Trans gems in SSF are WAY too hard to get.

"
Coconutdoggy wrote:
No you chose to play that mode.



GTFO with this troll and bait comment. Just because we play SSF, doesn't mean there is an excuse for bad game design. We SHOULD be allowed to choose which transfigured variant of a gem we want, instead of it being random.
"
Ayxera wrote:
"
Coconutdoggy wrote:
No you chose to play that mode.



GTFO with this troll and bait comment. Just because we play SSF, doesn't mean there is an excuse for bad game design. We SHOULD be allowed to choose which transfigured variant of a gem we want, instead of it being random.


You can yell all you want; It won't change the state.
Dys an sohm
Rohs an kyn
Sahl djahs afah
Mah morn narr
Maybe to try and explain the point coco is making here.

GGG is obsessed with trade and economy. They think it's the centerpillar of any ARPG. Hence this entire game is fundamentally designed and balanced around trading. You can hate this as much as i do but it ain't gonna change.

SSF is a bait mode that was initially introduced because some people took pride in playing without trade and wanted a batch of honor for doing that. That's the entire point of SSF. There is zero balancing around that mode. It's the exact same game as trade league just that you aren't allowed to trade. This means the grinding required to do anything is several hundred times higher.

Your suggestion and similar ones have been made a billion times over the last decade and they all fell on deaf ears. Everything in this game is balanced around trade, lock yourself out of that at your own peril.

You are free to make this feedback but you are wasting your time.
"
Baharoth15 wrote:
Maybe to try and explain the point coco is making here.

GGG is obsessed with trade and economy. They think it's the centerpillar of any ARPG. Hence this entire game is fundamentally designed and balanced around trading. You can hate this as much as i do but it ain't gonna change.

SSF is a bait mode that was initially introduced because some people took pride in playing without trade and wanted a batch of honor for doing that. That's the entire point of SSF. There is zero balancing around that mode. It's the exact same game as trade league just that you aren't allowed to trade. This means the grinding required to do anything is several hundred times higher.

Your suggestion and similar ones have been made a billion times over the last decade and they all fell on deaf ears. Everything in this game is balanced around trade, lock yourself out of that at your own peril.

You are free to make this feedback but you are wasting your time.


If trading wasn't such an awful experience then I wouldn't be playing SSF
"
Baharoth15 wrote:
Maybe to try and explain the point coco is making here.

GGG is obsessed with trade and economy. They think it's the centerpillar of any ARPG. Hence this entire game is fundamentally designed and balanced around trading. You can hate this as much as i do but it ain't gonna change.

SSF is a bait mode that was initially introduced because some people took pride in playing without trade and wanted a batch of honor for doing that. That's the entire point of SSF. There is zero balancing around that mode. It's the exact same game as trade league just that you aren't allowed to trade. This means the grinding required to do anything is several hundred times higher.

Your suggestion and similar ones have been made a billion times over the last decade and they all fell on deaf ears. Everything in this game is balanced around trade, lock yourself out of that at your own peril.

You are free to make this feedback but you are wasting your time.


Regardless, this has nothing to do with trade versus ssf and balancing. It is literally just a skill gem, it should not take hours to obtain. They NEED to remove the "random" in the craft "transfigure a non corrupted skill gem into a random transfigured variant"
Again, GGG won't do any balancing around SSF, not for gear, not for gems nothing. Yes, that's stupid and bad game design but it's basically their core design philosophy. They won't change it.

Rather than SSF, play trade league and just minimize the amount of trading you do since it sucks. Locking yourself out entirely will fuck you up way more than doing a trade or two per month.
"
Baharoth15 wrote:
Again, GGG won't do any balancing around SSF, not for gear, not for gems nothing. Yes, that's stupid and bad game design but it's basically their core design philosophy. They won't change it.

Rather than SSF, play trade league and just minimize the amount of trading you do since it sucks. Locking yourself out entirely will fuck you up way more than doing a trade or two per month.


No. Trade sucks, and so does lab. This is an issue for trade players on league start as well.
"
Ayxera wrote:
"
Baharoth15 wrote:
Again, GGG won't do any balancing around SSF, not for gear, not for gems nothing. Yes, that's stupid and bad game design but it's basically their core design philosophy. They won't change it.

Rather than SSF, play trade league and just minimize the amount of trading you do since it sucks. Locking yourself out entirely will fuck you up way more than doing a trade or two per month.


No. Trade sucks, and so does lab. This is an issue for trade players on league start as well.


lol no it doesn't they just trade it.

You can say anything sucks as much as you want fact is it won't change no matter the amount of things you say that suck.
Dys an sohm
Rohs an kyn
Sahl djahs afah
Mah morn narr
Last edited by Coconutdoggy#1805 on Apr 22, 2024, 3:43:58 AM
"
Coconutdoggy wrote:
"
Ayxera wrote:
"
Baharoth15 wrote:
Again, GGG won't do any balancing around SSF, not for gear, not for gems nothing. Yes, that's stupid and bad game design but it's basically their core design philosophy. They won't change it.

Rather than SSF, play trade league and just minimize the amount of trading you do since it sucks. Locking yourself out entirely will fuck you up way more than doing a trade or two per month.


No. Trade sucks, and so does lab. This is an issue for trade players on league start as well.


lol no it doesn't they just trade it.

You can say anything sucks as much as you want fact is it won't change no matter the amount of things you say that suck.


It will change, because GGG is a fan of good game design not bad game design and the way it is right now is bad game design. Also, go play the game instead of baiting responses ty
"
Ayxera wrote:

It will change, because GGG is a fan of good game design not bad game design and the way it is right now is bad game design. Also, go play the game instead of baiting responses ty


Dude, the game has been designed like this for a freaking decade. Do you really think it would still be like this after such a long time if GGG was a fan of "good" game design? Get real. This isn't some bug or oversight, it's a deliberate design choice based on their fundamental design principles.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info