Early Access Feedback - mob density nerf was terrible..... - Forum

" Sakanabi#6664 wrote: I think quite opposite - they should reduce mob density even more but also reduce size of maps. helllll no, thers barely any mobs left are u kidding?!??! but smaller maps i agree on that they are giganntic	Posted by TechnicallBrains#4648 on Dec 19, 2025, 5:48:36 AM Quote this Post
" Sakanabi#6664 wrote: I think quite opposite - they should reduce mob density even more but also reduce size of maps. +1 ... abyss and other mechanics still adds lots of them. "Sigh"	Posted by IonSugeRau1#1069 on Dec 19, 2025, 6:49:13 AM Quote this Post
" IonSugeRau1#1069 wrote: " Sakanabi#6664 wrote: I think quite opposite - they should reduce mob density even more but also reduce size of maps. +1 ... abyss and other mechanics still adds lots of them. dont no...., theres barely any mobs left...	Posted by TechnicallBrains#4648 on Dec 19, 2025, 7:55:17 AM Quote this Post
" TechnicallBrains#4648 wrote: " Sakanabi#6664 wrote: I think quite opposite - they should reduce mob density even more but also reduce size of maps. helllll no, thers barely any mobs left are u kidding?!??! but smaller maps i agree on that they are giganntic No I'm not. The game is still blasting simulator. We need small but hard packs of enemies.	Posted by Sakanabi#6664 on Dec 19, 2025, 8:04:29 AM Quote this Post
Map density is fine IMO. What they should buff is the Pack Size bonuses so that if you REALLY want more density, you should absolutely be allowed to get it.	Posted by vexorian#9572 on Dec 19, 2025, 8:53:34 AM Quote this Post
" Sakanabi#6664 wrote: " TechnicallBrains#4648 wrote: " Sakanabi#6664 wrote: I think quite opposite - they should reduce mob density even more but also reduce size of maps. helllll no, thers barely any mobs left are u kidding?!??! but smaller maps i agree on that they are giganntic No I'm not. The game is still blasting simulator. We need small but hard packs of enemies. no one told u to play an OP build, its early acces, look at Quin he plays the shittiest builds on purpose.	Posted by TechnicallBrains#4648 on Dec 19, 2025, 9:03:28 AM Quote this Post
" TechnicallBrains#4648 wrote: no one told u to play an OP build, its early acces, look at Quin he plays the shittiest builds on purpose. It's not about OP builds. It's about game still being balanced around them. Also I don't care about any content creator. Last edited by Sakanabi#6664 on Dec 19, 2025, 9:24:29 AM	Posted by Sakanabi#6664 on Dec 19, 2025, 9:24:08 AM Quote this Post
It seems okay but when I saw that the compensations are not calculated correctly, I started doubting, to compensate -40% you need +66.666% (1000 -40% is 600, 600 + 66.66% is 999). Tech guy	Posted by Warrax#2850 on Dec 19, 2025, 9:29:16 AM Quote this Post
what do you guys think the "performance improvement" was coming from? less monsters more fps. thats the only reason. nobody believes that "some guys told me less monsters is better" bs from jonathan	Posted by Pl4t1numX#4325 on Dec 19, 2025, 9:57:22 AM Quote this Post
Dont even notice the change to be honest, as many have echoed. If noone said anything I wouldnt know it happened. Mash the clean	Posted by Mashgesture#2912 on Dec 19, 2025, 10:05:03 AM Quote this Post