been implied by their design choices. So much so that even Steam categorized POE2 as a souls like game. Now it may or may not be a souls like but i think it is not a complete imagination of people that it draws inspiration from it and that it is likely that POE2 want to imbibe the characteristics that make souls game great. A hard difficulty and fluid and interactive combat system. Last edited by commonsensei#0217 on Apr 27, 2025, 3:08:15 AM
|
![]() |
The biggest problem for me is the lackluster passive skill tree. It doesn't have defenses outside of evasion, ES, block, max resists, and armour (jk, armour doesn't belong here). All these debates people have (whether PoE2 is souls-like or not; that players are playing PoE2 while mobs are playing PoE1; etc.) happen only because players can’t even survive. The passive tree is full of unnecessary noise that masks itself as a "meaningful addition to your build." There are some defensive options that actually work, but they force us all to build the same things over and over again: ES, ES+Eva hybrids, or Life+Block characters. If your character doesn’t belong to any of these categories, you’ll die often. Right now, people tend to overcome this problem by making full glass cannon builds, which just shows how insanely bad the passive tree is. I get it — as a Huntress, for instance, it’s not entirely obvious that you have to travel to the Monk’s area just to build an ES+Eva hybrid.
And I have to be honest: I absolutely despise the current glass cannon meta. And GGG, this is 100% on you. What you did with the passive tree in PoE2 is insanely bad. Oh, and one more thing I noticed in PoE2: the devs make something borderline unusable and bad (like Presence AoE in patch 0.2) and expect you to invest in it just to make it somewhat usable. And this happens despite the passive tree being so artificially stretched. This approach is so obvious — and the fact that it’s so obvious makes it even worse because you feel like you’re being played by the devs. They need to stop. Last edited by grynnder#7112 on Apr 26, 2025, 2:45:29 PM
|
![]() |