What if legacy leagues had legacy passive trees?
A lot of feedback seems to harp on skill tree changes, especially when previous builds are stymied. What if the legacy leagues allowed you to (optionally) keep your previous tree and layout? Legacy items already exist, would this be much different? Certainly it would please a growing, haranguing minority.
If GGG does not have the technology, fair enough, but if it's possible what objections and concerns exist? I cannot think of any that do not also apply to legacy items. In many ways the same arguments that permit legacy items would justify legacy trees. Then again it's likely apathy is part of GGG's (internal) justification for legacy items and that is a point decidedly against what I am describing. One caveat I have is that characters with legacy trees should not be able to respec without resetting to the new tree. Want to Fix the Economy, Bad Loot, Trade and Legacy PvP? pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/548056
Open Letter to Qarl on Crafting Value pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/805434 Biggest Problem with Mapping: Inconsistent Risk to Reward pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/612507 |
![]() |
Lol, nice try.
3/0 thread |
![]() |
" pls don't divide by 0 Want to Fix the Economy, Bad Loot, Trade and Legacy PvP? pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/548056
Open Letter to Qarl on Crafting Value pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/805434 Biggest Problem with Mapping: Inconsistent Risk to Reward pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/612507 |
![]() |
Quit calling them "legacy leagues".
|
![]() |
Actually they can't, the game right now can only support 1 skill tree.
|
![]() |
" I cannot trade your legacy tree to my orbs. Therefore it is *impossible* for new characters to obtain a legacy tree. For legacy items it is possible for new characters to obtain them by trading, though for some of them, a relatively brief stint of farming may be required to gather the respective orbs. So your proposal would generate an unbridgable gap between players. Not merely wide (as is now the case), but unbridgable. Dear Maligaro, I left my head in San Francisco, I lost my legs in Peru My liver and kidney are on holiday in Sydney And I am sending my Heart to you --- Love, Malachai Last edited by Flapdrol#5373 on Mar 7, 2014, 9:46:21 AM
|
![]() |
I support this idea.
It could help doing this: " E: http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/766266 Selling logs: /view-thread/782113(very high speed) Rhys epic times : view-thread/780247 Last edited by Inexium2#1278 on Mar 7, 2014, 9:42:33 AM
|
![]() |
Sure, everyone in Standard and Hardcore get the Passive tree from Closed Beta. How does that sound to you?
Any more great ideas? “Demons run when a good man goes to war" Last edited by Sneakypaw#3052 on Mar 7, 2014, 9:53:06 AM
|
![]() |
" And only act 1&2, as in closed beta. IGN: Arrows_and_Morality
A man whose errors take ten years to correct is quite a man |
![]() |
You guys have 0 imagination. If tommorow GGG introduced legacy trees you would be all over the forum saying:
"We had legacy uniques, OFC we have now legacy trees, there is no need for a player who chose to keep playing with his char to modify his build again and again and again. ALso it would help GGG since we will not have any more ragequit from players who do not want to accomodate to a new tree" Selling logs: /view-thread/782113(very high speed)
Rhys epic times : view-thread/780247 |
![]() |