Donald Trump

"

LostForm wrote:

nah still don't care, you guys have treated everything done by Hillary, imagined or real, with the same levels of outrage. How's that body count list coming?

And you can go back in this (or was it the other?) thread and read me debunking that.

The Project Veritas video isn't the same shit, though. It's hard-fought undercover investigative journalism. You know, that thing the spin industry isn't interested in anymore. And I don't just mean MSNBC, I mean FOX too.

My personal view is that the corruption in the Clinton campaign is largely motivated and concealed by the conspiracy theorist subculture which began in the 1990s and is still represented here by the likes of Dalai and Ray. It's opportunism, enabled precisely because our culture is now desensitized to such claims of corruption. It's like the story of the boy who cried wolf, if the wolf understood both the spoken word and strategy.

'We wanted it to come from the people.'

It did. The people have taken over a lot of plans this election process. If you plan for watering your crops, and then you have a rainy season, did you really change the outcome by having a plan?

If CNN is covering things the way the campaign wants, well, I cant say enough how garbage CNN is, and have been saying it for awhile. But FOX News and Drudge Report and others clearly coordinate with the RNC with their message. In fact during Bush's administration, it was common practice for the administration to produce the news stories for the networks, with no disclaimers, to be played as network content.


Sounds like they obeyed the letter of law with the communication apparatus between super pacs and DNC and campaigns. It sounds like a common set up.

I don't know enough about campaign laws to know if it is illegal to hire people to organize people to stand outside of events with a controversial message in hopes of creating a scene. I know the people being there wasn't illegal, so I don't know if the origin of their desire to be there is relevant? Legally?

Ethically dubious, but always relating to amplifying the protester's impact. I didn't see if the actually payed their birddoggers or only showed them how to be an impactful protester. Those people wanted to be there.

Hmm, yesterday did a post in the Rigged election video that got loads of likes (also liked the video), came back today, was checking MundaneMatt channel and tried recommending that he should do a video on it. By testing writing several times, I realized that whenever I tried to write "James O'keefe", "rigged", "election" "veritas" or the link to the video, I'd get a "unknown error" in red. Saw in comments of the video that other people also experienced this unknown error. Now youtube bell was red with 1 notification, I clicked it and it disappeared and said I got ZERO previous messages, and this:



Old account from the first years of youtube, never a problem until this.
Clearly just a coincidence :^)
Its not like Google has any monetary connections to the clintons :^)

Eh, and ofc there's no detailed explanation, way to contest this, etc.
Top youtube customer service as usual :^)

EDIT: reminds me back when twitter was delaying some account twits on some incidents from appearing for a few days. One does not need to outright remove everything, just cripple it enough in order to disrupt the flow. Oh I forgot, Im saying this because I can reply to people easily, but not do a standalone post unless its really short

"

LostForm wrote:

nah still don't care, you guys have treated everything done by Hillary, imagined or real, with the same levels of outrage. How's that body count list coming?

As the butcher in Diablo would say: "Fresh Meat"

3 recent victims. Let's see if you can figure out who they are.
If you get stuck there's a hint under the spoiler



And of course, we now have Hillary's campaign literally shitting on the public:



And the story from CBS news:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oVkYlLIleM

and from another station:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6ve6fw4P98

"

Disrupted wrote:

Spoiler

Hmm, yesterday did a post in the Rigged eletion video that got loads of likes (also liked the video), came back today, was checking MundaneMatt channel and tried recommending that he should do a video on it. By testing writing several times, I realized that whenever I tried to write "James O'keefe", "rigged", "election" "veritas" or the link to the video, I'd get a "unknown error" in red. Saw in comments of the video that other people also experienced this unknown error. Now youtube bell was red with 1 notification, I clicked it and it disappeared and said I got ZERO previous messages, and this:



Old account from the first years of youtube, never a problem until this.
Clearly just a coincidence :^)
Its not like Google has any monetary connections to the clintons :^)

Eh, and ofc there's no detailed explanation, way to contest this, etc.
Top youtube customer service as usual :^)

EDIT: reminds me back when twitter was delaying some account twits on some incidents from appearing for a few days. One does not need to outright remove everything, just cripple it enough in order to disrupt the flow. Oh I forgot, Im saying this because I can reply to people easily, but not do a standalone post unless its really short

Allegedly, Twitter and YouTube have been and are definitely manipulating trending, banning hashtags, shadow banning, and limiting access and availability to what they think are significantly damaging anti-Hillary material. In the case of the vote rigging video you mention, the number of views remained fixed and was reduced to one third of what it was, then YouTube's manipulation of view counts was so bad that for awhile the video had more likes than it had views. When people started posting evidence that it was happening on a few other sites, the manipulation mysteriously stopped.

If Trump is elected, I fully expect that Google will get broken up into smaller companies. What DJT will do to Twitter, CNN, CBS, NBC, and ABC I can only speculate on. Trump could very well end up owning the New York Times. (Considering that the market cap on the NYT is ~950 million and a presidential race has expenditures of 1 billion plus (Hillary's spending may end up breaking the 2 billion dollar mark)

Unless Hillary is elected, there will be legal repercussions and I think that is why they are going to such lengths that it becomes noticeable.

^well, I dunno about viewcount, it might just be bugged. Think its not the first time I've seen it delayed when a video is gaining traction. Ofc I cannot know for sure if its just a bug or they are doing it on purpose. but would give the benefit of the doubt with how buggy youtube can be sometimes.
EDIT: oh, forgot, im more worried about whether or not the video was removed from trend list, think it should be there considering the numbers. I dont know if youtube has an history about this, but twitter definitely removes trending hashtags from the top list if they dont match their prefered narratives


Wondering what got my account flagged. if it was some automatic trigger to some word(s) I wrote or my post in the video bothered some youtube hero or something (which really shouldnt, since it was just a "suicide with 2 bullets to the back of the head" joke). Searching info on this situation, found people who think it might have been something as simple as liking the video, but I am not so sure of that, think the numbers would be bigger if it was that simple.

Also on Trump: I dunno, If he is elected I wouldnt be surprised if he was assassinated, there were already 2 guys trying to rush him on stage, and they were only tools emotionally affected by the media. I imagine if he goes through with things like his recent plan against lobbyists and whatnot, the amount of interest groups with the intent of ending his life would shorten his presidency to a few months.
Sure its not like its the easiest thing to pull, but you didnt need that other video to tell you that there's always someone willing to do the job. You just need someone either desperate or crazy enough.

I too think Trump will get assassinated as president. Would that be enough to start a civil war?

"

NeroNoah wrote:

"

Xavderion wrote:

When Hillary goes to war vs Russia, I'm out.

You can't go to war with Russia .

Hillary disagrees:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vfnhbsCyKuM

Don't worry about Trump being assassinated. She will win and don't think I'm happy to say such a thing.

Last debate tonight who is watching?