"
"
Sorry if this has been asked but....what order for ascendancies?
Master Alchemist > Master Herbalist > Veteran Bowyer
Thanks :)
|
Posted byKdronin18on Jan 26, 2017, 5:04:27 AM
|
"
"
What about using a Vessel of Vinktar instead of Atziri or basalt?
Definitively not worth using over Atziri but you could replace one of the regular utility flasks with it. The leech from Vinktar is not really needed and it wouldn't be that much with just the added lightning damage on the flask itself. It would be useful for shocking without VLT though, could increase general clearspeed a bit if you hit Vinktar on every rare/big pack. Everything pretty much dies instantly already though.
but with the "convert physical to lightning" variant the leech would be higher than the "adds lightning to attcks", correct?
|
Posted byDeusMatton Jan 26, 2017, 5:13:08 AM
|
"
"
"
What about using a Vessel of Vinktar instead of Atziri or basalt?
Definitively not worth using over Atziri but you could replace one of the regular utility flasks with it. The leech from Vinktar is not really needed and it wouldn't be that much with just the added lightning damage on the flask itself. It would be useful for shocking without VLT though, could increase general clearspeed a bit if you hit Vinktar on every rare/big pack. Everything pretty much dies instantly already though.
but with the "convert physical to lightning" variant the leech would be higher than the "adds lightning to attcks", correct?
Yes that's correct but it would lower your base physical damage and thus your poison damage. I would use Vinktar primarily to shock, as you can see from the videos the leech is really high with just Atziri flask. Shocking with Vinktar will also increase your chaos leech through more damage done. I think it would be complete overkill to use a conversion Vinktar for leech purposes.
IGN : asdfman
|
Posted byasdfmanon Jan 26, 2017, 11:19:42 AM
|
|
so, in the end which variant of the VoV would you suggest? I really like the shock in a flask in some occasions
Last edited by DeusMatt on Jan 26, 2017, 11:31:37 AM
|
Posted byDeusMatton Jan 26, 2017, 11:31:07 AM
|
"
so, in the end which variant of the VoV would you suggest? I really like the shock in a flask in some occasions
I'd definitively use the added light to spells version.
IGN : asdfman
|
Posted byasdfmanon Jan 26, 2017, 1:33:07 PM
|
|
If i dont get to try this before any changes i will be mad!
|
Posted byenemymigson Jan 26, 2017, 3:15:19 PM
|
|
Hi, I have a doubt about the use, first you cast Blade vortex 4l, and then BV of 6l, here my doubt, you use one or both Bv of the chest.
|
Posted byulthane010on Jan 28, 2017, 6:08:28 AM
|
"
Hi, I have a doubt about the use, first you cast Blade vortex 4l, and then BV of 6l, here my doubt, you use one or both Bv of the chest.
It sounds like you're asking if you're supposed to use both of the BV gems in the 6l?
The answer is yes.
Your current BV stacks use the damage of all three gems, so you:
1. Cast the 4L multiple times to get stacks
2. Cast one 6L BV gem
3. Cast the other 6L BV gem
Last edited by PhillipJokar2 on Jan 28, 2017, 1:12:13 PM
|
Posted byPhillipJokar2on Jan 28, 2017, 1:11:29 PM
|
"
"
Hi, I have a doubt about the use, first you cast Blade vortex 4l, and then BV of 6l, here my doubt, you use one or both Bv of the chest.
It sounds like you're asking if you're supposed to use both of the BV gems in the 6l?
The answer is yes.
Your current BV stacks use the damage of all three gems, so you:
1. Cast the 4L multiple times to get stacks
2. Cast one 6L BV gem
3. Cast the other 6L BV gem
Thank you, yes that was my question.
|
Posted byulthane010on Jan 29, 2017, 8:19:31 AM
|
|
does the 2XBV in 6L still work ?
|
Posted bymopzion Jan 30, 2017, 9:41:34 AM
|
