RIP Bisco's?

"
Hallsttattian wrote:
Only 2 threads in less than 10 minutes? Where's the third one? You're slacking.

On point your practical results are not only debatable but also inexistent. Or you'd have posted them in your main.


yup just suns usual preteen girly drama thinking his precious pixels are gonna lose value in standard
nice
d:-D*
"
awright wrote:
"
SunL4D2 wrote:
Practical results > Theoretical reults.



So I presume you have logged your practical results and have a strong enough dataset to make a statement like that yes ?

There is "Not enough sample size" memes going around even if person did 1000 runs.

"
Hallsttattian wrote:
Only 2 threads in less than 10 minutes? Where's the third one? You're slacking.

On point your practical results are not only debatable but also inexistent. Or you'd have posted them in your main.

Gimme a break :p

I will probably post them later. When I will acquire gg corruption Bisco's in next League, because what if by any chance that post would have massive impact on economy (lol) ?

"
awright wrote:
"
Hallsttattian wrote:
Only 2 threads in less than 10 minutes? Where's the third one? You're slacking.

On point your practical results are not only debatable but also inexistent. Or you'd have posted them in your main.


yup just suns usual preteen girly drama thinking his precious pixels are gonna lose value in standard

I don't worry about Standard.
They remove iq gem along time ago. Than put it in a unique neck. Me never understood.
So how does making a thread titled "RIP Bisco's" not equate to girly drama when even with the nerf, its still BIS for IIQ builds ?

Its

Still

The

Best


How the fuck is it ripped ?

And what a fucking surprise that you make excuses over posting your data after slating someone with actual data



"
Furioushobo wrote:
They remove iq gem along time ago. Than put it in a unique neck. Me never understood.



someone paid for it. simple as that.
Last edited by awright#1711 on Feb 27, 2018, 2:30:41 AM
hahahahaha

I'm still laughing, all the bisco fans will QQ for days now, priceless
YES I support the game, NO I don't agree with many GGG decisions

Lab still sucks balls.

I miss Zana already.
Very severe.

You're better off using a shaped IIQ amulet or replace a piece of gear with pure IIQ.

Whatever the case is or what you do Biscos is simply not worth using anymore the net loss is way too much.

Dys an sohm
Rohs an kyn
Sahl djahs afah
Mah morn narr
"
awright wrote:
So how does making a thread titled "RIP Bisco's" not equate to girly drama when even with the nerf, its still BIS for IIQ builds ?

Its

Still

The

Best


How the fuck is it ripped ?

And what a fucking surprise that you make excuses over posting your data after slating someone with actual data



"
Furioushobo wrote:
They remove iq gem along time ago. Than put it in a unique neck. Me never understood.



someone paid for it. simple as that.


Do you even know how shit works? =/ It's not the best anymore not even by a long shot dude lol
Dys an sohm
Rohs an kyn
Sahl djahs afah
Mah morn narr
Last edited by Coconutdoggy#1805 on Feb 27, 2018, 3:36:21 AM
I'm kind of glad I won't feel as pressured to use it on every build, but at the same time, I did love those extra drops. Especially alchs. Bisco's gave you so many extra alchs. Like, 20% more at the very least.
"
I_NO wrote:
Do you even know how shit works? =/ It's not the best anymore not even by a long shot dude lol



Legacy IIQ on an amulet goes upto 20% iirc

The bino's gave upto 100% on the current(Abyss) iteration, the nerfed version is going down to 50%

Thats not an outright half as effective nerf, thats only maybe a 33% overall effectiveness nerf when taking diminishing returns into account

if going for an outright IIQ build, tell me why an amulet giving approximately 35% IIQ (After diminishing returns) isnt better than one that gives 16% ?

Do you even know how shit works bro ?


[edit]
Waiting for the all caps dogshit deflection reply, oh and sun's data to prove his argument too
Last edited by awright#1711 on Feb 27, 2018, 3:57:51 AM

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info