Updates on Bluesky not only twitter please

"

DistributedAutomaton#5739 wrote:

"

Haziza#1519 wrote:

No one use BlueSky though

3.5 million daily users, compared to X's 230 million. Some technical and scientific fields have moved almost fully off of X. I basically need a Bluesky account for work, even though I barely post there, and I don't need an X account. Sports teams and other large draws are on X; it's mostly the nerds (and people with political disagreements with Musk) who have left.

Re: the OP: sure, it'd be nice if GGG joined Bluesky. I'd probably follow them.

I tried to use it and they shut down my account and asked me for my ID. I dislike twitter and the mission that the current owner of twitter has set twitter upon, but I wouldn't consider Bluesky a viable alternative. The fundamental problem is that it requires deep state levels of money to run the site at scale and if it requires deep state levels of money then you're going to have to make sacrifices when it comes to moderation in order to accommodate the people proffering up those levels of money.

If you figure out how to truly democratize multimedia communication then we'll talk, but as it stands we're probably going to be facing down a big fracturing of the current social media ecosystem as places like latin america and europe work towards their own sovereign ecosystem.

No, take that goofy [Removed by Support] crap somewhere else. Don't want updates on X? Then use this site. Problem solved.