Fair on not Fair?

Answer: Fair.

I'd ban you just for that grammar. God it was painful to read.

"

kazzle99 wrote:

I'd ban you just for that grammar. God it was painful to read.

Not everyone native language is English.

Just to be sure: AFAIK, a macro that joins a random trade chat (for instance on F11) and a macro that posts a predefined message to said trade chat (for instance on F12) are allowed, as long as the two actions require pressing two separate keys rather than one. Am I right?

"

ReZar wrote:

"

kazzle99 wrote:

I'd ban you just for that grammar. God it was painful to read.

Not everyone native language is English.

The writing 'style' of the OP isn't ESL. It's intentionally misspelling words to look cute. Ignorance is the new cute.

"

fph wrote:

Just to be sure: AFAIK, a macro that joins a random trade chat (for instance on F11) and a macro that posts a predefined message to said trade chat (for instance on F12) are allowed, as long as the two actions require pressing two separate keys rather than one. Am I right?

nope

"

Wiseman wrote:

"

fph wrote:

Just to be sure: AFAIK, a macro that joins a random trade chat (for instance on F11) and a macro that posts a predefined message to said trade chat (for instance on F12) are allowed, as long as the two actions require pressing two separate keys rather than one. Am I right?

nope

say you have trade channels 1 through 12 bound on your F1-12 keys, and your message on another button, you can just hit f1 key f2 key f3 key, that is allowed, one action per action.

I remember reading that /oos /itemlevel and logout are allowed. It's the ones used on a timer that are ban worthy. I dont know about trade spam, but I would say good, ban those annoying people.

I think there is something the OP didn't tell us.

NOT FAIR!!!!!1111

OP is a botter.

He tells us he was the subject of a three day ban. He states:

"

I am banned on my account and after 3day's i am unbaned ( say's system was wrong ) then i send massage to GGG is it alowed use macro since som top playeds using it and after 2-3 hours after that quesions this is result

Now, I won't try to deny OP's statement that he sent an email with questions about the use of macros. I will call into question the correlation between asking about use of macros and a permanent account ban. More likely than not, the OP received the email he quotes not as a reply to his question, but as notification from support about their action.

I'm guessing that the anti-bot system automatically applied the three day ban, allowing support time to investigate and "flag" the account to check for other suspicious activity in the future. Once the temporary ban was lifted, OP fired up the bot program and set the wheels in motion for the permanent account ban.

If I were GGG, and I wanted foolish botters to expose themselves, I would send out emails to those caught by my system that their temp bans were "system error" as well. Hubris is a female dog.