Why is Kripparian not banned??

"
Steinar12 wrote:
lol sitting at home all day exploiting games is not intelligence. more like stupidity cause 1) he's a bum 2) he's gonna eventually be banned just like he was in GW2

lol @ the ppl saying it is beta - you ppl realize that it's basically release right? There are no more wipes, the game is free, the microtransaction store is out.

Basically it's almost as if the devs just said "beta" so if theres any big exploits (like this one kripparian is abusing) or if there are bugs then they fool ppl into getting less mad.


Public advertisements don't happen until release is near. Path of Exile is not really advertising at all; their population is from pure reputation. Everything has an open beta, because hey need a large flux to actually test. If they had the closed beta with that small population, nothing would ever get reported and/or fixed, and there is going to still be crashes during the big influx of players. Tests are done now to have the simultaneous stress of a large population, pushing their optimization abilities to the limits and having a bigger source of reports.

If it was released, they would WANT a lot more people to play. GGG isn't looking into that atm and already have a HUGE population as it is. They will signify this when their ad campaigns initiate.


Furthermore, to clarify, this is in no way an exploit. If you refer to Riot Games and World of Warcraft, a lot of what you would refer as an 'exploit' is just 'clever use of mechanics'. Clever does not necessarily mean it requires wit to perform it, but it's just an altered way of doing things to produce a positive outcome. They end up changing most of it anyway, but they serve no punishment to the player because it was purely the company's fault for having it exposed. Exploiting would be something obviously against code (and written) and the intentional continual use of it. Someone from World of Warcraft got banned from receiving an item named Martin Thunder and using it to clear instances. This happened with another item, but that player reported that he had it, and he served no punishment and was actually given compensation.


With your level of complexity, you may not even read this wall of text I have composed, but any further statements you create that disregard this or any post will be deemed ignorant by the rest of us. Peace.
"
Steinar12 wrote:
"
f3rret wrote:

Also, I was right, you're getting boring.


screw you im not here to entertain you fool.

nobody is forcing you to read or respond to my post so stop acting like it



would you care to actually rebut any of his points you seem to be ignoring them. How is using a mechanic as it was intended an exploit? If anything it just needs to be balanced a little better. Just admit you were wrong and move on, or if you cant do that just move on.
Last edited by derbefrier#6652 on Feb 4, 2013, 9:32:20 PM
"
Steinar12 wrote:
This player is exploiting the SHITE outta the game stun locking bosses so they cannot even attack back.

Such a shame GGG that you are letting 1 man openly exploit and break game mechanics without any punishment.

I say give this guy a lesson GGG and give him the ban stick - give him lesson to not do game exploits like perma stun anymore. He knows it's broken but keeps using it.

Not to mention he admitted on stream that he used d2jsp (the banned trading site). His stash should be empty'ed and distributed to low lvl players.


Regarding the abusing mechanics, we don't want players to be second guessing whether they are allowed to make a character in a specific way.

As the games high level content requires you to be using the mechanics to your advantage, it would be a bad precedent to set banning some uses of mechanics.

If there is an abusable mechanic, like the stun lock, it is on us (the game designers) to make sure it cannot be abused.

If we discover that Kripp is trading Path of Exile items for money, we would ban him based on policy. We won't be banning anyone just because they have a D2JSP account.

"
derbefrier wrote:

would you care to actually rebut any of his points you seem to be ignoring them. How is using a mechanic as it was intended an exploit? If anything it just needs to be balanced a little better. Just admit you were wrong and move on, or if you cant do that just move on.


ok well I am trying to bring attention to this build which needs to be fixed asap. it's not fair that u can perma stun even the BOSS of an entire act so they cannot even fight back.

only reason why i think he should have been banned was to give lesson to him and maybe other ppl thinking of abusing game mechanics like this.

theres no question this stunlock crap needs to be fixed asap though
ok thx for official response i have trust in u devs will handle it ect ect

thx u!
"
Steinar12 wrote:
"
derbefrier wrote:

would you care to actually rebut any of his points you seem to be ignoring them. How is using a mechanic as it was intended an exploit? If anything it just needs to be balanced a little better. Just admit you were wrong and move on, or if you cant do that just move on.


ok well I am trying to bring attention to this build which needs to be fixed asap. it's not fair that u can perma stun even the BOSS of an entire act so they cannot even fight back.

only reason why i think he should have been banned was to give lesson to him and maybe other ppl thinking of abusing game mechanics like this.

theres no question this stunlock crap needs to be fixed asap though


So, everyone who used dual totems and diamond flasks during beta should be banned too? To "set an example"?

Like the guy above you just said, stun is currently working as it was designed to work. If the devs feel this is not working as intended, they will change it.
The whole point of these types of games is finding clever tricks like this to do with the game mechanics, it's why nerds like me like games like these.

C'mon you could at least try to make the discussion interesting.
Closed beta member since: March 19, 2012
whackem wit dat ban stick!
"
Steinar12 wrote:
only reason why i think he should have been banned was to give lesson to him and maybe other ppl thinking of abusing game mechanics like this.


The yellow post just said they wanted nobody to feel like they were abusing because the mechanic was how it worked... Come on now.
the day blizzard removed my diamond armor wizard build was the day i quit diablo3

i shouldnt be punished for thinking out of box and finding out new unique ways to defeat content.
"
species258 wrote:
the day blizzard removed my diamond armor wizard build was the day i quit diablo3

i shouldnt be punished for thinking out of box and finding out new unique ways to defeat content.


I should clarify what I said above. We won't punish players (by banning for example) for doing a build like an auto stun one. That doesn't mean we won't change game elements if that build is clearly over powered.

We almost certainly be making changes to the something related to being able to get full Stun Threshold Reduction.

We will nerf over powered builds, but players shouldn't feel like its somehow against the rules to use and abuse the mechanics of the game.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info