0 Min of PoE since 15th May

"

miljan wrote:

If game sold over 1 million copies, if it is after 7 years played every day by more than 1000 people, if the community is big and still active, it is a successful game. You dont even know what a "medocre" game is.

Why can't a game be called "relatively successful" or even "mildly successful" or some other thing?

Why does every game have to either compete with the success of a Blizzard title or else be labeled a failure?

"

CharanJaydemyr wrote:

...And now this thread looks like just another happy cow trudging into the Off-Topic abbatoir.

... And ya know what? I probably should have stayed out of this thread myself. I did for a while, but a few interesting posts were made and before ya knew it...

I think I'll close this tab now, hehe, so I'm not tempted to take part any further.

*Slips a fifty under the table to VG* Nice work.

Seriously, I didn't 'play' the apathy card in return; my lack of reply sufficed.

Let it go. ;)

"

VideoGeemer wrote:

.....

LOL, nice post.

Well thanks to me, and few other people, off we go to off topic thread =D...I think.

"

miljan wrote:

You dont even know what a "medocre" game is.

And this is the part where I tune you out.

I've done game design for years.

"

CharanJaydemyr wrote:

*Slips a fifty under the table to VG* Nice work.

Seriously, I didn't 'play' the apathy card in return; my lack of reply sufficed.

Let it go. ;)

And right before I actually DID close the tab, LOL.

Well, I was planning on letting it go; just wanted to make a point, and no, not because I wanted to kiss your ass (though it may seem to some that I have done a little of that lately, and was concerned it might come off as such a move) and not because I thought it would necessarily do him any good *right now* either.

But ... maybe someday.

"

VideoGeemer wrote:

"

miljan wrote:

If game sold over 1 million copies, if it is after 7 years played every day by more than 1000 people, if the community is big and still active, it is a successful game. You dont even know what a "medocre" game is.

Why can't a game be called "relatively successful" or even "mildly successful" or some other thing?

Why does every game have to either compete with the success of a Blizzard title or else be declared a failure?

It cannot compete with blizzard, because it was not that successful, but saying it was a failure, were obviously it was not is just wrong.

"

AgentDave wrote:

"

miljan wrote:

You dont even know what a "medocre" game is.

And this is the part where I tune you out.

I've done game design for years.

No you didnt.

"

miljan wrote:

"

VideoGeemer wrote:

.....

LOL, nice post.

Well thanks to me, and few other people, off we go to off topic thread =D...I think.

Don't kid yourself, friend. The TOPIC of this thread should have seen it moved to Off-Topic a while back. It's a thinly veiled Diablo 3 topic.

"

miljan wrote:

"

AgentDave wrote:

"

miljan wrote:

You dont even know what a "medocre" game is.

And this is the part where I tune you out.

I've done game design for years.

No you didnt.

Is your memory defective? I already proved this to you (specifically, You, Miljan) once.

Ah well, good job on trolling one more reply out of me. Hope it fills your Troll Hunger for awhile.