GGG now bans streamers for fake fotoshopped images

"

Exile009 wrote:

"

ArtCrusade wrote:

at the end of the day it's their forum and not ours, even though some forumers would like to believe it's their personal echochamber

Interesting that you imagine that the people arguing for less forum moderation are all seeking to create an echo chamber. Ironic even. Considering how much folks here disagree, less mod action would likely achieve the opposite.

I think you completely missed my point. :)

PoE is sinking boat. Sooner you leave the better

"

coyd wrote:

PoE is sinking boat. Sooner you leave the better

Every single league people call Path of Exile "dead" or "dying" and yet more and more people come and play it. Doesn't sound smart to me.

"

ArtCrusade wrote:

"

coyd wrote:

PoE is sinking boat. Sooner you leave the better

Every single league people call Path of Exile "dead" or "dying" and yet more and more people come and play it. Doesn't sound smart to me.

And if they keep it up, someday they may be right. Not today.

"

coyd wrote:

PoE is sinking boat. Sooner you leave the better

why should i leave? i dont have any stakes in this. seems like i would be inclined to play even more if there is a chance it will be gone in the future

"

iaapvp wrote:

Outrageous!

You sparked a memory of my childhood: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BWy-a1HHhc

"

DiabloImmoral wrote:

They didn't state that in their response to Matth though.

[tinfoilhaton]How do we know the response wasn't faked, dude?[/tinfoilhaton]

"

Leandrysrx8 wrote:

Honnestly, i'm starting to get tired about the hysterical tendencies reddit and this forum are starting to endorse as a way of live.

That probably just means you're growing up. Don't worry about it. It happens to all of us.

The only reason you posted this thread is because you know there are plenty of angry harvest whiners around that will attack ggg for any reason.
In reality pretty much no one cares about this.

Watched the video...

Regardless of truth or not, death threats are serious business, so is trying to hurt someone in retaliation.

I find it very strange that the streamer commited so much time to make a very convoluted response to prove their innocence. As a designer, I can also tell you kerning and pixel allocation on a screen varies from monitor to monitor based on a plethora of variables and that their argument is moot since he's just picking the facts that support what he's selling; bull****.

In the psych of lying, a party usually will attempt to sell you on a lot of misleading facts and have truths to cover up reality or confuse the audience into believing them.

The YouTube video from the streamer actually makes me doubt them more. Feels like an oh fudge, how do I get out of this video.

This has nothing to do with the quality of POE, more over internet ethics, and holding individuals who have influence online accou table.

And in these cases, yes the individual is guilty until proven otherwise. The ban is appropriate to protect the larger community until the underlining issue can be resolved.