Climate Change... Pass this along. "It's a hoax."

If you're a scientist you know climate change is bullshit. The only reason a scientist doesn't come out and say it's bullshit is because he/she is afraid to end up like Darwin when he was new in the scene. People need to understand time doesn't exist, just because you see a clock on the wall doesn't mean time is relevant.



Animals aren't being extinct because of climate change it's because we are butchering them, eating them... Climate change is HUGE HUGE HUGE money. The majority of non profit organizations helping to improve climate change is bullshit.



Take something as simple as a typical aquarium in a household, best example mollies. If you add salt water to the mix mollies adapt. One of the very few species of fish that can survive when their environment changes. You know landfills are big money, everything is currently able to deteriorate. Let's take plastic for example. The only reason plastic is everywhere is because no one has yet to find a profitable way to get rid of it.

Put a plastic bottle in the microwave... Omg it's starting to deteriorate.

Someone told me once that she drives an electric car to help the earth. I told her do you know what it takes to produce that battery? Do you know what happens to the battery once it time is up? It just fucking boggles my mind how people are fucking idiots sometimes.

These reality shows, the media... Have destroyed the human brain. People immediately connect with dramatization. Put a fucking polar bear tripping on a piece of ice with some fucking sad Enya song in the background, bam... "Oh no the ice is melting save the polar bears."



I'm really curious how many of you have been brainwashed...

"

solwitch wrote:

People need to understand time doesn't exist, just because you see a clock on the wall doesn't mean time is relevant.

that's deep man

Eugenics was the scientific consensus at one time.. just sayin

Ever notice scientist dont need malpractice insurance while contractors lawyers and doctors do? Why not is what i'd like to know. Probably because they are talking shit like a bum outside a bar and no one should care.

"

morbo wrote:

The Sad Truth About The Paris Climate Accord

Stefan Molyneux is a typical righty propagandist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiZlBspV2-M

It's funny that a bunch of ditch diggers think they know more then actual scientist because its got to be a huge global conspiracy. The Idea that science got something wrong once and shouldn't be believed is terrible logic. The right is the party that constantly puts crazy people like Michele Bachman on the science committee. It's no wonder the largest backers of conservatives is oil and energy company's. I'm sure the guy on youtube who doesn't even understand the basic's figured it all out...

"

Aim_Deep wrote:

Eugenics was the scientific consensus at one time.. just sayin

Ever notice scientist dont need malpractice insurance while contractors lawyers and doctors do? Why not is what i'd like to know. Probably because they are talking shit like a bum outside a bar and no one should care.

Let's be clear on definitions here. Eugenics is defined as "the science of improving a human population by controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristics." (credit: google) There are variations and usage differences but this is more or less correct. Nobody can seriously argue against the principle's accuracy but there are some obvious moral problems with how people have used this idea. The term became sort of a buzzword because of it being used as a justification for racism and forced sterilization, among other things. Eugenics is still a thing but people use different terms like genetic counseling, egg and sperm donation, abortion of disabled fetuses, etc.

For the second part, scientists do need insurance if they act in an advisory capacity as independent contractors or advisers. People who are just publishing papers or doing research under someone else don't require this obviously because they are not advising anyone or performing procedures on people.

"

DurianMcgregor wrote:

The term became sort of a buzzword because of it being used as a justification for racism and forced sterilization, among other things.

Yup, I've never heard of a scientific consensus that being Jewish is an "undesirable heritable characteristic," as per Durian's citation of Google

"

SnowCrash wrote:

The Idea that science got something wrong once and shouldn't be believed is terrible logic.

They got a lot wrong, not just once. I was a believer in the climate catastrophe in the times of Al Gore and his doomsday scenario "documentary". Ofc to combat the melting ice caps, the government needs more money from you.

The thing is that UN is a corrupt den of globalist elites and the "carbon taxes" will be paid by the end consumers & the little people of this world, as always.

E:
In that video Stefan is not disputing climate change or environmental impact of humanity, as much as he's disputing how inefficient these accords will be and who will carry the price.

and yet, even as a "little people" that will have to pay to make sure there's a future on this planet, I find that scenario preferable to the one where I keep more money in my pockets but doom the planet.