Trendspotting: POE Playerbase almost halved on Steam alone since the release of Awakening

"

MarcEric wrote:

I guess I'm just done, and I realize I am not the only one.

"

Qarl wrote:

2.0.0 introduced several changes to maps. While many elements have been received well, there have been growing comments about some issues with maps.

We have been looking at what is happening with mapping. We want to know what is working with 2.0.0 and 2.0.1 map changes, and what isn't.

The first thing to note is that we have a lot of data, because there is a lot of mapping happening. Over three million maps are being run each week. We have more players mapping, and more players going past the first tier of maps than we ever have before.
Changes to early maps have been successful. Having introductory map mods has allowed players to interact with rolled maps earlier. More of our player base is mapping, and are continuing to map through to higher map tiers.

Many players have expressed concerns that they hit a wall around level 74 or level 75. The statistics bear this out, and vividly show us there is a problem. There is a serious bump of maps being run at level 73, more than at level 72, and then a solid dive at level 74. This is partially due to level 74 being where the harder mods kick in. The harder mods can be discouraging. However, the shaping of map drops also is a big factor in the divide between 73 and 74.

The problem is much more pronounced in Standard and Warbands than Tempest. The drop rates we have seem to suit the mapping styles of hardcore more, where players are more likely to build up a base of maps, and work up through their maps, rather than always running their highest map.

Around 80% of maps are run in non-hardcore leagues, so we do need to make sure the drop rates fit the dominant styles of play. We will be amending our map drops to smooth the curve into level 74-79 maps.

Maps in the level 80 to 82 range are rarely run relative to other maps. This is intended; these maps are supposed to be dangerous and special, and are also intended to be not sustained in the same way as other maps. Expert players can (and do) maintain 79+ map level runs, but within the range are forced to play a variety of maps. We do also see more hoarding of maps in this level range, where players often choose to not run these maps (we assume until they improve their character).

In summary, we have achieved many goals we set out to achieve - more players are mapping, and finding their way into deeper maps. There are genuine issues that players are feeling, telling us about, and that require changes.

We want to make the bulk of the drop changes in 2.0.2 where we can easily see the results. We will discuss the changes in the 2.0.2 patch notes next week.

"

Raycheetah wrote:

Regarding maps, and current population of PoE, here's a recent Dev Manifesto post by Qarl:

<...>

Somebody is playing 3 million maps a week, so I'd say these numbers are pretty concrete, relative to "Steam charts." After all, the majority of players, as a statistic, are prolly not regular mappers, so, healthy, yeah? =^[.]^=

"

BestUsernameEver wrote:

- A few people don't feel comfortable with such threads and they'll take such topics as some kind of a threat.

"

Disrupted wrote:

Spoiler

and its patch 2.0, not 1.4

"

BestUsernameEver wrote:

The summary and the intermediate status so far:


- The majority of people in this thread want basically the 1.3 version back but including lockstep, loot filters and act 4.

- The majority of people in this thread having much less fun with 2.0 than back with 1.3.

- The majority of people in this thread understand and are able to reproduce that the playerbase shrunk due to the results of the 1.4 patch

- A few people have stated that it's all good as it is.

- Some people are also able to reproduce the player decrease in regard to the latest patch but they'll basically don't care.

- A few people don't feel comfortable with such threads and they'll take such topics as some kind of a threat.

- Particular people say it's absolutely normal to lose theoretically 50% of the playerbase within a month and therfore it doesn't work as an indicator.