Donald Trump
" for sure this is true. Trump is an environmental disaster, hes the most sickening form of rampant capitalist and hes quite backwards on a fair few social issues. Hes an awful person and America should be ashamed of themselves that this is their new president, its a farce, a total farce. That theres reasons to be happy he got in over Hillary is scary, that those 2 were the options? Either way around it was a disaster and a further lunge into the dark for america, we knew that country was fucked, completely lost in bullshit and maybe beyond repair but it would have been a significant new low for them no matter who got in. " because we could move to a different model that is sustainable and ecologically sound. Thats impossible right now but essential for the future of us and our planet. It might be too soon right now but eventually world government is a necessity if we want to take conscious control of our direction as a species. Stop the wars, stop the pollution, stop embracing systems that put awful people like Trump and Clinton in the driving seat, start embracing a system we can actually believe in that has a direction and a purpose, meaning and longevity. I love all you people on the forums, we can disagree but still be friends and respect each other :)
|
![]() |
" Also: " LMAO - my usual response to stuff like this. Last edited by MrSmiley21#1051 on Nov 10, 2016, 7:56:30 AM
|
![]() |
@MrSmiley21 - you know what they say: the more suicides, the less suicidal people out there.
You have to be realistic about these things. Logen Ninefingers Last edited by Bars#2689 on Nov 10, 2016, 7:59:44 AM
| |
" Kinda like how the Obama administration touts low unemployment. People who rage quit the workforce are no longer "unemployed". |
![]() |
" Fake tweet of course. GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
|
![]() |
" Lots of these flying around.
Spoiler
![]() You have to be realistic about these things. Logen Ninefingers Last edited by Bars#2689 on Nov 10, 2016, 8:35:05 AM
| |
" yeah, sure if you wanna fight them, join them ... age and treachery will triumph over youth and skill!
| |
Shoutout to these guys, they helped flip Pennsylvania.
![]() GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
|
![]() |
Yay anti-establishment! Well we will see, because the GOP seems to believe he is going to do the exact same things that GOP has always wanted to do. But you know, he is different and all, we shall see. I am thinking the only difference is going to be that trump is an asshole about things, but the game plan is the same, erode the checks and balances, further erode the ability to vote people out of office, hand the reigns of control over to lobbyists and corporations, erode employee protections, and make working long shifts the requirement to barely scrape by with zero savings. Then pump the stocks, change regulations and dump them enriching the people in the know and sending the country into a free fall again. Erode the publics trust while setting up straw boogie men to burn as a smoke screen while you slip away. Then start up the propaganda machine to fool America all over again, like a worn fiddle. But hey, at least you get to say all the world's problems are inner city black people and muslims with razed homes.
Hey...is this thing on?
|
![]() |
"I was pretty confident Trump would win. Not quite cocky level, so I didn't go around making predictions IIRC. The polling methodology used by mainstream (but not by alternative) meta was skewed towards Clinton. It was no secret, methodology is in the fine print. The process was basically this: 1. Get random people on the phone. 2. Ask if they've voted in the past two consecutive elections. If "no," then not a likely voter, so discard. 3. Ask if Republican or Democrat. This separates data into two distinct data pools stored as percentages. 4. Take Democratic and Republican turnout from 2012. Multiply that Democratic turnout by the Democratic data, and Republican turnout by the Republican data. Since the Democratic turnout was higher in 2012, pollsters call this "oversampling." Now since the Democratic turnout in 2016 could reasonably be assumed to be less than Democratic turnout in 2012, with Republican higher, the alternative right-wing media saw this as some sinister plot to convince the American people that Hillary was much more favored than she actually was. Hence "rigging." But deeply flawed no matter how you slice it. And it truly was rigged. John Podesta instructed pollsters to use that methodology. But the thing which I believe the alternative media and the Clinton campaign got wrong was that this was actually practical. In hindsight, it was probably a very stupid move by the Clinton campaign. It perpetually kept a huge chunk of the country - the Trump supporters - under the illusion that they were huge underdogs and that voter turnout was crucial. That doesn't make it less rigged, we have proof it was, but it was rigged in a foolish manner. This is consistent with Clinton behavior. For example, the email server. Most likely, it was a measure to protect information from being released under FOIA, yet the poor cybersecirity measures taken by Clinton staff made later information public anyway via Wikileaks, sooner than it would have been under FOIA and without redactions to sensitive material. If the Clinton Machine was corrupt and competent, there's no way Trump would have won. If I'm arguing for the former (with good evidence IMHO), then I must accept the absence of the latter. When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted. Last edited by ScrotieMcB#2697 on Nov 10, 2016, 11:34:04 AM
|
![]() |