The Amulet Problem (Ashes + Omniscience)

"

Senju_Hyoketsu wrote:

So what, game shouldn't cater to and around casuals !

All I'm saying is that there needs to be content people (everyone) aspire to. If everything is too easily attainable, ALL types of players will lose interest.

It's not hard to understand, it's as easy as 1+1 equals 2 actually.

Who put you in charge?

"

Senju_Hyoketsu wrote:

So what, game shouldn't cater to and around casuals !

All I'm saying is that there needs to be content people (everyone) aspire to. If everything is too easily attainable, ALL types of players will lose interest.

It's not hard to understand, it's as easy as 1+1 equals 2 actually.

So the game should cater to you? Your playstyle is the best and only it should get to get the new exciting items?


There needs to be content for people (everyone) that is attainable and not just asperational. What you are saying is 0+1 equals 2 and that just doesnt balance.

"

sidtherat wrote:

no tongue-twisting will change that. these two items are mistakes. changing rarity will make them harder-to-obtain mistakes. it is degenerative design, closing design space and all the rest of game design mistakes.

Then they should be removed for everyone, making mistakes rarer does not make it any less degenerative, it just segregates who gets to have the fun broken items and who is stuck as players that only get the trash.

"

Then they should be removed for everyone, making mistakes rarer does not make it any less degenerative, it just segregates who gets to have the fun broken items and who is stuck as players that only get the trash.

This.