"
Sairven wrote:
"
DamageIncorporated wrote:
Don't play semantics. He suggested he does just fine with low armor and evasion cuz he's a summoner. Completely out of context and useless suggestion.
What a derpy build, to get mobs OFF of you, as melee. Come on man, use your head.
Also, he goes on to suggest Ice Arrows totem, zombies and a spectre. He IS suggesting he be a summoner.
Don't bother responding, I won't dignify it with an answer.
You use "semantics" a lot. I seriously do not think you know the meaning of that word.
You also insult people a lot. And I seem to recall always seeing you on probation. There's probably a reason for that, but I just can't make the connection!
You've got to be trolling.
I've been on probation ONCE, and it was from responding to posts like yours.
And I suggest you go look up the word. I know the meaning just fine.
|
|
"
DamageIncorporated wrote:
"
Sairven wrote:
"
DamageIncorporated wrote:
Don't play semantics. He suggested he does just fine with low armor and evasion cuz he's a summoner. Completely out of context and useless suggestion.
What a derpy build, to get mobs OFF of you, as melee. Come on man, use your head.
Also, he goes on to suggest Ice Arrows totem, zombies and a spectre. He IS suggesting he be a summoner.
Don't bother responding, I won't dignify it with an answer.
You use "semantics" a lot. I seriously do not think you know the meaning of that word.
You also insult people a lot. And I seem to recall always seeing you on probation. There's probably a reason for that, but I just can't make the connection!
You've got to be trolling.
I've been on probation ONCE, and it was from responding to posts like yours.
And I suggest you go look up the word. I know the meaning just fine.
Knowing the definition is one thing. Using it correctly is quite another.
Skeletotems is an option to take the heat off. You don't have to cast it all the time.
"In a state of physical balance and security, power, intellectual as well as physical, would be out of place."
- H. G. Wells, The Time Machine
|
Posted bySairven#6746on Apr 12, 2013, 11:31:27 AM
|
"
You use "semantics" a lot. I seriously do not think you know the meaning of that word.
You also insult people a lot.
Hi. You may wish to be aware that my perception as a neutral observer is, you just insulted him. Being "right" is not a get out of jail free card. Just food for thought, there.
Driving by, moving on,
--C
|
Posted byCourageous#0687on Apr 12, 2013, 11:45:27 AM
|
"
Courageous wrote:
"
You use "semantics" a lot. I seriously do not think you know the meaning of that word.
You also insult people a lot.
Hi. You may wish to be aware that my perception as a neutral observer is, you just insulted him. Being "right" is not a get out of jail free card. Just food for thought, there.
Driving by, moving on,
--C
You may also want to note why I insulted him: Because he flat out called another human stupid without thinking.
"In a state of physical balance and security, power, intellectual as well as physical, would be out of place."
- H. G. Wells, The Time Machine
|
Posted bySairven#6746on Apr 12, 2013, 11:47:20 AM
|
eva and armour both suck is this game atm, stack life nodes and nothing els, and win.
|
Posted bydanny868686#3811on Apr 12, 2013, 11:47:55 AM
|
So when it comes to evading an attack, it's an all-or-nothing situation.
Success: no damage taken
Failure: full damage taken
The problem is that there's no middle-ground, yeah?
Perhaps there should be a second roll if you fail the first roll to fully evade -- with the result determining whether you take the entire hit or only receive a "glancing blow" for partially reduced damage and a chance to be stunned or something?
|
Posted byWrae#1171on Apr 12, 2013, 11:48:46 AM
|
"
You may also want to note why I insulted him,,,
Nope. Don't want to know. You know what happens in a food fight? Everyone gets covered in food, that's what.
--C
|
Posted byCourageous#0687on Apr 12, 2013, 11:56:07 AM
|
"
danny868686 wrote:
eva and armour both suck is this game atm, stack life nodes and nothing els, and win.
you totaly wrong
i use both and put 9 points to passive armor and evasion nodes
if i take off that points and put it in life, i die very fast from mobs i can facetank with it.
more explanations here http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/315606
"
Wrae wrote:
So when it comes to evading an attack, it's an all-or-nothing situation.
Success: no damage taken
Failure: full damage taken
The problem is that there's no middle-ground, yeah?
Perhaps there should be a second roll if you fail the first roll to fully evade -- with the result determining whether you take the entire hit or only receive a "glancing blow" for partially reduced damage and a chance to be stunned or something?
success no damage taken
success and crit we have roll versus crit(take all crit damage or only base damage)
failture: full damage taken
i found middle for you
Last edited by LendoKaar#1071 on Apr 12, 2013, 12:54:33 PM
|
Posted byLendoKaar#1071on Apr 12, 2013, 12:51:59 PM
|
"
Wrae wrote:
So when it comes to evading an attack, it's an all-or-nothing situation.
Success: no damage taken
Failure: full damage taken
The problem is that there's no middle-ground, yeah?
Perhaps there should be a second roll if you fail the first roll to fully evade -- with the result determining whether you take the entire hit or only receive a "glancing blow" for partially reduced damage and a chance to be stunned or something?
Middle ground?
You have a very high chance of NOT getting hit.
But, chances are you will get hit.
Middle ground is IAS, Life leech, Life on Hit, life regen and of couse enough health to take a hit.
|
Posted byVooodu#7002on Apr 12, 2013, 1:54:30 PM
|
"
Vakirauta wrote:
Does anyone have any examples of an ARPG or MMO where stacking HP is the only way to stay alive? I'd like to know Charan.
Diablo 2.
|
Posted byKoivu#2073on Apr 12, 2013, 5:14:27 PM
|