"
pneuma wrote:
"
Nephalim wrote:
No downside chaos->ES?
RF was broken. Zealot's Oath is broken. Shav's is broken (even after the slight ES reduction). The three together was an unholy marriage of OP bullshit of a level not seen since Diamond Flask dominance.
The RF change also did not affect how incredibly strong Blood Rage is with Shav's or how it single-handedly allows for powerful low life builds with no downside (that get a free aura).
So... no. I respectfully disagree. That it propped up casters for such a long time is a separate issue.
These builds require significant gear investment, and are still, imo, very squishy, despite all the dps.
Why are people so mad at builds they dont have / cant afford? Never understood it
|
Posted byjsn006#2582on Dec 9, 2013, 3:33:22 AMBanned
|
"
jsn006 wrote:
Why are people so mad at builds they dont have / cant afford? Never understood it

|
Posted bypneuma#0134on Dec 9, 2013, 3:53:45 AMAlpha Member
|
I do remember there will be a "chaos dmg can't pass ES" item coming, but i don't think it will be this.
In the future yes.
|
Posted byjamesho2013#2566on Dec 9, 2013, 5:19:31 AM
|
"
pneuma wrote:
"
jsn006 wrote:
Why are people so mad at builds they dont have / cant afford? Never understood it
I dont get the joke.
And if you close your eyes, does it feel like your exalt almost hit this time~
|
Posted byEternallight#2338on Dec 9, 2013, 5:20:23 AM
|
The ring is OP, since it is not a chest piece. Which was the biggest downside of shavs. Being unable to equip the biggest ES piece for any ES user.
This ring would negate that fact and gives a downside that already needs to be countered by ES users even if they don't equip this ring.(status ailments) Resulting in no downside whatsoever for a massive boost.
Since there is no downside to the ring, it will not happen.
Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes
|
Posted byBoem#2861on Dec 9, 2013, 5:27:53 AMOn Probation
|
"
Sexcalibure wrote:
"
danisonxtc wrote:
stop dreaming about op uniques... this would even beat shavs since you can run your 1k es chest ololol
How would this be OP?
if you dont know why this ring would totally break the game, i cant help you....
"Path of nurfs" - LVL 100 + LVL 100 + LVL 100 ENDGAME REAVER
"1.3.0 Path of nurfs 3. expansion"
Shops: 1031762,774343,883462,371756,1091096,1099789,1260674
Reaver Videos: https://www.youtube.com/user/velo1337/videos
|
Posted bydanisonxtc#0218on Dec 9, 2013, 5:59:19 AM
|
"
Boem wrote:
The ring is OP, since it is not a chest piece. Which was the biggest downside of shavs. Being unable to equip the biggest ES piece for any ES user.
This ring would negate that fact and gives a downside that already needs to be countered by ES users even if they don't equip this ring.(status ailments) Resulting in no downside whatsoever for a massive boost.
Since there is no downside to the ring, it will not happen.
Im wont feed you, go back under the bridge
ZiggyD is the Labyrinth of streamers, some like it, some dont, but GGG will make sure to push it down ur throat to make you like it
|
Posted bySexcalibure#7575on Dec 9, 2013, 7:54:22 AMOn Probation
|
"
Im wont feed you, go back under the bridge
First off lose the M it has no need in that sentence.
Secondly my point is solid. there is a reason why shavronnes is on a chest item piece. Think about it.
Thirdly, if that is your way of responding to a logical comment as to why your item idea won't be allowed by GGG, then seriously grow up.
My points are valid and still stand even if you disregard them, GGG won't.
I expected more from you, but maybe i shouldn't have. I will refrain from posting to your topic's any further since you have no desire for opinion's ore fact's, but just want to hear.
"Fuck yeah bro OP item piece, GGG should totaly forfeit on balancing the game and put that in."
Good day to you sir. Sorry if my post seems harsh/unfair, this was not my intent.
Edit : if it was an amulet based item, denying the user of equipping chayula's and forcing him to get unwavering stance, it might be considered. that's all i will ad to this thread.
Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes Last edited by Boem#2861 on Dec 9, 2013, 8:09:59 AM
|
Posted byBoem#2861on Dec 9, 2013, 8:08:37 AMOn Probation
|
"
Boem wrote:
"
Im wont feed you, go back under the bridge
First off lose the M it has no need in that sentence.
Secondly my point is solid. there is a reason why shavronnes is on a chest item piece. Think about it.
Thirdly, if that is your way of responding to a logical comment as to why your item idea won't be allowed by GGG, then seriously grow up.
My points are valid and still stand even if you disregard them, GGG won't.
I expected more from you, but maybe i shouldn't have. I will refrain from posting to your topic's any further since you have no desire for opinion's ore fact's, but just want to hear.
"Fuck yeah bro OP item piece, GGG should totaly forfeit on balancing the game and put that in."
Good day to you sir. Sorry if my post seems harsh/unfair, this was not my intent.
Edit : if it was an amulet based item, denying the user of equipping chayula's and forcing him to get unwavering stance, it might be considered. that's all i will ad to this thread.
Dude you said no downside...
Stunned when hit by chaos
And
Doubles chaos damage you take...
Youre right those are buff
ZiggyD is the Labyrinth of streamers, some like it, some dont, but GGG will make sure to push it down ur throat to make you like it
|
Posted bySexcalibure#7575on Dec 9, 2013, 8:56:09 AMOn Probation
|
"
Sexcalibure wrote:
"
Boem wrote:
"
Im wont feed you, go back under the bridge
First off lose the M it has no need in that sentence.
Secondly my point is solid. there is a reason why shavronnes is on a chest item piece. Think about it.
Thirdly, if that is your way of responding to a logical comment as to why your item idea won't be allowed by GGG, then seriously grow up.
My points are valid and still stand even if you disregard them, GGG won't.
I expected more from you, but maybe i shouldn't have. I will refrain from posting to your topic's any further since you have no desire for opinion's ore fact's, but just want to hear.
"Fuck yeah bro OP item piece, GGG should totaly forfeit on balancing the game and put that in."
Good day to you sir. Sorry if my post seems harsh/unfair, this was not my intent.
Edit : if it was an amulet based item, denying the user of equipping chayula's and forcing him to get unwavering stance, it might be considered. that's all i will ad to this thread.
Dude you said no downside...
Stunned when hit by chaos
And
Doubles chaos damage you take...
Youre right those are buff
The stun problem can be totally negated in several ways. The double chaos damage is no big deal with high health and ES and chaos resist.
A real drawback would be chilled on chaos damage.
|
Posted byNonsensei436#3648on Dec 9, 2013, 9:32:57 AM
|