We need more improvements faster

"
Mipzhap#6194 wrote:


P.s. if the endgame has gotten boring because of lack of content: play something else in the meantime. 700 is an abnormal amount of time for something that has been out for less than 2 months. If you have that amount of time to play, don't expect one game, especially in EA, to have content enough for you. :-)


Yea I might a small issue with the hours I spend in the game :D Maybe I should go touch some grass, or snow in this case :D Well, maybe...

I have been running the campaing with several characters just because it is awesome. But yea the end game is a bit tedious.

You stand before the gates of the Lord's Labyrinth. Within these walls, the Lady of Justice doth preside.
They should just let us know what they are working on and what are they planing for the next big update. Maybe let us also know what they have learned out of the 2 months so far and how will that influence further development.

Expecting constant updates in EA is a bit unrealistic, that's a very inefficient way to do software development on an incomplete product.
Last edited by Randall#0850 on Jan 29, 2025, 7:44:08 AM
+1

I stopped playing, and I've been waiting for a patch. It seems I'm not alone looking at the numbers; most players have left and the daily cycle/players count is a fraction of what it used to sustain.
"
Randall#0850 wrote:
Expecting constant updates in EA is a bit unrealistic, that's a very inefficient way to do software development on an incomplete product.


This. Releases create overhead. no matter how small they are. Having this every week (or even multiple times a week as some people suggest) is a giant waste of time. I agree that EA is a time where you need a quicker patch cycle in order to get feedback on incremental improvements but you have to find a balance.

People have been throwing the "2 months" number around for a week now. Guys, it will be 2 months on Feb 6nd and not before. Plus there was a 2-3 week Christmas break in there. Get your chill pills and let them cook for a bit longer, I beg you.
"
but you have to find a balance.

That's exactly what this thread is about. GGG is dropping the ball.
"
"
Randall#0850 wrote:
Expecting constant updates in EA is a bit unrealistic, that's a very inefficient way to do software development on an incomplete product.


This. Releases create overhead. no matter how small they are. Having this every week (or even multiple times a week as some people suggest) is a giant waste of time. I agree that EA is a time where you need a quicker patch cycle in order to get feedback on incremental improvements but you have to find a balance.

People have been throwing the "2 months" number around for a week now. Guys, it will be 2 months on Feb 6nd and not before. Plus there was a 2-3 week Christmas break in there. Get your chill pills and let them cook for a bit longer, I beg you.



I'm curious what timeline you expect this game to release? never? your standards aren't realistic. or even the standards the company themselves have set

ea shouldn't get regularly updated?

LMAOOOOOOOO

ummm this game is set to release at 6 months at the earliest. but somehow we're still talking about breaks a few days away from feb....
"
toxiitea#5772 wrote:
"
"
Randall#0850 wrote:
Expecting constant updates in EA is a bit unrealistic, that's a very inefficient way to do software development on an incomplete product.


This. Releases create overhead. no matter how small they are. Having this every week (or even multiple times a week as some people suggest) is a giant waste of time. I agree that EA is a time where you need a quicker patch cycle in order to get feedback on incremental improvements but you have to find a balance.

People have been throwing the "2 months" number around for a week now. Guys, it will be 2 months on Feb 6nd and not before. Plus there was a 2-3 week Christmas break in there. Get your chill pills and let them cook for a bit longer, I beg you.



I'm curious what timeline you expect this game to release? never? your standards aren't realistic. or even the standards the company themselves have set

ea shouldn't get regularly updated?

LMAOOOOOOOO

ummm this game is set to release at 6 months at the earliest. but somehow we're still talking about breaks a few days away from feb....


Regular updates != constant updates which is what the first post is asking for.
"
Randall#0850 wrote:


Regular updates != constant updates which is what the first post is asking for.


what update have they added in two months?

lights in fog where to point of the fog was to hide citadels? waypoints?

these are lazy quick fixes.

you do realize they said druid and huntress would be available fairly quickly? none of the things they've said has been met.

I'd recommend watching their latest interview where 80% of the answers are "we don't know, not enough info."

no wonder the quality is so piss poor. because patrons like yourself eat up the bare minimum with such vigorous passion and then question the consumer instead of the billion backed entity known as tencent-ggg
"
toxiitea#5772 wrote:


what update have they added in two months?


https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-forum/2212

You're welcome

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info