Just cos you find something tedious does not mean changing it is just a QOL improvement

i mean i agree that some Reddit content is very good but imagine this the whole general discussion is full of copypasta of every single post from Reddit like "hey look at this Reddit post it got 200 upvotes, let share it to GD", oh hey that another one, and another one.

Last edited by Ozxell#4971 on Jun 2, 2020, 10:29:36 AM
"
Just cos you find something tedious does not mean changing it is just a QOL improvement


It is though.
Maybe you have an opinion about what is or is not "crossing the line", but this is close to textbook definition.

Accept that some things are matters of gradients. You don't have to justify your opinion by arbitrarely re-categorizing item.

You are pro certain QoL changes, and you are against others.
You don't need to stand as the guy who is for every QoL changes because QoL-is-a-good-thing-that-saves-the-planet-and-the-melting-of-polar-bears, and then refabricates what QoL means to suit your beliefs.
"
Ozxell wrote:
i mean i agree that some Reddit content is very good but imagine this the whole general discussion is full of copypasta of every single post from Reddit like "hey look at this Reddit post it got 200 upvotes, let share it to GD", oh hey that another one, and another one.


That's not what is happening though, is it?
"
LennyLen wrote:
"
Ozxell wrote:
i mean i agree that some Reddit content is very good but imagine this the whole general discussion is full of copypasta of every single post from Reddit like "hey look at this Reddit post it got 200 upvotes, let share it to GD", oh hey that another one, and another one.


That's not what is happening though, is it?


that right, just a single piece of garbage on the ocean will not change anything. until it does.
I think it's not that simple.
If we look at the opportunity costs, we can find them in every way that makes something less accessible. It is more complex and subjective.

Lets argue this: almost every (if not literally every) QoL change is an opportunity cost to someone.

Can You disprove it? I can easly prove it. It just takes to find that one dude who farm less, pick up less, or spends less hours in game due to the lack of given QoL change. Which in long term means this one dude has less of an impact in inflating value of that item.

Obviously this example is highly hyperbolic but still shows how this works.
Now, it only comes down to mesure how much impact given QoL makes. Is that impact desired? Is it acceptable? As many ppl in here as many opinions on that You will find.

What Im trying to say it is not entirely correct trying to disprove something being a QoL change solely on the fact (or opinion) it's gonna have impact on gameplay. Coz every change has it and every QoL change is able to inflate value of an item.

To make it less confusing. Im not arguing these changes don't have long term impact coz they probably have. Im opposing opinion that they shouldn't be called QoL changes coz of that impact. Something being a QoL change doesnt automatically mean it's not gonna have long term ramifications.

On the other hand ppl tend to use term "Qualit of Life Change" without actually realizing it might have an impact on other areas of the game, like mentioned economy. But then again, how many ppl actually take time to think, analyze what they do or say? it's the world and the peeps man.
I know all player come and say : "ahahah nice, u have try a bot u get ban, sooo nice" but i tell u its just for try, for see and for know. I have use this 10 minutes maximum and i have insta uninstall." - some not-too-bright dude, 2013; Joined 2012, † 2013.
"
Ozxell wrote:
"
LennyLen wrote:
"
Ozxell wrote:
i mean i agree that some Reddit content is very good but imagine this the whole general discussion is full of copypasta of every single post from Reddit like "hey look at this Reddit post it got 200 upvotes, let share it to GD", oh hey that another one, and another one.


That's not what is happening though, is it?


that right, just a single piece of garbage on the ocean will not change anything. until it does.


Single pieces of garbage eventually spoil the ocean because the ocean is of a fixed size and the ratio of garbage to ocean increases.

The forum however grows at the same rate as the number of these posts, so the ratio is maintained.

Whether or not these posts should be considered garbage is also a matter of opinion, and in that matter, you seem to be in the minority.

"
LennyLen wrote:


Single pieces of garbage eventually spoil the ocean because the ocean is of a fixed size and the ratio of garbage to ocean increases.

The forum however grows at the same rate as the number of these posts, so the ratio is maintained.

Whether or not these posts should be considered garbage is also a matter of opinion, and in that matter, you seem to be in the minority.



first of all, I think you wrong about the forum grows rate because almost no one in this forum goes to the second page, everybody sticks on the first page which never grows, the number of the thread in the first page will remain the same no matter what.

and about the garbage thing, I don't mean to compare this post to garbage, like I said I agree some of these posts are very good but I bring it up because it is easier to understand that some small action can lead to a major problem which is too late to do anything about it.

i think this will be the last reply from me because I already made my point, like it or not is your decision.
"
Ozxell wrote:
i think this will be the last reply from me because I already made my point, like it or not is your decision.


At the end of the day, stuff will either get posted or it wont, no matter what you or I think, so there's probably point in arguing over it.
Okay, MAYBE loot pets will do something something whatever to the market, but currency should at least not take up inventory slots. Make it a separate pocket, for very specific currency pieces, like Scrolls, Alchemy, Scouring, etc. At least THAT would be QoL and not some game-breaking mechanical change or something to QQ over due to sales lost in some imaginary marketplace.
"
Exile009 wrote:
Uh huh. Tell me that on my many other threads from there that've been appreciated here cos it brought information from there here.


I usually appreciate when you post your PSA's here that contain actual information, so I don't have to swim through all the reddit nonsense. I don't understand why you would decide to start posting said reddit nonsense here though. Random people posting longwinded and misguided opinions based around not understanding what QoL means... isn't important.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info