"
Sickness wrote:
"
Deccode wrote:
That's exactly what happens in the various links of yours and mine where it doesn't state that the outcomes has to be of equal chance. Yet some mentally challenged beings have still to be taught.
No, they don't state that because they are too busy stating the opposite.
Am no they arent?
|
Posted byDeccode#6112on Feb 14, 2013, 5:56:29 PM
|
"
Deccode wrote:
"
Sickness wrote:
"
Deccode wrote:
That's exactly what happens in the various links of yours and mine where it doesn't state that the outcomes has to be of equal chance. Yet some mentally challenged beings have still to be taught.
No, they don't state that because they are too busy stating the opposite.
Am no they arent?
Purple?
|
Posted bySickness#1007on Feb 14, 2013, 5:58:19 PM
|
"
Sickness wrote:
Brain out of battery?
|
Posted byDeccode#6112on Feb 14, 2013, 6:02:21 PM
|
"
Deccode wrote:
"
Sickness wrote:
Brain out of battery?
I thought you didn't want to continue the discussion, as you didn't reply to my post.
|
Posted bySickness#1007on Feb 14, 2013, 6:05:29 PM
|
|
Wow so the outcome of rolling two six sided dice is not random. Damn I could have just come to these forums and saved the years of blood sweat and tears that I spent on getting an education (that turned out to be mis information).
|
Posted byBlowFish#4051on Feb 14, 2013, 6:09:11 PM
|
"
BlowFish wrote:
Wow so the outcome of rolling two six sided dice is not random. Damn I could have just come to these forums and saved the years of blood sweat and tears that I spent on getting an education (that turned out to be mis information).
ikr good trolling or bad sarcasm
"
Sickness wrote:
"
Deccode wrote:
"
Sickness wrote:
Brain out of battery?
I thought you didn't want to continue the discussion, as you didn't reply to my post.
Brain recharged?
Last edited by Deccode#6112 on Feb 14, 2013, 6:11:35 PM
|
Posted byDeccode#6112on Feb 14, 2013, 6:09:50 PM
|
|
Thanks for TOTALLY DERAILING my post guys...way to go...woot!
Can you take your petty and inconsequential argument about chance and randomness to 4chan where it belongs?
Thanks!
IGN: Kulde
|
Posted byYxalitis#6223on Feb 14, 2013, 6:11:18 PM
|
"
Yxalitis wrote:
Thanks for TOTALLY DERAILING my post guys...way to go...woot!
Can you take your petty and inconsequential argument about chance and randomness to 4chan where it belongs?
Thanks!
No 9 gagers stealing from 4chan.
|
Posted byDeccode#6112on Feb 14, 2013, 6:12:05 PM
|
"
My suggestion for Jewlers/fusings/chromatics is to make the new roll optional. Say you have a 5l armor and want to 6l it. Right now, you need to stockpile hundreds of these orbs to have a fairly safe chance of not screwing yourself over. But what if instead you could accept/decline the new roll. The orb would be consumed regardless of your choice, but you wouldn't be shooting yourself in the foot just by trying to improve your gear. It would still take the same number of orbs on average, but the player would have more incentive to use their orbs, even if they just had a few. Thoughts?
I like this proposal. It actually encourages ppl to gamble and spend the orbs. I'm willing to gamble the orbs, but not the item if it's any good. With the current system, you gamble the item.
|
Posted byMelkrow#0726on Feb 14, 2013, 6:12:27 PM
|
"
Deccode wrote:
Feel free to respond to my post at any time. Until then I don't know what you expect me to do here?
|
Posted bySickness#1007on Feb 14, 2013, 6:12:51 PM
|
