I'll be playing both for sure
|
Posted byFireycold188#4781on Sep 18, 2011, 8:16:33 PM
|
I will surelly play both. These kind of games must be played. After finishing the campaign i can decide which of to play more.
|
Posted byfeliperage#7702on Sep 18, 2011, 8:57:18 PM
|
I plan on playing D3 but I will give some time to this game just incase
|
Posted bytre#1949on Sep 18, 2011, 11:18:47 PM
|
just PoE
|
Posted byPatros#5011on Sep 18, 2011, 11:21:26 PM
|
I will try both and then choose the best !
Diablo 3 has got RM Auction House that I dislike, but it seems very fun too.
Just have to wait a beta key for both in order to find which is the best !
|
Posted byokami29#7533on Sep 19, 2011, 9:08:31 AM
|
"
Tamaranis wrote:
"
Tamaranis wrote:
Let's be honest here: Diablo 3 is going to be awesome.
There are a lot of complaints that it's be "wow-ified" or that it's too "mainstream" or "dumbed-down." Upon examination, trying to compare these complaints to the game, they are incoherent. Only when they are held against the motivation of the complainer do they make sense: People think that if they say they want to play a big-budget game like Diablo 3 they won't seem like special little snowflakes.
These people are full of shit and most of them are going to buy Diablo 3.
Path of Exile is going to be a different game than Diablo 3. It's in the same genre, but your character development and the gameplay are going to feel different, and I really want to give it a try.
"
PriestinPD wrote:
I have a mission to ask of you. Name me 5 similarities between Diablo 3 and 2.
Classic. The supposedly unanswerable rhetorical question. Delivered with a confidence borne of not having bothered to consider it before asking.
-Direct continuation of storyline of Diablo 2
-Reappearance of familiar monsters and villains
-Game still involves wandering around randomly generated dungeons and killing all the monsters in them.
-Still has a focus on collecting the treasure that falls out of said monsters when they are slain
-Still presents a sense of a humanity besieged by and powerless before an insidious evil power (This final point remains true regardless of how much energy you devoted to whining that it isn't.)
"
PriestinPD wrote:
While you do that let me give you some of my gripes with the game. Auto-sorting stat system.
Diablo 2 was a long time ago and that's not a popular system today. But for all the complaints about Diablo 3 being WoW, one thing WoW has taught us is that auto-assigned stats doesn't mean no decisions regarding- or control over- stats.
Anyway, if you're going to obsess on tradition, the current arrangement is quite similar to the original Diablo game, which notionally had a system for stat point distribution, but by endgame resulted in characters with a fixed array of base stats determined by their character class.
"
PriestinPD wrote:
If there's a popular online game with an economy, there's a cash shop. Unavoidable consequence of the day and age. All Blizzard's done is admit it. There was one in Diablo 2. Perhaps you ignored it, then. You won't have any problem continuing to do so in Diablo 3.
"
PriestinPD wrote:
Items that make the game simpler i.e Cauldron of Jordan, the Recall Stone, and the Nephillim Cube.
They make the game faster, not easier. The lack of those features in Diablo 2 did not make the game harder, they made it slightly more tedious than it needed to be. There was nothing difficult or intelligent about filling your tome of town-portal or making a town-run to sell the high-gold low-utility items you'd picked up, it just added downtime.
These things weren't features, they were minor oversights Blizzard could afford to make because they were chucking Diablo 2 into a competition vacuum.
They got replicated through the genre, of course, in a manner similar to what happens when the lead car drives off the road in a snow storm.
"
PriestinPD wrote:
And skills are automaticly obtained upon leveling up, no more "trap sins" or "singing barbs" or whatever.
Hardly. Sure, you get all 20 skills, but each one of them can be further developed in 1 of 5 ways. It's not that there's 20 skills and you get all of them. It's that there's 100 skills and you get 20 of them. That's enough skills to easily remain a generalist if you want to, or you could focus on a more specific role.
"
PriestinPD wrote:
It's not Diablo anymore. Its a cashgrab.
Ah, Blizzard's been operating as a non-profit up 'till this point, yeah?
I do believe you put him in place. Kudos.
[img]http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b103/awpsaint/xenicide.jpg[/img]
|
Posted byXenicide#3791on Sep 19, 2011, 10:00:57 AM
|
ofc will b playing d3, maybe both games, but certainly d3, ive been playing d2 for 10 years non-stop. CAN...NOT..WAIT..
|
Posted byKEKZOJ#1702on Sep 19, 2011, 11:08:13 AM
|
"
Coops147 wrote:
Suddenly a swarm of Mexicans surround Coops147, lifting above them their new hero and cheering in delight at the revolutionary thought of having both hard and soft-shelled taco's
I'll probably play PoE or Torchlight 2. All this DRM and cash shop business in Diablo3 bodes ill, though I should be careful to judge before it's released.
It's a risky move, though. Time will tell, I suppose.
Last edited by midnightmare#5172 on Sep 20, 2011, 7:39:32 AM
|
Posted bymidnightmare#5172on Sep 20, 2011, 7:38:56 AM
|
In my case, both. I have two friends that are really awaiting D3 and won't look at or consider another game like it (i tried to show them torchlight 2 for example)
So i'll play d3 with them and when they hop off d3 or the days they aren't on it i'll be playing PoE ^.^
Be like my WoW days all over again with raids<->alts x_X lol
Both games for me though. who ever said a person can have too much dungeon crawling/hack'n slashing fun? :P
|
Posted byFateReich#1358on Sep 20, 2011, 9:37:06 AM
|
More like ... stick with diablo 3? Or should I wait for PoE?
|
Posted byKaffien#3580on Sep 20, 2011, 2:06:38 PM
|