Ruthless is way better than bloated normal game, but PLEASE make Ruthless fun to play
" its called ssf (سಥ益ಥ)س (سಥ益ಥ)س (سಥ益ಥ)س (سಥ益ಥ)س (سಥ益ಥ)س (سಥ益ಥ)س (سಥ益ಥ)س
|
![]() |
" At the fan meetup in Summer in Cologne, I talked to Rory (I think it was) and that I also thought that Ruthless was a good idea per se, but that all the points I mentioned earlier in this thread combined made it, well, too Ruthless for me to enjoy. But it is what it is. Seems like there are people who like it as it is, so let them have it. Bird lover of Wraeclast Las estrellas te iluminan - Hoy te sirven de guía Te sientes tan fuerte que piensas - que nadie te puede tocar Last edited by Mikrotherion#4706 on Feb 3, 2024, 1:11:11 PM
|
![]() |
What people keep forgetting is that Ruthless isn't made for everyone to enjoy but a select niche group of players who enjoy extreme item scarcity. I know it's easy to judge based on your personal preferences but it's good to remember that fact
The opposite of knowledge is not illiteracy, but the illusion of knowledge.
|
![]() |
I like Ruthless, but only if you change it drastically so I'll like Ruthless. - OP
|
![]() |
"Ruthless is way better than normal"
"its terrible to play" "huge problems, not fun" huh? Yeah I agree the concept of hiding all support gems and building defining gems which shouldnt even be called supports (ballista totem is not the same as +20 more damage support) is terrible, but thats what Ruthless is. You cant say its better than regular then also terrible. |
![]() |
That's why I don't play it.
I've used hardcore mods in games like Fallout series and Stalker series and those were hard. But ruthless has some arbitrary choices that make no sense to me. This game is an action rpg after all, not a survival game where you need to count your bullets. Play SSF, OP. It's challenging enough without being unfair Last edited by Gordyne#2944 on Feb 3, 2024, 12:54:00 PM
|
![]() |
Just another post of, "I want to say I play something harder and better than you play", that way I can brag. But plz, make it suck less...
|
![]() |
" LOL, that is pretty much how I read the original post too. |
![]() |