"
I an inclined to interpret Mark's "Yes" as literal as possible, meaning: it's one, or it's the other. So no, according to Mark.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_disjunction
"
"A or B" is true if A is true, or if B is true, or if both A and B are true.
While the English language can be ambiguous with regard to inclusiveness of 'or', in gerneral programmers, mathematicians, and others trained in formal logic will be specific when they want to say 'A or B, but not both' (at least in cases where it matters).
|
Posted byMark_GGGon May 5, 2016, 10:20:54 PMGrinding Gear Games
|
"
"
I an inclined to interpret Mark's "Yes" as literal as possible, meaning: it's one, or it's the other. So no, according to Mark.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_disjunction
"
"A or B" is true if A is true, or if B is true, or if both A and B are true.
While the English language can be ambiguous with regard to inclusiveness of 'or', in gerneral programmers, mathematicians, and others trained in formal logic will be specific when they want to say 'A or B, but not both' (at least in cases where it matters).
Formal logic and Art are like water and oil
Don't forget to drink your milk 👌
|
Posted byTheWretchon May 5, 2016, 10:29:36 PM
|
"
"
"
I an inclined to interpret Mark's "Yes" as literal as possible, meaning: it's one, or it's the other. So no, according to Mark.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_disjunction
"
"A or B" is true if A is true, or if B is true, or if both A and B are true.
While the English language can be ambiguous with regard to inclusiveness of 'or', in gerneral programmers, mathematicians, and others trained in formal logic will be specific when they want to say 'A or B, but not both' (at least in cases where it matters).
Formal logic and Art are like water and oil
Pure mathematics strongly disagrees.
|
Posted byGeorgAnatolyon May 5, 2016, 10:35:04 PM
|
"
"
I an inclined to interpret Mark's "Yes" as literal as possible, meaning: it's one, or it's the other. So no, according to Mark.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_disjunction
"
"A or B" is true if A is true, or if B is true, or if both A and B are true.
While the English language can be ambiguous with regard to inclusiveness of 'or', in gerneral programmers, mathematicians, and others trained in formal logic will be specific when they want to say 'A or B, but not both' (at least in cases where it matters).
Well in any case, my experience in programming - specifically, lower-level programming courses at university - tells me there are plenty of games which are never sold and are utter lifeless uninspired shit. Therefore the "or" is not satisfied and the statement is false.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted. Last edited by ScrotieMcB on May 5, 2016, 10:45:54 PM
|
Posted byScrotieMcBon May 5, 2016, 10:45:24 PM
|
"
I admit that stuff is way over my head, maybe youre right
Don't forget to drink your milk 👌
|
Posted byTheWretchon May 5, 2016, 10:45:57 PM
|
"
"
I admit that stuff is way over my head, maybe youre right
If you need something you can look at, try this:
https://www.google.de/search?q=beautiful+fractals&hl=en&tbm=isch
Some of them are very common in nature though, so maybe not that "pure", even though they can easily be derived from a completely theoretical standpoint.
Remove Horticrafting station storage limit.
|
Posted byChar1983on May 5, 2016, 10:55:25 PM
|
"
"
"
I an inclined to interpret Mark's "Yes" as literal as possible, meaning: it's one, or it's the other. So no, according to Mark.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_disjunction
"
"A or B" is true if A is true, or if B is true, or if both A and B are true.
While the English language can be ambiguous with regard to inclusiveness of 'or', in gerneral programmers, mathematicians, and others trained in formal logic will be specific when they want to say 'A or B, but not both' (at least in cases where it matters).
Well in any case, my experience in programming - specifically, lower-level programming courses at university - tells me there are plenty of games which are never sold and are utter lifeless uninspired shit. Therefore the "or" is not satisfied and the statement is false.
You don't have to sell something for it to be a product. You merely have to produce it.
Likewise, art can be lifeless or uninspired and still be art.
Both of these categories have exceptionally low barriers to entry.
Gameplay & Level Design
Need help? Contact support@grindinggear.com
|
Posted byDan_GGGon May 5, 2016, 11:46:11 PMGrinding Gear Games
|
|
I love this stuff, im really enjoying hearing everyone's point of view on this topic
Don't forget to drink your milk 👌
|
Posted byTheWretchon May 6, 2016, 1:21:50 AM
|
"
You don't have to sell something for it to be a product. You merely have to produce it.
Likewise, art can be lifeless or uninspired and still be art.
Both of these categories have exceptionally low barriers to entry.
the artist Marcel Duchamp has put a urinal in an art show before and called it ready-made art. there are no limits in art.
|
Posted bypandasplayingon May 6, 2016, 1:47:10 AM
|
|
I decide to post my opinion earlier today regarding the OP's view of the problem. Come back to a metaphysical debate that (somewhat) relates to the OP. Stay... you forum community. Stay you...
"It's all clearer now
And I hear her now
And I'm nearer to
The Salvation Code"
|
Posted byPleiadesBlackstaron May 6, 2016, 2:05:06 AM
|
