4x5 extra inventory ONLY for warrior ?

"

Poe2WarriorMan#6401 wrote:

you realize .... its an ascendancy passive?

Its not warrior that gets it.

Its just titan, and if they want to take it.

They take it because it leads to potentially the most busted passive in the game. Hulking Form.

Even that's not a 'good' passive in my book because it's just stats. They specifically changed Deadeye and Raider in PoE1 because generic stats passives. Here they go doing it again.

"

Xzorn#7046 wrote:

"

Poe2WarriorMan#6401 wrote:

you realize .... its an ascendancy passive?

Its not warrior that gets it.

Its just titan, and if they want to take it.

They take it because it leads to potentially the most busted passive in the game. Hulking Form.

Even that's not a 'good' passive in my book because it's just stats. They specifically changed Deadeye and Raider in PoE1 because generic stats passives. Here they go doing it again.

Personally I am not using it but to each their own. The bag ... I get enough loot as it is.

And I will get more damage from the other nodes with how I am making my build (at least I think) as the tree has no multiplier nodes just additive, whereas the ascendancies have multipliers (MORE damage). I guess if I didnt NEED the body armour asc id take it for the bag? Nah id go with 15% life.

So no I would never take that thing in my current build.

It reminds me of the affliction baggy we got and I really only used that thing for my scrolls and gem swaps.

Which... scrolls you dont really use anymore so it would just be gem swaps but ... I havent had a situation where I would even beable to do that because of support limit.

The little baggy wouldnt be this huge thing people are making it out to be. Its 2 body armours and 2 helmets in size lol....

people are upset about the only ascendancy passive that adds 0 power. wow. what was that mike judge movie?

"

RKxZlcLUUF#5704 wrote:

people are upset about the only ascendancy passive that adds 0 power. wow. what was that mike judge movie?

If its no big deal , so why not giving to ALL classes ?
For me I would select it over some minor stupid mini-bufs.

"

Annastasia_Steele#3866 wrote:

It should be a quest selectable reward or something......

Locking this only for 1 char is IMHO very, very stupid.

I do not think you get it. That is a HORRIBLE ascendency node.. that is there to gateway to a strong ascendency node. No one WANTS that extra stash.

Yes, its kind of sad that you have to spend your ascendancy points on it, on top of that. I didn't realize that the 50% small passive bonus didnt count for attribute nodes. The only reason i respecced this way was to make giants blood work because i needed like 545 strength. Once i respecced my ascendancy nodes for this i did maybe 1 map and quit titan and rerolled monk. Best decision i made so far.

"

Rafkin4#7914 wrote:

They did a good job with Infernalist and they got tired, so the rest are pretty lame and not thought out.

For Blood Mage your first "bonus" is now spells cost health AND mana. No bonus, just added costs. Enjoy your new, more powerful class.

They didn't even try with Deadeye, just have some more passive points (which is good, but boring)

Chrono gets to reduce cooldowns, in a game with very few cooldowns.

Stormweaver isn't bad, but half their nodes are also in the normal passive tree.

Just fucking lazy GGG

yeah ascendancy is kinda meh

Come on, are we really going to get bent out of shape because of "extra" inventory space? Not like its a huge game changer to have extra slots... Not sure how you survived early stages of Act 1 with constantly going to town and sell off.

Ill give 3% ress to all , for that stash for my Sorc.