Is this script legal? i wanna find out before usage.

It's not, this does 3 actions per loop.
\

EDIT: didn't read you made a seperate macro for F1-12 trade.
Yes this is allowed as it is now, but you might as well replace up up with

send, {enter}
send, actual text
send, {enter}

from my experience AHK tends to screw up in chats using up.


Also put "SetKeyDelay, 15" under where you put the hotkey, prevents d/c from acting to fast.
Last edited by Eleziel#6315 on Oct 20, 2013, 7:40:23 AM
"
CrimsonMidget wrote:
It's not, this does 3 actions per loop.
\

EDIT: didn't read you made a seperate macro for F1-12 trade.
Yes this is allowed as it is now, but you might as well replace up up with

send, {enter}
send, actual text
send, {enter}

from my experience AHK tends to screw up in chats using up.


Also put "SetKeyDelay, 15" under where you put the hotkey, prevents d/c from acting to fast.


i would but i cannot link items in a script. so i link the items first then i run the macro...
And there is no "Looping" going on so idk were everyone is getting this from but that is not my intent of this macro. I have no loop action at all, i press F1 and it simply puts me in trade chat 1 and then links/enters the last thing that i said.
Last edited by Smoothz#7197 on Oct 20, 2013, 9:50:48 PM
"
Smoothz wrote:
"
Shodokan123 wrote:
It is considered automation regardless if they can "catch you" or not. Your one input of f1 is actually doing 10 actions.

I don't know their exact stance on it but it is indeed more than one action for a single button press.


Spoiler
F1::Trade1() ; Assign F1 to Switch to trade chat 1
Trade1(){
BlockInput On
Send {Enter}
Sleep 2
Send /trade 1
Send {Enter}
BlockInput Off
return
}

It may have several commands but its only doing one thing, putting me into trade chat 1. thats it.
Now this may be bannable
Spoiler
F1::Trade1() ; Assign F1 to Switch to trade chat 1
Trade1(){
BlockInput On
Send {Enter}
Sleep 2
Send /trade 1
Send {Enter}
Send {Enter}
Sleep 2
Send {Up}
Send {Up}
sleep 20
Send {Enter}
BlockInput Off
return
}

but im not gonna use that until i get confirmation. and i doubt it is.


You don't understand that every letter typed is considered a different action? So regardless of if you are just using the first or second macro you are still doing more than one action in a sequence. Just because you don't have to code your macro to be

send /
send t
send r
send a
send d
send e
send
Send #

Doesn't mean that the macro isn't typing for you, which is automation. Regardless of if it is okay or not, thats how things work.
IGN: Srslyagain
PM me bins on items I bid on if you have one.
"
Shodokan123 wrote:

You don't understand that every letter typed is considered a different action? So regardless of if you are just using the first or second macro you are still doing more than one action in a sequence. Just because you don't have to code your macro to be

send /
send t
send r
send a
send d
send e
send
Send #

Doesn't mean that the macro isn't typing for you, which is automation. Regardless of if it is okay or not, thats how things work.


GGG has said that an /oos macro is fine, but multiple-action macros are not. This would indicate they don't consider "{enter}/oos{enter}" to be six actions.

It would help decide many related questions if they'd be up-front with what "action" means.
IGN: SplitEpimorphism
Pretty sure action translates to a command or ability, {enter} is not a command or ability, so there is no issue using that.

Nothing to see here.
/oos is one command. That's fine.

If you press 1 button to spam 12 chat channels, that's 12 commands. That's not fine. And is fucking annoying.
"
SL4Y3R wrote:
/oos is one command. That's fine.

If you press 1 button to spam 12 chat channels, that's 12 commands. That's not fine. And is fucking annoying.


Of course.

For a bit of caution: neither of the mentioned setups in the OP spam 12 chat channels with one button press.
IGN: SplitEpimorphism

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info