Hillary Clinton

"

innervation wrote:

@OP - I noticed you put Hillary and "accomplishments" in the same sentence. Could you list a few of her accomplishments that aren't 'getting elected to office' or 'voted for someone else's bill'? Her health care initiative as first lady didn't pass despite dems holding both houses of congress, and her husband being the goddamn president. She introduced next to no legislation of her own while in the Senate, and spent her time as Sec. St. destabilizing the world while profiting immensely via the CGI/Clinton Foundation.

Did you have any particular accomplishments in mind?

"

bwam wrote:

About Not Voting for Hillary Clinton

America is lead by a line of succession: From 1 to 44, we have continued in the proud tradition set forth by the men who founded this country.

The short-term integrity of that succession is at stake--that's what President Obama, and a slew of other respected voices, are saying. "Donald Trump would be a disaster! Protect the integrity of the line of succession!"

This is a short-term view: its focus is on one election.

But it's harder to realize that the system, and how we elect our Presidents, is in jeopardy; and that clinging to short-term safety and stability would allow a deleterious descent of this line of Presidents and their cabinets.

Here's why Bosnia is such an issue to me. Hillary Clinton was caught, clearly, in a lie. And she continued to lie once the truth was unearthed. This was a clear-cut call; there was video, showing that her testimony was false.

What happens when the American people need to rely on the testimony of that same mouth, except speaking from the Office of the President of the United States? In a situation where there isn't a clear video, letting us know for sure what the truth is? How can we trust Hillary Clinton when she habitually lies with seeming impunity?

What message does voting for her send to the parties? That we will stand by a woman whose testimony is false? She lied to us in 2008 while running for this Office. Do you expect, once she gets there, that she will suddenly become honest? And do you expect, that suddenly, after Hillary R. Clinton, the DNC will re-assess how they coronate/nominate their candidates if everyone who opposes Trump swarms to support her?

No. Voting for Hillary Clinton sends the DNC, as well as the RNC, a clear message: That we, the American people, will tolerate being lied to and deceived, and will tolerate these kinds of candidates.

We must protect the long-term integrity of the line and not sacrifice it for the sake of four years.

"

00:01 Telling the truth
00:28 Being in the pocket of Wall Street
00:44 The Clinton Foundation, Saudi Arabia
04:48 Paid speeches for Wall Street
09:40 Housing crisis
10:09 Glass-Steagall Act, banker bailouts
11:26 Wall Street
12:06 Trust
12:50 Gay marriage
15:02 Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)
15:40 NAFTA, conflicts of interest
17:48 Illegal immigration
18:56 Progressive values
19:34 Email server
22:53 Benghazi
27:27 Iraq war
30:06 Patriot Act
30:41 Edward Snowden
31:02 Foreign policy
31:38 Climate change, renewable energy, big oil
34:42 Black Lives Matter
37:12 Fear of black men
37:24 "Super-predators"
39:00 1994 Clinton crime bill, racial prejudice
44:16 Welfare
44:38 Racial wealth gap, deregulation
45:16 Confederate flag controversy
45:42 The Democratic party
45:51 Prison-industrial complex
46:20 Rahm Emanuel
46:46 Bernie Sanders
47:12 Marijuana, criminal justice reform, the drug war
48:03 Attack tactics, healthcare
49:19 Experience
49:29 Walmart, child labor
50:25 No Child Left Behind Act
50:54 Haiti
51:27 Landing under sniper fire
54:02 Council on Foreign Relations
54:48 Children
58:00 Email server, FBI indictment
1:06:38 Guns
1:07:23 Personal wealth, houses
1:08:50 Accountability