Preliminary 0.11.5 Patch Notes

So you wont add damage numbers to the game because it breaks immersion yet people running around with razor footprints is fine?

"

ThePassenger wrote:

- no desync fix
- no fps spikes fix
This game is a time sink anyway.

There is no dysync fix
get a better rig to fix the fps spikes
All games are time sinks

"

MyTeacherTouchesMe wrote:

Thanks for skin transfer! Will it work with any skin? For example could I apply the skin of Shavronne's Wrapping to any body armour I want?

Last time i checked shavs uses the default skin

"

2girlz1cup wrote:

"

MyTeacherTouchesMe wrote:

Thanks for skin transfer! Will it work with any skin? For example could I apply the skin of Shavronne's Wrapping to any body armour I want?

Last time i checked shavs uses the default skin

True but maybe I want to apply the Shavs skin (or regular skin, whatever you prefer) to a regular Vaal Regalia or an armour based body armour.

"

raics wrote:

Ever noticed traps are stronger than most spells and most spells suck as traps or mines? That's because traps were never meant to be spammed.

This. Firetraps base damage is low 4 figure and beartrap base damage is mid 4 figures at endgame level while offensive spells are mid~high 3 figures at best. Unlike the skills that were originally unlimited and ended up with cooldowns due to poor balancing, traps have always had cooldowns and arent balanced when they can be cast constantly like spells. The cooldown fix is for the best.

As for enduring cry, well, there was probably a better way to balance it than by giving it a cooldown in the first place, but otoh its a decent stopgap to prevent permanent physical immunity with minimal investement.

I am ready for skin swap. (assuming 3d art will look like the tooltip when they implement it)

"

LimitedRooster wrote:

"

Chris wrote:

I believe the armour types are cross-compatible. There's a lot of internal discussion about the merits of this.

Pros: You can actually use the art from some of the hybrid gear. Some of which look very good, but are often awful min/max wise.

Cons: None. Nobody has time to look at what your character looks like in PvP. And the monsters certainly don't care about my fashion faux-pas.

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

"

Glutton wrote:

Well, that's just, like, you're opinion, man.

It's objective as it gets don't besmirch reality with the foul snarlword grease of "opinion."

The monsters are just little 2d images on our monitor screens. They don't have feelings. Scientific Fact. Ded srs.

Love the Cyclone effect :)

"

EKTELESTES wrote:

The only thing you can actually do if they finally go through with the gem instance..is to take the +1 trap passive in order to have 4 traps with 1 gem.

However...4 vs 6 ( or 8 )....doesn't really cut it.

Imho it's a very bad decision.

thats not accurate mate sadly, it means u can plant 4 traps, not that u get 4 traps in stock. shitty i know, it should do both. what good is being able to plant 4 traps if we can only store 3? with the original cd of 8 seconds its pretty stupid if you have 1 trap and can throw down 4 but store 3. what good is throwing down upto 4 traps when 80% of the time your throwing it directly at an enemy anyway?

GGG please fix "Number of Traps Allowed" node to "Number of storable traps", it's just not useful! especially with this new single gem update.