Donald Trump

So essentially, he'd have to prove they were intending to sabotage his campaign for President. Something as simple as tracking that to a payment would probably suffice.

I thought of that. Problem is the judge or jury if it came to that, would then have to decide if sabotaging a campaign is malicious. Is sabotaging a campaign malicious? Is it personally malicious? They would then explore the meaning of the word malicious, how it should be taken in this case, just wear everyone out.
I know how stupid that sounds but we all know about the shenanigans that go on in court.

Looks like they found those 33k emails Hitlery deleted.

The teenager in me wants to say "REKT!". Ahahahaha!!! I hope they find something that puts that bitch in jail. Hillary for President in 2016? Naw bitch, Hillary for Prison 2016.

The only way she gets out of this is if Obunghole pardons her.

https://twitter.com/KimDotcom

"

kolyaboo wrote:

I thought of that. Problem is the judge or jury if it came to that, would then have to decide if sabotaging a campaign is malicious. Is sabotaging a campaign malicious? Is it personally malicious? They would then explore the meaning of the word malicious, how it should be taken in this case, just wear everyone out.
I know how stupid that sounds but we all know about the shenanigans that go on in court.

While I don't disagree with anything the two of you have said, the original point has been forgotten - why is it bad for the president to sue people for libel? I furthermore agree that he won't win any of the cases. Sam Harris lamented some months (maybe over a year ago) how hard it was to win a libel suit - that he talked to various lawyers about his prospects of winning some, and they basically told him "don't bother even trying". So if Harris, general champion of free speech thinks libel laws are a bit too strict (at least for celebrities), I'd trust it.

That's not to say that I trust Trump's judgement on what is and isn't libel - he has notoriously threatened to sue, or actually sued people like Bill Maher for telling a joke about him. So long as Trump is paying the lawyers, it doesn't concern this citizen.

The link speaks for itself:

http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/

Remember the homeless woman protecting Trump's Hollywood Star? The tolerant left took care of her.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njN75nJdCAk

I saw that!

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

So essentially, he'd have to prove they were intending to sabotage his campaign for President. Something as simple as tracking that to a payment would probably suffice.

Do you really think they are doing a clean direct bank transaction?
They kill anyone behind their back who disobey, and those who cooperate, get probably paid in cash and other ways. These guys leave hardly any obvious trails.

I got a serious question:

What if Trump is elected, and wants to use straight talk during his press meetings,
for example say "fuck" or "god damn".
Then what? The conservative media is going to get their panties in a twist, gasping in outrage...
and?

Is that enough to get him out of office? Everyone will just have to take it.
There's nothing anyone can do but get upset.

That would be the best moment ever, if some reported would ask a stupid question and Trump would just reply, as sworn in president; "shutta fuckup, pls. Next question?"

"

Quantume wrote:

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

So essentially, he'd have to prove they were intending to sabotage his campaign for President. Something as simple as tracking that to a payment would probably suffice.

Do you really think they are doing a clean direct bank transaction?
They kill anyone behind their back who disobey, and those who cooperate, get probably paid in cash and other ways. These guys leave hardly any obvious trails.

Oh, get out of your conspiracy hole. We have actual video of the shady Clinton backroom people, and they're nerds focusing on things like birddogging and ducks. They might try to kill you in the media, but they don't kill people for reals. I mean, unless Chicago had gotten worse, then maybe they would have.

You ever see House of Cards Seasons 1-2? That's more like what politically motivated murders would feel like. They'd be a heck of a lot of effort, way to much to allow them to become a habit. And even that would assume the highest levels of corruption imaginable in our current system.