Hillary Clinton

Seriously, what a bunch of weirdos sending mails.

So, Hillary and the entire MSM, plus the semi-closet members of #NeverTrump GOP are drooling over Trump's hot mic moment of eleven years ago, to the point where the hurricane coverage has faded to background noise.

Here's a famous cartoonist's take on it:

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/151504993671/why-does-this-happen-on-my-vacation-the-trump

"

I assume that publication of this recording was okayed by the Clinton campaign. And if not, the public will assume so anyway. That opens the door for Trump to attack in a proportionate way. No more mister-nice-guy. Gloves are off. Nothing is out of bounds. It is fair to assume that Bill and Hillary are about to experience the worst weeks of their lives.

"

Clinton supporters hated Trump before this latest outrage. Trump supporters already assumed he was like this. Independents probably assumed it too. Before you make assumptions about how this changes the election, see if anyone you know changes their vote because of it. All I have seen so far is people laughing about it.

Trump's statement is measured and humble, and also reflects the accuracy of Adams' prediction:

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/07/donald-trump-releases-statement-following-release-2005-lewd-audio/

Everything Trump touches turns to GOLD. =^[.]^=

Poltifact a shit as usual :^)

"

Xavderion wrote:

Poltifact a shit as usual :^)

I may just steal that, Xav! =^[.]^=

Regardless of how do you feel about open borders (I think they are bad idea currently, maybe in a few centuries, although I do favor reducing redtaping for migration), what she does proposes and what she dreams are different things.

"

NeroNoah wrote:

Regardless of how do you feel about open borders (I think they are bad idea currently, maybe in a few centuries, although I do favor reducing redtaping for migration), what she does proposes and what she dreams are different things.

The problem Hillary can't outrun is that she has a history. In this case, her "private" position is what she takes action on, not her stated position. Once she decides what she wants, she goes after it doggedly.

This tenacity would be a good trait if her goals weren't entirely self serving, and she didn't think of human lives like so much toilet paper. Isis will look like girl scouts if Hillary gets her way.

I don't know if Assange is blissfully unaware of how mail in voting works in the United States, but he's got a 2-4 day window before the public perception wouldn't hit until most ballots were already sent out.

If he thinks he is going to "time it just right" Hillary will get elected and there will be a "drone malfunction". We already know she's willing to sacrifice embassies to further her own goals.

What nations will be next for Hillary's "Spring" cleaning destabilization program?

In cartoons we trust.

That is how I feel.

May your pants forever be crisp and snug and ooooh so comfortable, such that you regret having to remove them in the evening,
-Pants

EDIT! DalaiLama, didn't you hear though? She thinks very highly of children.

CanHasPantsuit

"

DalaiLama wrote:

If he thinks he is going to "time it just right" Hillary will get elected and there will be a "drone malfunction". We already know she's willing to sacrifice embassies to further her own goals.

Good lord. A drone. In the middle of London. That's so fucking stupid. Bond villain stupid. Don't bring that "source" either.

"

NeroNoah wrote:

"

DalaiLama wrote:

If he thinks he is going to "time it just right" Hillary will get elected and there will be a "drone malfunction". We already know she's willing to sacrifice embassies to further her own goals.

Good lord. A drone. In the middle of London. That's so fucking stupid. Bond villain stupid. Don't bring that "source" either.

Drone, gas leak explosion, inside person, etc.

Murders are always motive and opportunity. The motive is there, the opportunity is just how much plausibility does Hillary want the being able to deny the hit.

We've already seen that she is willing to run roughshod over rules and regulations, and that deaths mean absolutely nothing to her.

She might just blame the Russians. She could easily arrange an international pardon, make him think he is free and whack him later.

The killing part isn't tough at all. It's just potential political blowback.