What body type do you prefer in a man/would you want to have?

"

VaultzInex wrote:

Looks like nature or the thing who creates plagues* is homophobic lol.

"

VaultzInex wrote:

Nobody it talking about gay women.

"

VaultzInex wrote:

Like non verified theories and stuff? Yeah evolution etc..

"

VaultzInex wrote:

But something is TRUE, no internal controversy about it:
"..in the very population in which it first appeared — gay men"

Where the "fuck"(oh, the irony) it was before? Did it appear, just like that? Just to mess up with this population?

Where was the VIH before it first appeared(in gay men poulation)?

Where... ?

"

AIDS is caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which originated in non-human primates in Sub-Saharan Africa and was transferred to humans during the late 19th or early 20th century.

( snip )

According to the natural transfer theory (also called 'Hunter Theory' or 'Bushmeat Theory'), the "simplest and most plausible explanation for the cross-species transmission" of SIV or HIV (post mutation), the virus was transmitted from an ape or monkey to a human when a hunter or bushmeat vendor/handler was bitten or cut while hunting or butchering the animal. The resulting exposure to blood or other bodily fluids of the animal can result in SIV infection.

"

Upandatem wrote:

That's almost funny what you just wrote.

I don't really believe that you can ever prove anything to a 100% certainty, simply because no matter how well you think a given model describes an event of any kind, problems may be discovered at a later date wich forces one to reconsider.

If it happened to Newton and his law of gravity, it can happen to anyone.

However, I do believe you can disprove something to a 100% certainty.

As for the claim that nature is a man-hating (because homosexual women gets the special treatment) homophobe, the main reason you can safely discard this notion as utter garbage is that there is a much better, more probable explanation, one that not only is considerably less absurd but also explains the collateral damage*.

This is it folks, better hold on to something!

Coincidence™

*

I use the term "collateral damage" only because if all this really was some entity's way to reduce the population of male homosexuals, non-male homosexuals like lesbian females and straights of either gender would have to be considered as such.

Of course, it goes without saying that any such entity would have to be considered moraly bankrupt and worthy only of contempt.

Regarding the topic of wether evolution is a real thing or not, consider that without evolution in effect, you would be a 100% identical copy of your parents. Both of them. You have fun with that.

The very fact that somewhere between the two of them and you a change occured that let you be somewhat different to them, however slightly, that is evolution, as it affects us humans in real time.

For something with a much, much faster generational cycle (like microbes) relatively big changes can occur in a relatively short amount of time. Wich is why we have problems with things like mutating viruses pulling shenanigans on our immune systems and bacteria suddenly becoming impervious to various types of antibiotics.

edit:

"

Upandatem wrote:

I don't really believe that you can ever prove anything to a 100% certainty

To clarify, when a scientificly literate person claims something is proven, what they mean is that it is simply proven to not be wrong within the context. There's a subtle, but important difference.

Unwarranted Bonus Info, "proven" in the context of particle physics means 99,99997% probability. A sure bet by any reasonable standards, but no 100%.