SET FREE THE ASCENDANCY POINTS (or rework the lab) [New ascension methods/lab rework ideas]

GGG doesn't have a clue as to how many people like or dislike the labyrinth and/or trials.

They haven't asked. The reason they haven't asked is because they don't want to have an official truth out there. They know what the answer will be.

Of course people go into that mess, because it is FORCED upon them.
"
The_Reporter wrote:
GGG doesn't have a clue as to how many people like or dislike the labyrinth and/or trials.

They haven't asked.

Of course people go into that mess, because it is FORCED upon them.

You have no idea what clue they have or not, and people liking or not the lab isn't everything anyway, very far from it.

SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
"
Fruz wrote:
"
The_Reporter wrote:
GGG doesn't have a clue as to how many people like or dislike the labyrinth and/or trials.

They haven't asked.

Of course people go into that mess, because it is FORCED upon them.

You have no idea what clue they have or not, and people liking or not the lab isn't everything anyway, very far from it.



It isn't everything. But it is the point of this thread.
I forgot to answer part of your previous post, mb :
No it isn't completely forced, upon anybody.
GGG are the only one that have data that they can interpret to have an idea if people like the lab or not :
- some people go through the lab without rushing
- some people take the time to get silver keys & caches
- some people take the time to go to annexes and enclosures
- some people run the lab more than once this way, not rushing for enchants, not carrying somebody else


Only GGG can know those things, they are literally the only one that have such figures to interpret.

Of course, one needs to use at least a certain amount of common sense here, to understand what's likely a "The user probably likes it" case and a "The user might only want to rewards", for example.

So they do have something here, where you ( and everybody else here ) have absolutely nothing significant.


And this thread is about "I don't like the lab so I want it changed or I want the points removed from it", not "do people like the lab ???"
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
Last edited by Fruz#6137 on Jan 9, 2017, 12:04:20 AM
Those things STILL don't say what their opinion of the experience is.

I'm sorry, Fruz. you don't have a leg to stand on with this one.
"
The_Reporter wrote:
Those things STILL don't say what their opinion of the experience is.

I'm sorry, Fruz. you don't have a leg to stand on with this one.

They have already more meaning than any of the things that anybody here ( but maybe Turtle, but even the number he has been gathering so far isn't significant enough to do anything imho ) has done so far.

Should we assume than somebody running at a casual pace, getting silver keys, looking for argus / caches and doing it more than once is not having satisfaction out of playing like this, just because you hate the lab and are incredibly stubborn ?
That person obviously does not like what he/she is doing there, right ?

SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
"
Fruz wrote:
"
The_Reporter wrote:
Those things STILL don't say what their opinion of the experience is.

I'm sorry, Fruz. you don't have a leg to stand on with this one.

They have already more meaning than any of the things that anybody here ( but maybe Turtle, but even the number he has been gathering so far isn't significant enough to do anything imho ) has done so far.

Should we assume than somebody running at a casual pace, getting silver keys, looking for argus / caches and doing it more than once is not having satisfaction out of playing like this, just because you hate the lab and are incredibly stubborn ?
That person obviously does not like what he/she is doing there, right ?



I'll say that very few are actually doing it that way. Nearly none. That's part of the reason that GGG has never followed up with their promised lab stats.

Where's your proof that any are?
"
The_Reporter wrote:
I'll say that very few are actually doing it that way. Nearly none.

One other things that you have literally, simply, no clue about.
None.

I am doing it like it sometimes, when I feel like it.
And I am just one single player of a pretty freaking big player base.
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
Last edited by Fruz#6137 on Jan 9, 2017, 12:21:39 AM
"
Fruz wrote:
"
The_Reporter wrote:
I'll say that very few are actually doing it that way. Nearly none.

One other things that you have literally, simply, no clue about.
None.

I am doing it like it sometimes, when I feel like it.
And I am just one single player of a pretty freaking big player base.


So, because you're doing it like that, you assume many others must be?

That's not a lot of proof.

In fact, I'll say that you're the ONLY ONE doing it that way and be just as correct as you are.
It's not like we have never seen post of people liking the lab, or anything right ?

I would ask you to use some common sense, but I think that it's pointless at this point honestly.
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info