Feedback and Suggestions (Path of Exile 1) - SET FREE THE ASCENDANCY POINTS (or rework the lab) [New ascension methods/lab rework ideas] - Forum

" Xavathos wrote: " goetzjam wrote: " Zalhan2 wrote: People like dieing they just do not want to waste 20 minutes of tedious bullshit every time they die. Then dont die. " While improving it is a good thing. I still do not want to play a platform game even if its well designed which the lab isn't. GGG doesn't care if you want to play it or not, you do it for the points regardless. Exactly. It's like wanting to have dinner but you don't want to cook. That's fine, but no cooking means no food. Alternative is ordering food for 2c, all you have to do then is wait a bit. No it's like going to Ruth Chris and being told you need to eat this bowl of shit before the fillet will be served.	Posted by Zalhan2#1986 on Jul 12, 2017, 7:44:33 PM Quote this Post
" Zalhan2 wrote: " Xavathos wrote: " goetzjam wrote: GGG doesn't care if you want to play it or not, you do it for the points regardless. Exactly. It's like wanting to have dinner but you don't want to cook. That's fine, but no cooking means no food. Alternative is ordering food for 2c, all you have to do then is wait a bit. No it's like going to Ruth Chris and being told you need to eat this bowl of shit before the fillet will be served. And when you complain to the waiter that you don't like eating shit he says, "You are not good at eating shit. You need to just get better at eating shit." Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!	Posted by Turtledove#4014 on Jul 12, 2017, 7:51:50 PM Quote this Post
" Fruz wrote: As much as some design flaws could arguably be considered bug by some ( check the link I shared in one of my previous recent messages here ), balance changes such as the 60% coefficient was nothing like a bug. " Turtledove wrote: You are free to deny the reality that design bugs are real. Selective attention/reading fallacy I see lol. The fact is that you don't seem capable of differentiating the programming team and the balance team, and call balance changes "bugs". But since you've been claiming "I've been a software programmer for 40 years, duh !", might be hard to admit it now. [Removed by Support] " goetzjam wrote: [quote"Zalhan2"] People like dieing they just do not want to waste 20 minutes of tedious bullshit every time they die. Then dont die.[/quote] But you know, they all find it soooo easy .... /rofl So much contradictory lines everywhere .... SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading. Last edited by Jess_GGG#0000 on Jul 13, 2017, 8:53:17 PM	Posted by Fruz#6137 on Jul 12, 2017, 11:13:55 PM Quote this Post
" Fruz wrote: " Fruz wrote: As much as some design flaws could arguably be considered bug by some ( check the link I shared in one of my previous recent messages here ), balance changes such as the 60% coefficient was nothing like a bug. " Turtledove wrote: You are free to deny the reality that design bugs are real. Selective attention/reading fallacy I see lol. The fact is that you don't seem capable of differentiating the programming team and the balance team, and call balance changes "bugs". But since you've been claiming "I've been a software programmer for 40 years, duh !", might be hard to admit it now. [Removed by Support] And I guess that when you're in such a corner, the only thing left to do to you is throwing "poop analogies", of course. Any change to the design that is not adding new features or content could reasonably be considered to be fixing design bugs. So, yes balance changes can be reasonably considered to be design bugs. [Removed by Support] Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired! Last edited by Patrick_GGG#0000 on Jul 13, 2017, 1:01:42 AM	Posted by Turtledove#4014 on Jul 13, 2017, 12:24:00 AM Quote this Post
" Turtledove wrote: So, yes balance changes can be reasonably considered to be design bugs. No. A bug is an unexpected outcome from the programming team. Balance changes do not fall in this category at all, period. Now, you are either ridiculously showing your bad faith, or that previous "argumentum ad verecundiam" was nothing but thin air. In both cases, there seem to be an honesty issue here. SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading. Last edited by Fruz#6137 on Jul 13, 2017, 2:08:12 AM	Posted by Fruz#6137 on Jul 13, 2017, 2:02:02 AM Quote this Post
" Turtledove wrote: " Zalhan2 wrote: No it's like going to Ruth Chris and being told you need to eat this bowl of shit before the fillet will be served. And when you complain to the waiter that you don't like eating shit he says, "You are not good at eating shit. You need to just get better at eating shit." You must really like poop. Damn. Carry on my waypoint son, there'll be peace when maps are done. Lay your portal gem to rest, don't you die no more. 'Cause it's a bitter sweet symphony this league. Try to make maps meet, you're a slave to the meta, then you leave.	Posted by Xavathos#5130 on Jul 13, 2017, 2:16:49 AM Quote this Post
" Fruz wrote: " Turtledove wrote: So, yes balance changes can be reasonably considered to be design bugs. No. A bug is an unexpected outcome from the programming team. Balance changes do not fall in this category at all, period. Now, you are either ridiculously showing your bad faith, or that previous "argumentum ad verecundiam" was nothing but thin air. In both cases, there seem to be an honesty issue here. No point in arguing with him about that. I mean his BFF thinks that supporter pack purchases are donations. https://youtu.be/T9kygXtkh10?t=285 FeelsBadMan Remove MF from POE, make juiced map the new MF.	Posted by goetzjam#3084 on Jul 13, 2017, 2:17:16 AM Quote this Post
" goetzjam wrote: No point in arguing with him about that. I mean his BFF thinks that supporter pack purchases are donations. And YOU singled ME out as a shitposter. Welcome to the club :) Bring me some coffee and I'll bring you a smile.	Posted by Phrazz#3529 on Jul 13, 2017, 2:57:42 AM Quote this Post
" Xavathos wrote: " Turtledove wrote: " Zalhan2 wrote: No it's like going to Ruth Chris and being told you need to eat this bowl of shit before the fillet will be served. And when you complain to the waiter that you don't like eating shit he says, "You are not good at eating shit. You need to just get better at eating shit." You must really like poop. Damn. Well if you don't poop, you die. That doesn't mean you should eat poop. It's the same with the video game industry. If it wasn't for Mario it probably wouldn't be half as big as it is now. That doesn't mean you should put Mario in your game or eat poop for that matter... I'm a forum warrior, i was born to post, raised to defend my league. Now my post has been removed, chained and exiled by mods who Ban. Ban is my brother; i do not fear it. I see it in the eyes of men and beasts that i troll. It will take me to play the actual game when i am ready and i am not ready.	Posted by Pyrokar#6587 on Jul 13, 2017, 3:21:29 AM Quote this Post
" Pyrokar wrote: It's the same with the video game industry. If it wasn't for Mario it probably wouldn't be half as big as it is now. That doesn't mean you should put Mario in your game or eat poop for that matter... I think it was bound to happen sooner or later, there was a ton of untapped potential in interactive entertainment. It's like the great discoveries, they're so great we couldn't have possibly missed them, some just did it a bit early. Wish the armchair developers would go back to developing armchairs. ◄[www.moddb.com/mods/balancedux]► ◄[www.moddb.com/mods/one-vision1]►	Posted by raics#7540 on Jul 13, 2017, 4:16:09 AM Quote this Post