Banned on tft - for no reason a whole section of trade no more accessable

If you look on TFT Blacklist you can see what happened.


It looks like Player A Messaged OP to buy 5 for 150
OP Replied after Heist
Player A then messaged another player to Buy 9 for 225
OP invited player A and sold him 5 for 225 while Player A thought he was buying the 9.

He noticed the Mistake and asked for a refund as he thought he was invited by the person selling 225.


You were then rude etc.

TFT mod posted your reply to the Mod.. with you cursing at the mod.



Don't be a turd and take advantage of someone making a mistake. though.. see #3 below.



1: Person should have checked the Trade.
2: You knew he was making a mistake and took advantage of it.
3: TFT has nothing to do with Trade site, so if you don't use TFT it wont matter.


ofc unless im reading the logs wrong.
Last edited by SPYDER680#3552 on Nov 10, 2021, 4:57:22 PM
I don't even know what TFT is, I'm assuming it's a trade site. I dunno, I just use the official trade. I also don't have discord, because 50% of all people are scum, so best to just ignore them. If someone you traded, comes back and wants money returned, RIGHT CLICK their name and click Ignore. Problem solved. No need to waste your energy on stupid people.
“There is a beast in man that should be exercised, not exorcised.”
― Anton LaVey
Looks like OP got busted for "playing along" with the mistake of the buyer then pleading to be innocent :P . He probably would have been fine on an appeal if he wasn't taking the rude approach with the person he talked to in the mod/admin team.

Conclusion. In general people writing about "getting banned for no reason" usually leave out critical information :P

Last edited by arknath#4740 on Nov 10, 2021, 6:03:25 PM
"
arknath wrote:


Conclusion. In general people writing about "getting banned for no reason" usually leave out critical information :P



Ironically the fact that the OP didn't mention such important detail (that he was rude to the mod) pretty much proves that he knows that he is guilty and knows the exact reason of his ban. If he really believed the ban was undeserved he would have come clean and told what happened exactly. Instead he tried playing innocent and left out the exact part which proves his guilt.
This is funny stuff to read. This is exactly the positive human-to-human interaction that Chris envisioned with his excellent trade system. Keep the drama flowing.
"
Clean_Old_Man wrote:

They didn't even bother to uphold the "rule of law", which states that ,"people are innocent until PROVEN guilty".




rule of law?

what laws have been broken?




i love the way people seem to think things like freedom of speech laws or presumption of innocence in a legal trial in their country somehow applies to arguments with strangers on the internet via text media.

youre not in court, no ones getting thrown in jail.
I love all you people on the forums, we can disagree but still be friends and respect each other :)
"
Snorkle_uk wrote:
"
Clean_Old_Man wrote:

They didn't even bother to uphold the "rule of law", which states that ,"people are innocent until PROVEN guilty".




rule of law?

what laws have been broken?




i love the way people seem to think things like freedom of speech laws or presumption of innocence in a legal trial in their country somehow applies to arguments with strangers on the internet via text media.

youre not in court, no ones getting thrown in jail.


Everyone is innocent until proven guilty. To prejudge a person and convicting him before evidence? Not just in court you dimwit, it also applies in real life. "You better have evidence before you run your mouth off accusing someone for doing ???? Ever heard of that?

OOO maybe it works for you in your third world country, but certainly not mine.
Last edited by Clean_Old_Man#7337 on Nov 21, 2021, 11:49:09 AM
Give it a rest. You bumped a month old thread to tell us that? He wasn't convicted. A bunch of people on the internet didn't want to play with him anymore.
Wow. Have an absolutely glorious day.
"
Clean_Old_Man wrote:

Everyone is innocent until proven guilty. To prejudge a person and convicting him before evidence? Not just in court you dimwit, it also applies in real life.


convict
verb
/kənˈvɪkt/
declare (someone) to be guilty of a criminal offence by the verdict of a jury or the decision of a judge in a court of law.


this is what you said...

"
Clean_Old_Man wrote:

They didn't even bother to uphold the "rule of law", which states that ,"people are innocent until PROVEN guilty".



this is the internet, and this is a conversation between 2 people. which countries jurisdiction are they in and what are the laws surrounding banning someone from your discord? afaik i could ban anyone from my discord at any time for no reason at all.





"
Clean_Old_Man wrote:

OOO maybe it works for you in your third world country, but certainly not mine.



i live in the united kingdom, i come from london, the capital of england. if you know anything about the world you will know london is just about as far from the 3rd world as a city gets. were communicating in english right now, its pretty much the accepted standard language of the 1st world.

from wiki on common law...

"
Common law and equity are systems of law whose sources are the decisions in cases by judges. In addition, every system will have a legislature that passes new laws and statutes.

common law developed in England, influenced by Anglo-Saxon law and to a much lesser extent by the Norman conquest of England, which introduced legal concepts from Norman law, which, in turn, had its origins in Salic law. Common law was later inherited by the Commonwealth of Nations, and almost every former colony of the British Empire has adopted it (Malta being an exception).

Common law is practiced in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, most of the United Kingdom, South Africa, Ireland, India, Pakistan, Hong Kong, the United States, Bangladesh and many other places.

One of the most fundamental documents to shape common law is the English Magna Carta which placed limits on the power of the English Kings. It served as a kind of medieval bill of rights for the aristocracy and the judiciary who developed the law.



the court system in the uk is about 1000 years old. civil law comes form the roman empire, which england was a part of 2000 years ago. so we are somewhat familiar with the concepts of civil and common law that govern modern societies.
I love all you people on the forums, we can disagree but still be friends and respect each other :)

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info