Open Apology. There is No Secret Quest(maybe?)
|
Like I previously stated. People only comprehend things from their own perspective.
What is chaos to the fly is order to the spider. Proof works the same way. What you deem to be not proof is only so because you view it that way. It has nothing to do with reality and is entirely derived from what you believe. The definition of proof you accept as real is a derivative of the effort you are willing to give to the cause. Some will never see proof until someone holds their hand and walks them through every step. “In all the realms of heaven and in all the realms of hell I alone am heralded as the honored one, who am I?” Last edited by Lore#3772 on Aug 7, 2025, 3:31:41 PM
| |
" but everyone's reality is build solely on their beliefs and perceptions form their own perspective, this naturally extends to collective 'reality'. so we ran into a problem here :P |
|
" No. Because none of us decide what reality is. None of us decide what the universal laws are. They simply exist And some of us do our best to correctly interpret them. We simply interpret reality to the best of our individual ability. Terrance Howard is wrong, 1x1 does not equal 2. But everyone else is wrong as well because 1x1 doesn’t equal 1 either. You people act like I’m an average mind when I can see that there are no two objects in all of the universe that are identical. The only way for objects to be identical is to occupy the same space at the same time which literally cannot happen due to the laws of our universe. While the “greatest minds” of our species argue over 1x1 =1 or 2 I will proudly sit here and call both sides morons. The degree of skill with perspective that is required to know no two things can ever be identical should be enough to prove where I fall on the intelligence spectrum, but clearly the mob can’t be convinced. “In all the realms of heaven and in all the realms of hell I alone am heralded as the honored one, who am I?” Last edited by Lore#3772 on Aug 7, 2025, 3:37:04 PM
| |
" what if I tell you that no object exists beyond its conceptual representation? |
|
" You would be incorrect. Objects exist. The flaw with 1x1 is the fact if you represent it with letters you can instantly find the flaw. 1x1 =? Is the same as A x B = ? Why isn’t it A x A = ? Because you have to choose either object 1 or Object 2 to observe first. The object you are observing is the only one that can be represented with the number 1. There literally have never been 2 snowflakes that are identical since the dawn of time till today and there will never be two identical snowflakes. Period. The problem with humanity is we gloat about the fact we can be accurate to the 14th decimal place when the number of decimal places is in the hundreds of trillions minimum if not thousands of times that. Rounding is all that our math will ever be capable of. So again, I just sauced on the entire mathematics and physics community but somehow I’m the fool. Another way to represent 1 x 1 =? Is .5 + .5 =? Why? Because you can’t ever have truly even halves of anything, it’s the only impossible outcome. As above. So below. Just because you can represent something with a symbol doesn’t make it real. Also fyi this explanation is the solution to the goldbache conjecture. This is why all numbers are prime. There are no whole numbers past 1. Solving the goldbache conjecture isn’t that impressive right? “In all the realms of heaven and in all the realms of hell I alone am heralded as the honored one, who am I?” Last edited by Lore#3772 on Aug 7, 2025, 4:25:32 PM
| |
" never said they didn't. but if you are looking at an 'object' you are already augmenting your 'reality' with predefined concepts. |
|
|
Did you know that the "reality" we see as humans is not the actual reality of the physical world?
It is simply a product of our biology when it comes to our sense of sight, and our natural urge to simplify and describe what we experience in a cogent way. What is the ACTUAL color of grass? We perceive it as green but that is only because the unique processing of light done by our eyes filters it out as "green". In fact, its probably more accurate to say grass is every color EXCEPT green. What even IS the concept of "green"? Since that label is based solely on OUR perception of reality, and not on a concrete "fact"...."green" and all colors are merely made up constructs we use to simplify existence so that our tiny minds can comprehend our own perception of reality. All this basically means "there is no spoon". Starting anew....with PoE 2 Last edited by cowmoo275#3095 on Aug 7, 2025, 4:39:08 PM
|
|
|
You have fallen into the trap of observer bias.
If there are no observers the objects still exist. The observer can never fully observe an object. It’s beyond comprehension how many things you’d have to take into account and measure. Every single object in the entire universe is “pulling” on each other even if it’s down to the hundreds of quadrillions decimal place. To observe any object correctly you’d need to first observe every other object as it exists the moment you are observing the original object. Which isn’t possible. “In all the realms of heaven and in all the realms of hell I alone am heralded as the honored one, who am I?” Last edited by Lore#3772 on Aug 7, 2025, 4:41:00 PM
| |
" This is not true. One can't possibly confirm that with 100% certainty. It's Schrodinger's Cat. The object both exists AND doesn't exist simultaneously if there are no observers. Existence itself is just another construct that we invented to try and order something that cannot be ordered. Starting anew....with PoE 2 Last edited by cowmoo275#3095 on Aug 7, 2025, 4:42:06 PM
|
|
" Let’s say 2 snowflakes look identical under a microscope, what’s the limiting factor? Magnification. The smaller you go down to observe the more differences you will find, not similarities. All you have to do to prove me wrong is prove that 2 objects can exist in the same exact space and time. Fun fact the nuclear bomb exists because it’s not possible to do. (But they split atoms not make them occupy the same space!) you are correct, but you forgot as above so below. The rules are constants no matter of you are below or above 1. Let’s go back to snowflakes, let’s say they look identical, well is the conditions that created them identical? Is the earth in the same exact space in the universe as both are created? Are both created on the same day? Same hour? You don’t get it, there are nearly infinite questions I can ask that further define the differences. Similarities are limited. It is metrically and measurably impossible for two things to ever be identical. Period end of the whole story. Identical twins don’t occupy the same space in time. They don’t have the same number of cells. They don’t age at the same rates. They are constantly having seperate forces enacted upon them. The only thing you have to link them is parentage and whatever decimal place we evaluate dna to. The further down the decimals you go the sooner you’ll see identical twins don’t even exist. “In all the realms of heaven and in all the realms of hell I alone am heralded as the honored one, who am I?” Last edited by Lore#3772 on Aug 7, 2025, 4:48:39 PM
|
