Multiboxing rules the world!!! (the world of GGG)
" Yes, and Mitt Romney, George Bush, Rush Limbaugh, and other political monkeys repeated the same thing, but look at how it manages to pierce all reason and sound judgement still -- until it is too late, of course. Your logic sounds like a poor elusion to your own self-defeat. You can't even properly discuss -- let alone write a viable point of satire. You will never see a man faking anger, passion and relentless behavior.
You will always see a man faking love, politeness and respectful behavior. |
|
" Please explain how the economy would remain perfectly balanced, with no inflation and orb prices always constant if multi-boxing was out of the game then.... go ahead, punk, make my day... . |
|
" If there was no RMT, RWT, inflation, manipulation, exploitation, or very little of it, there is a 100% chance that the economy would reflect off of the controlled environment between the players per state of commercing. You will never see a man faking anger, passion and relentless behavior. You will always see a man faking love, politeness and respectful behavior. Last edited by Deceptionist#1813 on Mar 30, 2013, 11:41:42 PM
|
|
" deceptionist: #1 troll today!!! Congratulations :) Looking forward to your performance tomorrow. Well done sir! |
|
" That is not an answer, that is a bunch of semi random words, strung together with no bearing on the topic at hand. Basically people here are saying that multi-boxing causes inflation, I say there would be inflation without multi-boxing because not every orb found is used, therefore over time the pool of orbs increases, therefore things become more expensive in terms of number of orbs per item. People spend vastly different amounts of time on the game, which means that over time people spending more time would add to the effect of inflation because they are finding more orbs and can afford to pay more. If you are complaining about multi-boxers, you have to complain about people that spend more time than you in the game. Same logic. Those are the points you are avoiding addressing. . Last edited by Altadoc#4418 on Mar 30, 2013, 11:48:52 PM
|
|
" No, no. Let me demonstrate this for you better. Any other form of inflation that isn't multi-boxing, RMT, RWT or other corrupted performances, can be equivalent to a man that is very wise and mature about his need for sex, so he patiently waits for a girl, and let's say this man has relationship issues, and ends up having a lot of girls throughout his life... A percentage of those girls have STD's. Multi-boxing can be equivalent to any nymphomaniac who fucks day after day with a different partner. Now tell me which case will contract STD's and spread STD's the most? We aren't talking about how the first case can sum up to the second case in the long-run, because it never will as long as both cases are going at their own pace, while the second case is a thousand times worse than the first case. Regards, Check mate You will never see a man faking anger, passion and relentless behavior. You will always see a man faking love, politeness and respectful behavior. Last edited by Deceptionist#1813 on Mar 31, 2013, 12:00:58 AM
|
|
" It's not cool to say something isn't cool because it's been around longer than you've personally expected it to. That makes you an uncool guy that says things aren't cool - -that doesn't make any logical sense. You will never see a man faking anger, passion and relentless behavior.
You will always see a man faking love, politeness and respectful behavior. |
|
" Completely irrelevant example does not equal check mate. You still have not addressed the issues and I will not be addressing you further until you do, although in any case my points were aimed generally at everyone. Have a wonderful day. . |
|
|
Something is destroying the Default economy. The effects are real. The question is: what's the cause?
I haven't seen one person provide solid evidence that it's multiboxing or multiloading or whatever-the-fuck-you-wanna-call-the-technique. It could be the case, but it's more than a little speculative. I haven't seen one person provide solid evidence that it's not multi-whatever-the-fuck. Actually, proving it isn't seems impossible unless the economy was doing just fine; as long as there's economic destruction, it could be some unknown dudes running all kinds of bots with tons of accounts registered, and there's really no way to prove otherwise. Like vampires and La Chupacabra, no matter how unlikely, you can't really disprove them. However, the inability to disprove a point doesn't mean that the point is worth believing in the first place; evidence is still required, and setting the bar at "look at the economy!" is probably too low to consider ourselves intellectually honest. I think everyone needs to take a step back and think more rationally about this, starting with focusing more on the real issue -- the effects on the economy -- and less on the hypothetical cause du jour. When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted. Last edited by ScrotieMcB#2697 on Mar 31, 2013, 12:15:10 AM
|
|
" Going by this logic: How come the rich stay rich, and the poor remain poor? Regards, Check mate. You will never see a man faking anger, passion and relentless behavior.
You will always see a man faking love, politeness and respectful behavior. |
|
