Poll about new Darkness and Wild bundles

Bundles should contain the top/high tier cosmetics, low ends are cheap already and not that visible. Atleast when i want one i want to stand out and i am sure as hell aint gonna stand out with 2-12$ weapon effect or pet, but i will with more expensive one. So make those top tier bundles with option to get refund on items that you already have in that pack and i bet it would sell way better.

Plus adding stuff like gore effect (probably my favorite effect) and weapon effect or helm effects are better than putting skill effects because every char can use those and more people will buy those while skill effects only benefit one character (most of the time).

I voted "The bundles were of no interest to me"...

They're a great idea and I certainly look forward to more. None of the bundles really "did it" for me.

The halloween bundle was great. A gore bundle would be great, as well as elemental based bundles.

Finally, one other suggestion for MTs... specifically item effects... instead of being applied to a specific "item" they should be applied to your character "item slot". It becomes a pain to reclaim and re-use an item effect as soon as you find an upgrade. Skills effects are ok as you normally use the skill all the way through, but items constantly change as you level.

Keep up the great work.

I think the prices are fine as they are. I don't see why they'd need to be cheaper unless you want to own every single one of them.

I don't see it as being unreasonable to spend 100$ over a long period of time on a free to play game(that you enjoy playing) to deck out your character and support the developers who, in this case, are not even asking for a monthly fee.

Cheers

Edit: I'm obviously talking about long-term players if that was unclear. For short-term players, I don't see why they'd need heaps of microtransactions if they're not enjoying the game all that much in the first place.

I'd rather purchase single items that I like. I'm not really into the scorpions and I have the fire lizzard(my favorite pet so far). And for the most part, I already have all of the items out of the packs that I want.

"

Firecrest5 wrote:

This. Seems like you'd have much better luck getting 5 people to spring $25 than getting one person to pay $25. The costs associated with many of the micro-transactions are not micro.

I disagree. F2P games are successful on the idea that fewer players will pay a ton and the majority of players will pay little or nothing. GGG has stuff in all price ranges. Sure there are some gaps and a few disappointing MTXs (ie. basic color weapon effects), but, with pets for example, there are neat pets at all price ranges. GGG is trying to encourage the big spenders with high prestige value items while not deterring the small spenders. Unfortunately, many people fixate on the expensive stuff, and get completely turned off. That is not to say, however, that a model based upon smaller very affordable items would be better, since you would lose a ton from the big spenders (both due to the loss of prestige and the loss of big ticket items).

They just didn't contain things I wanted really. If I had extra points laying around I probably would've bought the Darkness one, but I didn't want to buy more points for it when I wasn't crazy about the contents.

Wasn't interested in these bundles but I'm looking forward to seeing different ones

Just waiting for a "summoner's bundles" that could give me summon mummy and statues. That is too enough for me

GGG should make more kind of bundles from expensive (big bundles could save more money) to cheap (easy to choose - you don't need to buy unexpected stuffs.)

Would have got Wild Pack if I didn't already got Emerald RoA from spare points.

i choose to vote "the bundels were of no interest to me" because both packs contain pets
1) i already have two pets i never use
2) i don't need pets, don't care about pets, actually found them to be quite annoying
3) thus won't spend money on any pets in the future which includes bundles that contain them

that doesn't mean i'm against the idea of bundles! actually like it and hope you had the necessary success to offer more of them - maybe even without pets ;)