"Its time to ban streamers using exploits" thread removed

"

JoTua#1329 wrote:

"

PaOmi#3123 wrote:

GGG why You removed whole thread "Its time to ban streamers using exploits"? (id 3899056)?

I'm not part of Fubgun's fanbase, but the fault here isn't with Fubgun. The game is still in early access, so bugs are inevitable. You can't arrest people for collecting money when an ATM malfunctions and spills cash. The problem lies with the development team; anything not properly tested is bound to break. Blaming others is always easy. Making Fubgun pay for the lack of GGG (Game-Changing Game) doesn't make sense to me either, sorry.

You actually can arrest ppl that got cash from an ATM malfunction. Its not your cash to take, and you will be charged of stealing money.

"

You can't arrest people for collecting money when an ATM malfunctions and spills cash.

Dude, all you needed to do is a 5 second google search to show that this is wrong. What the hell, why people are making clearly false statements on the Internet when searching for information is so easy.

"

zepberonha#9748 wrote:

"

JoTua#1329 wrote:

"

PaOmi#3123 wrote:

GGG why You removed whole thread "Its time to ban streamers using exploits"? (id 3899056)?

I'm not part of Fubgun's fanbase, but the fault here isn't with Fubgun. The game is still in early access, so bugs are inevitable. You can't arrest people for collecting money when an ATM malfunctions and spills cash. The problem lies with the development team; anything not properly tested is bound to break. Blaming others is always easy. Making Fubgun pay for the lack of GGG (Game-Changing Game) doesn't make sense to me either, sorry.

You actually can arrest ppl that got cash from an ATM malfunction. Its not your cash to take, and you will be charged of stealing money.

Come on, man, this guy has a community of nearly 150,000 people playing PoE2. The league started with 300,000 people; banning half the players would be ridiculous. What I mean is, if the offending players are close to 50%, the system will malfunction. Don't get your hopes up. We saw what happened when the fub. league quit in version 0.2. These guys are like advertising faces for companies; they make the game appealing to their existing audience and new users, in my opinion.

"

JoTua#1329 wrote:

Come on, man, this guy has a community of nearly 150,000 people playing PoE2. The league started with 300,000 people; banning half the players would be ridiculous. What I mean is, if the offending players are close to 50%, the system will malfunction. Don't get your hopes up. We saw what happened when the fub. league quit in version 0.2. These guys are like advertising faces for companies; they make the game appealing to their existing audience and new users, in my opinion.

I doubt nearly all of his fan base participated. Wouldn't wonder if only 10-20 of em really grinded the hell out of this. I bet most of them saw it, tried it maybe but struggled while leveling an alt (got bored) and the rest stopped after max 2 hours of zombi-grind the zone or fell asleep *g*.

Majority very likely played the game as intended and just tried to set up the temple like suggested by Fobgun ... which is 100% FINE!
1 temple/day which then spits out tons of currency after 4 hours of mapping without notable drob is how this league should work in my opinions. And wouldn't have caused even nearly as much damage as the zone-reset-abuse.

"

JoTua#1329 wrote:

"

PaOmi#3123 wrote:

GGG why You removed whole thread "Its time to ban streamers using exploits"? (id 3899056)?

I'm not part of Fubgun's fanbase, but the fault here isn't with Fubgun. The game is still in early access, so bugs are inevitable. You can't arrest people for collecting money when an ATM malfunctions and spills cash. The problem lies with the development team; anything not properly tested is bound to break. Blaming others is always easy. Making Fubgun pay for the lack of GGG (Game-Changing Game) doesn't make sense to me either, sorry.

Keeping things on an abstract level such a mere hypothesis:

- streaming a glitch bug on a live service that player economy it's the core feature... Correct behaviour should be disclose it, not abusing it. That's why he classifies under the 'rat' category under Tarkov rules 🤣

Oh, and doing that for subs/views/clout, adds a far more interesting tone to things...


- 'Jonathan called me, they are going to rollback the league' (not ipsis verbis)... Implying insider information, using the name of the main developer, spreading market instability, mocking the remaining player base which plays legit...


Oh, and doing that for thousands of people...



I don't think even McDonalds would accept him after knowing this. There is no defense possible for such lack of moral and ethical norms.

He falls perfectly under the Tarkov 'rat' stereotype. The best could happen now was this falling in the hands of one of those anger YouTubers with a populist narrative. Accepting such behaviours is the same as saying this game is even a bigger joke than the polemical streamer.

there is another thread about banning streamers...i wonder how long before that gets removed also

"

Johny_Snow#4778 wrote:

"

You can't arrest people for collecting money when an ATM malfunctions and spills cash.

Dude, all you needed to do is a 5 second google search to show that this is wrong. What the hell, why people are making clearly false statements on the Internet when searching for information is so easy.

Oh I understand why he doesn't find any useful information when he uses Google aka "AI slop advertise machine" *g*.