No politics in chat
yea its like if 2 people get into argument on game then one goes and shoots other, and they say why did you allow them to fight like this on your platform they can go well its in a our TOS. Im sure they could care less what people talk about unless it causes problem.
|
![]() |
" Ah, well you prefer no politics, so we need to cater to your exact wishes I guess and ban the things you don't like. Really though. If you don't like it, find a different group to talk to. |
![]() |
Most ppl prefer no politics ingame, keep that stuff on twitter with the other weirdos.
Normally i am always against cencorship of any kind but my god has global and the forums improved with this policy. [Removed by Support]
Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” |
![]() |
" What should we do with the people that have a political statement in their signatures ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drDs-Y5DNH8
|
![]() |
And what political statement would that be?
[Removed by Support]
Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” |
![]() |
I would classify a political statement as: if it thematics a current discussion amongst the collective.
I think this is what politics boils down to. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drDs-Y5DNH8
|
![]() |
Well i am not some twitter weirdo, so i don't bring race into politics.
To be fair you could argue that it is indirectly political cause this statement is in part meant to show how stupid it is to bring race into politics, but as such it's certainly not meant to be. Also your statement is to broad, according to that definition anything and everything is political, the very thing i dispute. [Removed by Support]
Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” |
![]() |
So, to quote several politicians: "Let´s not politicize that".
In this case i will leave my statement in the signature which proclaims that the thoughts are free and cannot be controlled by others. A proof for the inability to censor the exchange of thoughts. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drDs-Y5DNH8
|
![]() |