PoE 1 Xbox servers are restarting in:
.
They should be back up in approximately .
PoE 1 Sony servers are restarting in:
.
They should be back up in approximately .

The exp HORRID NERF that ruined my gameplay.

"
Snorkle_uk wrote:
"
AceNightfire wrote:
It doesnt make sense to stop the players from reaching level 100. THis is Path of Exile, a game where people tend to make new characters over and over again and try out new stuff. So why not let people reach level 100 normaly and then let them reroll a new character?

I think the exp nerf is unjustified. And I'm saying that as a person who has never leveled a character to lvl 90. My highest is HC Prophecy is 84 now and I already started a new char. But I understand those who go for lvl 100 and there's literally no reason to stop or slow them.



what do you mean 'normally'? If we take normal to mean the amount of time its taken to get to lvl100 historically then its quicker to get to lvl100 now than it has been for the majority of this games life since release.


Well, normaly was the wrong word maybe. What I wanted to say is that GGG should allow players to get to 100 even faster. Look how long it took in Prophecy HC for the first person to reach lvl 100. It took extremely long and those players usually play at least 12+ hours a day (if not more). So it's like impossible for players who do not play that long, which is kinda sad.
"
AceNightfire wrote:

Well, normaly was the wrong word maybe. What I wanted to say is that GGG should allow players to get to 100 even faster. Look how long it took in Prophecy HC for the first person to reach lvl 100. It took extremely long and those players usually play at least 12+ hours a day (if not more). So it's like impossible for players who do not play that long, which is kinda sad.

As I just said in an earlier post : GGG says what the game should or should not be.

PoE has always been like this, and now it's much easier, still the policy remains : PoE has many elements that only veeeeery dedicated player can achieve, level 100 is one of those.
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
"
Fruz wrote:

As I just said in an earlier post : GGG says what the game should or should not be.


Do you actually know what the purpose of a Feedback and Suggestions forum is? It's there for players to actually have an influence on the game and in which direction it will be developed. Ofc GGG has the last word in everything, but saying "GGG says what the game should or should not be" doesn't help anyone at all. There are many developers out there who developed the game in their own way of thinking and lost a huge part of their community because of that. A good developer always considers the thoughts of those who actually play the game (and keep it alive that way).

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info